To What Extent Do Conservatives Agree on the Role of the State?
Overview of Conservatism
- Conservatism is seen more as a set of beliefs about societal progression than a coherent ideology.
- Key conservative thinkers differ in opinions about the role of the state based on their views of human nature.
Traditional vs. Contemporary Views
- Thomas Hobbes and Edmund Burke:
- View the state as necessary for ensuring order and stability.
- Believe human nature is inherently immoral, influenced by Christian original sin.
- Hobbes emphasized a powerful state to prevent chaotic human impulses.
- Ayn Rand and Richard Nozick:
- Argue for a minimal state involvement.
- See humans as rational and selfish, which is not immoral but a path to self-fulfillment.
- Support negative liberty and resist state attempts to promote positive liberty.
Human Nature and State Role
- Hobbes and Burke:
- Human nature requires a strong state to avoid chaos and ensure security.
- Hobbes' book Leviathan advocates for an all-powerful state.
- Rand and Nozick:
- Believe in an egotistical, objectivist view of human nature.
- Advocate for a "night watchman" state that intervenes only when necessary.
Economic Perspectives
- General agreement on a free market and laissez-faire approach, but with variations:
- Rand and Nozick:
- Support an almost entirely free market with minimal government intervention.
- Market seen as a means for individuals to pursue happiness.
- Burke:
- Supported laissez-faire capitalism but also state enforcement of market contracts.
- Oakeshott and Hobbes:
- More skeptical about a truly free market without state moderation.
- Concern about monopolies and exploitation necessitating some regulation.
Conservative Political Party Approaches
- One Nation Conservatives:
- Believe in proactive government involvement in social welfare.
- Support social reforms to aid the less privileged, inspired by noblesse oblige.
- Align with Burke's and Hobbes' views on the role of the elite.
- New Right:
- Favor limited state interference in the economy, promoting privatization.
- Influenced by thinkers like Rand and Nozick, though not entirely laissez-faire.
- Socially conservative, e.g., Thatcher's Section 28.
Conclusion
- Conservative thinkers differ significantly on the state's role due to differing views on human nature.
- Political parties influenced by these thinkers show less disagreement, especially in social conservatism.
- Consensus exists on the state's duty to maintain order and security as a prerequisite for liberty.
Authored by Jonathan Semugooma, Holyport College