Overview
This episode examines how Supreme Court campaign finance rulings in the 1970s led to widespread corruption in 1980s politics, culminating in Senator John McCain's decade-long fight for reform through the McCain-Feingold bill.
The Keating Five Scandal (1987ā1989)
- April 2, 1987: Ed Gray (Federal Home Loan Bank Board chairman) summoned to surprise meeting with four senators
- Senators Dennis DeConcini, John Glenn, Alan Cranston, and John McCain pressured Gray to ease regulations on Lincoln Savings & Loan
- Charles Keating Jr., Lincoln S&L owner, had donated $1.3 million total to these five senators
- Senators later met San Francisco regulators, advocating for Keating despite concerns about bank's risky investments
- Lincoln S&L collapsed in 1989; taxpayers paid $3.5 billion to cover losses
- Senate Ethics Committee investigated; McCain cleared of criminal charges but cited for "poor judgment"
- Scandal damaged McCain's reputation despite being cleared; he felt intense public pressure and embarrassment
McCain's Political Background
- Shot down over North Vietnam in 1967; spent 5+ years as POW in Hanoi Hilton
- Released 1973; served as Navy liaison to U.S. Senate, gaining political experience
- 1982: Ran for Arizona's first congressional district; had three advantages: wife's family wealth, friendship with Arizona Republic publisher, Charles Keating's backing
- Keating gave McCain campaigns ~$112,000 ($320,000 today) across three elections (1982, 1984, 1986)
- Keating also hosted McCain family at Bahamas home on private planes
- 1986: McCain elected to Senate, replacing Barry Goldwater; campaign cost $2.6 million (5Ć opponent's spending)
Campaign Finance Problems (1970sā1990s)
- Buckley v. Valeo (1976): Ruled money equals constitutionally protected speech; limited FECA's effectiveness
- 1979 FECA amendments: Reduced disclosure requirements; allowed unlimited "soft money" for party-building activities
- National parties could raise unlimited corporate cash for get-out-the-vote and "party building"
- Issue advocacy loophole: Ads avoiding "magic words" (vote for, elect, defeat) could use unlimited corporate money
- Willie Horton ad (1988) exemplified independent expenditure loophole's power to influence elections
- Companies bought access through soft money donations; leadership meetings priced at specific dollar amounts ($10,000ā$110,000)
- 1996 presidential election saw $260+ million soft money influx; Lincoln bedroom rented to Democratic donors
McCain's Reform Efforts (1995ā2000)
- September 1995: McCain and Senator Russ Feingold introduced Senate Campaign Finance Reform Act
- Bill called for soft money limits, PAC elimination, strengthened spending limits; died in Senate 1996
- January 1997: Reintroduced after 1996 election scandals revealed pay-to-play culture
- Senator Mitch McConnell led opposition, calling reforms unconstitutional speech restrictions
- 1998: Bill failed again after McConnell filibuster (couldn't reach 60 votes)
- 1999: McCain ran for Republican presidential nomination with campaign finance reform as centerpiece platform
- George W. Bush outraised McCain massively using "Bush Pioneers" (donors raising $100,000 each)
- Bush campaign spent ~$70 million winning nomination; McCain dropped out after Super Tuesday
- McCain's campaign resonated nationally; issue struck chord with voters across party lines
The Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act (2001ā2002)
- January 22, 2001: McCain-Feingold reintroduced as Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act (BCRA/"Bikra")
- BCRA prohibited political parties from raising/spending non-federal-limit money (soft money ban)
- Required campaigns to disclose funding sources and expenditures; limited timing of issue ads
- Enron scandal (2002) boosted support; company had donated millions as Bush Pioneer, then collapsed
- February 2002 Gallup poll: 70%+ Americans supported campaign finance reform legislation
- March 20, 2002: BCRA passed Senate 60ā40 despite McConnell's hour-long floor speech
- March 27, 2002: President Bush signed BCRA quietly at night, no ceremony, expressing constitutional concerns
Legal Challenge: McConnell v. FEC (2002ā2003)
- Mitch McConnell immediately filed lawsuit challenging BCRA's constitutionality as lead plaintiff
- Coalition included NRA, U.S. Chamber of Commerce, California Democratic Party, ACLU (strange bedfellows)
- Roger Whitten and McCain team prepared legislative history, speeches, studies defending law
- McConnell's "Dream Team" lawyers: Floyd Abrams, James Bopp, Ken Starr (former Clinton investigator)
- McCain's team: Roger Whitten, Seth Waxman (former solicitor general with 34 prior Supreme Court cases)
- December 10, 2003: Supreme Court ruled 5ā4 upholding BCRA's soft money ban and issue ad limits
- Court agreed money restrictions justified to prevent corruption and preserve election integrity
- Republican-dominated court delivered blow against "master plan" to legalize corruption
Campaign Finance Timeline
| Year | Event | Significance |
|---|
| 1976 | Buckley v. Valeo decision | Money = speech; limited FECA restrictions |
| 1979 | FECA amendments | Created soft money loophole for parties |
| 1987 | Keating Five meeting | Four senators pressured regulators for donor |
| 1989 | Lincoln S&L collapse | $3.5 billion taxpayer bailout; scandal erupts |
| 1995ā1998 | McCain-Feingold attempts | Bills introduced but died in Senate |
| 2000 | McCain presidential campaign | Made campaign finance reform national issue |
| 2002 | BCRA signed into law | Banned soft money; limited issue ads |
| 2003 | McConnell v. FEC | Supreme Court upheld BCRA 5ā4 |
Key Terms & Definitions
- Soft money: Unlimited contributions to political parties for "party building," not directly supporting candidates
- Independent expenditures: Political spending supposedly not coordinated with specific candidates; constitutional under Buckley
- Issue advocacy/sham issue ads: Ads avoiding "magic words" (vote for, elect, defeat) to escape regulation
- Bush Pioneers: Donors who each raised $100,000+ by bundling 100+ maximum donations
- Magic words: Specific terms (vote for, elect, defeat, reject) triggering campaign finance regulation per Buckley footnote 52
- Iron triangle: McCain's term for special interests, campaign finance system, and lobbying interconnection
Action Items & Next Steps
- Roger Whitten predicted "the Empire would strike back" against campaign finance reform
- Episode ends with Chief Justice Roberts taking oath, hinting at future court composition changes
- Suggests upcoming challenges to BCRA and campaign finance restrictions in subsequent episodes