Judgment Summary of Chong Shiong Hui Case

Jan 5, 2025

Summary of [2024] SGHC 316 Judgment

Case Details

  • Court: General Division of the High Court of Singapore
  • Case Number: Criminal Case No 63 of 2024
  • Judgment Date: Sentence announced on 6 December 2024
  • Judge: Aidan Xu @ Aedit Abdullah J
  • Parties:
    • Public Prosecutor
    • Accused: Chong Shiong Hui

Brief Remarks by Aidan Xu @ Aedit Abdullah J

Charges

  • Accused pleaded guilty to one charge of attempted murder under s307(1) of the Penal Code.
  • Two other charges under ss426 and 427 of the Penal Code were considered for sentencing.
  • Sentencing arguments included proposals for 10 years imprisonment and 5 strokes of the cane from the defense.

Conclusion

  • The court concluded that a 16-year imprisonment with 5 strokes of the cane was appropriate.
  • Emphasized the need for retribution and general deterrence over rehabilitative aspects due to the viciousness and persistence of the attack.

Circumstances of the Offense

  1. Pre-Attack Actions:

    • Sent multiple threatening WhatsApp messages.
    • Attempted calls to the victim.
    • Went to the victim’s home with a concealed chopper, petrol, and cigarettes.
    • Deflated the victim’s husband’s car tire and switched off the main power switch.
    • Continued sending threats, including showing photographs of weapons.
  2. Attack Scenario:

    • Lured the victim to his parents’ home under the pretense of a discussion.
    • Armed with a chopper and a kitchen knife.
    • Conducted a persistent and vicious attack on the victim resulting in multiple slashes and attempted further harm.
    • Stopped by his mother, allowing the victim to escape.

Sentencing Considerations

  • Blameworthiness: High due to premeditated nature and escalation of plan.
  • Harm: Serious physical injuries and psychological impact on the victim.
  • Mitigatory Factors: Plea of guilt was the only considerable factor.

Judge’s Comments on Sentencing

  • Stressed the need for a punishment that reflects the severity and persistence of the attack.
  • Compared with Public Prosecutor v Shoo Ah San case where a 15-year sentence was given without caning due to offender's age.
  • Clarified that severe sentences are typically reserved for trial cases, but acknowledged potential for maximum sentences even in plea cases with exceptional circumstances.

Final Sentence

  • 16 years imprisonment and 5 strokes of the cane, backdated to 30 November 2019 when first remanded.

Legal Representation

  • For Prosecution: Andre Chong Wei Min, Kay Boon Khai Jordy (Attorney-General’s Chambers)
  • For Accused: Sunil Sudheesan, Khoo Hui-Hui Joyce, Teh Ryan Christopher Wei Jun (Quahe Woo & Palmer LLC)