Overview
These lectures introduce the nine axioms of Zermelo-Fraenkel set theory with the axiom of choice (ZFC), which form the foundational language for all standard mathematics. The epsilon (∈) relation serves as the fundamental primitive, defined only through axioms rather than explicit definitions.
The Epsilon Relation and Fundamental Concepts
- Epsilon (ε) is a fundamental relation, defined as a predicate of two variables.
- No explicit definition exists for epsilon or what a set is in the strictest sense.
- Nine axioms teach how to use epsilon and what constitutes a set through their interplay.
- The approach is necessary to build mathematics from scratch without prior notions or terms.
The Nine Axioms Mnemonic: EEPERPICF
| Axiom Code | Axiom Name | Type | Purpose |
|---|
| E | Epsilon Relation | Basic existence | Defines epsilon as relation only between sets |
| E | Empty Set | Basic existence | Guarantees existence of set with no elements |
| P | Pair Set | Construction | Allows building two-element sets from existing sets |
| E | Union Set | Construction | Creates set from elements of elements |
| R | Replacement | Construction (advanced) | Ensures functional relation images are sets |
| P | Power Set | Further existence | Guarantees existence of set of all subsets |
| I | Infinity | Further existence | Ensures infinite sets exist (e.g., natural numbers) |
| C | Choice | Optional existence | Allows selection of one element from each set |
| F | Foundation | Non-existence | Excludes self-referential sets |
Basic Definitions Using Epsilon
- Not element: x ∉ y defined as ¬(x ∈ y)
- Subset: x ⊆ y means ∀a(a ∈ x → a ∈ y)
- Equality: x = y defined as (x ⊆ y) ∧ (y ⊆ x)
- Equality is ultimately defined in terms of epsilon relation, not taken as primitive.
Axiom 1: Epsilon Relation
- x ∈ y is a proposition (true or false) if and only if both x and y are sets.
- Clarifies that epsilon acts only on sets, not arbitrary objects.
- Historically considered trivial but actually essential for consistency.
Russell's Paradox
- Assume U contains all sets that do not contain themselves: Z ∈ U ↔ Z ∉ Z.
- If U ∈ U is true, then by definition U ∉ U (contradiction).
- If U ∈ U is false, then U ∉ U, so by definition U ∈ U (contradiction).
- Conclusion: U is not a set, demonstrating naive set theory is inconsistent.
- Axiom of foundation ultimately excludes such constructions.
Axiom 2: Empty Set
- There exists a set containing no elements: ∃x∀y(y ∉ x).
- Theorem: There is only one empty set, denoted ∅.
- Proof uses definition of subset and equality to show two empty sets must be identical.
- Standard proof uses implication: false statement implies anything (ex falso quodlibet).
Axiom 3: Pair Set
- For any sets x and y, there exists set M containing precisely x and y.
- Formal: ∀x∀y∃M∀u(u ∈ M ↔ (u = x ∨ u = y))
- Notation: {x, y} denotes pair set.
- Order doesn't matter: {x, y} = {y, x} provable from element relation.
- Also guarantees one-element sets: {x} = {x, x}.
Axiom 4: Union Set
- Given set X, there exists set U containing precisely the elements of elements of X.
- Notation: U = ⋃X
- Example: If X = {{a}, {b, c}}, then ⋃X is set containing a, b, c.
- Combined with pair set axiom, defines finite n-element sets recursively.
- Key restriction: can only unify as many sets as fit into a set.
Axiom 5: Replacement
- Let R be functional relation and M be a set; then image of M under R is a set.
- Functional relation: For every x, exists precisely one y such that R(x,y).
- Image: Consists of all y for which there exists x ∈ M with R(x,y).
- Strongest axiom, though full power rarely needed in practice.
Principle of Restricted Comprehension
- Follows from replacement axiom but weaker than replacement itself.
- Let P be one-variable predicate and M be set.
- Then {y ∈ M | P(y)} is a set (selecting elements satisfying condition).
- Not universal comprehension: Cannot collect all y satisfying P without restricting to existing set.
- Universal comprehension leads to Russell's paradox; restricted version is consistent.
- Allows defining complements and intersections of sets.
Axiom 6: Power Set
- For any set M, there exists set P(M) whose elements are precisely subsets of M.
- Cannot be derived from restricted comprehension (no larger set to restrict from).
- Requires dedicated axiom for existence.
- Example: If M = {a, b}, then P(M) = {∅, {a}, {b}, {a,b}}.
Axiom 7: Infinity
- There exists set containing empty set and, with each element y, also contains {y}.
- Smallest such set: {∅, {∅}, {{∅}}, {{{∅}}}, ...}
- These correspond to natural numbers 0, 1, 2, 3, ... under standard construction.
- Corollary: Non-negative integers form a set in axiomatic set theory.
- Real numbers defined as power set of integers.
- Entire universe of sets built from empty set via power sets and constructions.
Axiom 8: Choice
- Let X be set whose elements are non-empty and mutually disjoint sets.
- Then exists set Y containing exactly one element from each element of X.
- Y called "choice set" (no algorithm specified for selection).
- Independence: Axiom of choice is independent of other eight axioms.
- Standard mathematics uses axiom of choice (ZFC includes it).
- Needed to prove every vector space has basis.
- Required for existence of complete system of representatives of equivalence relations.
Axiom 9: Foundation
- Every non-empty set X contains element Y with no elements in common with X.
- Excludes self-referential constructions: no set x satisfies x ∈ x.
- Ensures all sets ultimately built from empty set.
- Introduced last historically despite name "foundation."
- Completes exclusion of Russell-type paradoxes.
Zermelo-Fraenkel Set Theory (ZFC)
- The nine axioms together constitute Zermelo-Fraenkel set theory with choice (ZFC).
- Without axiom C, called ZF set theory.
- All standard mathematics can be constructed from ZFC axioms in principle.
- Every mathematical object ultimately built from empty set using construction axioms.