Coconote
AI notes
AI voice & video notes
Try for free
Understanding Judicial Review in the US
Jan 30, 2025
Judicial Review
Overview
Definition
: Judicial review is the power of courts to declare acts of government branches unconstitutional and unenforceable.
Example: Courts can strike down laws violating the First Amendment.
State Courts
: Can also strike down state laws based on state or federal constitutions.
Prevalence
: Judicial review is a fundamental aspect of US government.
Courts frequently strike down unconstitutional state and federal laws on various issues.
Global Trend
: Other countries, including Romania, Greece, and EU nations, are adopting judicial review.
Historical Context
Roots
: Judicial review is tied to the principle of separation of powers (Montesquieu, 17th century).
Federalist Paper #78
: Alexander Hamilton advocated for judicial review as a check on legislative power.
British System
: Unlike the US, the UK adheres to legislative supremacy without a constitutional framework for judicial review.
The Marbury Decision
Background
: Marbury v. Madison (1803) established the precedent for judicial review in the US.
Context: Political conflict between Thomas Jefferson and John Adams.
Decision
: Chief Justice John Marshall ruled on procedural grounds, asserting judicial review as a power.
Judiciary Act of 1789 deemed unconstitutional.
Expansion After Marbury
Martin v. Hunter's Lessee (1816)
: Judicial review over state civil cases.
Cohens v. Virginia (1821)
: Extended to state criminal cases.
Cooper v. Aaron (1958)
: Supreme Court can overrule any state actions deemed unconstitutional.
Current Status
: All courts can strike down inconsistent legislation or actions.
Impact of Judicial Review
Key Cases
:
Brown v. Board of Education (1954)
: Ended segregation in public schools.
Gideon v. Wainwright (1963)
: Right to counsel in felony cases.
Loving v. Virginia (1967)
: Invalidated bans on interracial marriage.
Brandenburg v. Ohio (1969)
: Limited state laws on incitement.
Furman v. Georgia (1972)
: Halted inconsistent death penalty application.
Roe v. Wade (1973)
: Legalized abortion under privacy rights.
Buckley v. Valeo (1976)
: Struck down spending limits on political campaigns.
Regents of the University of California v. Bakke (1978)
: Addressed race-based admissions.
Lawrence v. Texas (2003)
: Legalized same-sex activity in states.
Citizens United v. FEC (2010)
: Allowed corporate election spending.
NFIB v. Sebelius (2012)
: Upheld Affordable Care Act but struck down Medicaid funding condition.
Significance
: Judicial review ensures courts act as a co-equal government branch, protecting rights against other branches' actions.
🔗
View note source
https://www.nationalparalegal.edu/JudicialReview.aspx