💧

Flint Water Crisis: Governance and Consequences

Sep 7, 2024

Flint Water Crisis: Overview and Insights from "We the Poisoned"

Historical Context

  • Flint, Michigan, once a thriving city in the 1950s-60s due to the auto industry (GM), faced economic decline due to:
    • Offshoring of jobs
    • Deregulation and money in politics
    • White flight, redlining, and racist rezoning
  • By the 2000s, Flint was economically decayed.

Governance and Decision Making

  • Republican Governor Rick Snyder declared financial emergencies in predominantly Black cities like Flint and Detroit, appointing unelected emergency managers.
  • Democracy was undermined as these managers could override elected city councils.
  • The goal was to regionalize and privatize the water system, reducing dependency on Detroit, which provided water from the Great Lakes.

Water System Changes

  • Flint switched from Detroit's treated water to a proposed new system using Flint River water, historically polluted by industries like GM.
  • A financial scheme allowed Flint to borrow $100 million for this project, despite having no credit rating.

Warnings and Ignored Risks

  • Governor Snyder was warned by his environmental officials about the risks of using Flint River water, including bacterial and carcinogenic threats.
  • Flint's water plant workers also raised alarms about the plant's incapacity to properly treat the water.

Outcome and Impact

  • The switch to Flint River water led to complaints and health issues, including Legionnaires' disease, shortly after implementation.
  • Residents suffered from health problems like elevated lead levels, cancers, liver and kidney issues, and neurological damage.
  • A local pediatrician, Dr. Mona Hatisha, provided crucial evidence of increased lead levels in children, pushing authorities to acknowledge the crisis after 18 months.

Government and Institutional Response

  • Federal and state governments were complicit; the EPA did not adequately intervene despite being aware of the issues.
  • Obama’s visit and reassurance to Flint residents, suggesting the water was safe, was controversial and criticized.
  • Legal actions: Multiple state officials faced charges, yet the EPA has not settled or admitted guilt.

Broader Implications

  • The Flint crisis highlights systemic issues in governance, environmental justice, and socio-economic inequality.
  • The ongoing nature of the crisis, with unresolved health impacts and incomplete infrastructure repair, reflects broader failures at multiple governmental levels.

Call to Action

  • The conversation continues with talks and events, inviting public engagement and awareness through various platforms.