🚔

Police Stop and Frisk Practices in New York

Jul 17, 2024

Police Stop and Frisk Practices in New York

Incident Involving Leroy Downs

  • Leroy Downs incident while sitting on his own steps
    • Police drove past, reversed, came back, and approached him
    • Officers' reason: claimed he looked like he was smoking weed
    • Downs was talking on his cell phone
    • Officers cursed and pushed him against the fence and searched him
    • No guns or drugs were found
    • Downs reiterated the futility of resisting as it could lead to charges of resisting arrest

Emotional Impact on Downs

  • Downs has experienced similar incidents throughout his life
  • Participates to stop the practice
  • Emotional response when recounting the incident

Official Stance

  • Mayor and Commissioner focus on crime reduction
  • They argue most crimes occur in poorer neighborhoods
  • Lives saved primarily those of young men of color
  • Plan to appeal against the ruling

Federal Judge's Ruling

  • Judge questioned the reasoning behind police stops
  • Statistics (2004 to mid-2012):
    • 4.4 million people stopped
    • 87% were Black or Latino
    • Only 12% were charged with crimes
  • Reasons for stops:
    • Furtive movements
    • Being in high-crime areas
    • Suspicious bulges
  • Judge found the searches unconstitutional
  • Highlighted internal NYPD belief of instilling fear in racially defined groups

Personal Account: David

  • Surrounded by nine officers with guns drawn during one encounter
  • Officers found nothing
  • The judge's ruling was a moment of emotional release for him

Broader Implications

  • Highlights polarization and societal view of people of color
  • Importance of the judgment for New York and symbolizing broader American issues

Judge's Orders

  • Appointment of an independent monitor for phasing out the practice
  • Possible use of body cameras for police officers

Ongoing Legal Battle

  • Police intend to appeal the judgment
  • Question remains if police behavior will change

Public Reaction

  • Widespread public and media attention
  • Scrutiny on whether the ruling will result in real changes in police practices