đź§ 

Mead vs. Cooley on Self

Dec 8, 2025

Overview

  • Lecture compares Charles Cooley and George Herbert Mead on social influence in self-identity.
  • Focuses on Mead's theory of how social interaction shapes the self across developmental stages.
  • Introduces Mead’s stages: preparatory, play, and game; and his concepts of the "me," the "I," and the "generalized other."

Key Differences: Cooley vs. Mead

  • Cooley: Everyone a person interacts with across life can influence self-identity.
  • Mead: Influence is more limited — certain people at certain life stages matter most.
  • Mead: The form of social influence changes across the lifespan.

Mead’s Developmental Stages

  • Preparatory Stage
    • Children primarily imitate others (e.g., mimic cooking, cleaning).
    • Imitation is not true interaction; children lack perspective-taking.
    • Begin practicing symbols (gestures, words) used in later communication.
  • Play Stage
    • Children engage in pretend play (role-playing as parents, doctors, firefighters).
    • Start role-taking: mentally assuming others’ perspectives and responding accordingly.
    • Move beyond mere imitation to creating social interactions.
  • Game Stage
    • Children understand multiple roles and broader social expectations.
    • Begin to grasp the "generalized other" — society’s attitudes and norms.
    • Recognize people perform based on personal beliefs and societal expectations.
    • Realize individuals can occupy multiple roles simultaneously.

Key Concepts and Definitions

  • Role-Taking
    • Mentally assuming another person’s perspective and acting from it.
  • Generalized Other
    • Society as a whole; the internalized sense of general norms and expectations.
  • Significant Others
    • Individuals with important relationships (parents, teachers, close peers) whose opinions matter most.
  • "Me"
    • The social self: how we believe the generalized other sees us; learned via interaction.
  • "I"
    • The response of the individual to the "me"; personal reactions and initiatives.
  • Self (per Mead)
    • The actual self emerges as the balance between the "I" and the "me."

Examples and Clarifications

  • Young children are egocentric (similar to Piaget): they don’t take others’ perspectives.
  • Early confusion when children see teachers outside school illustrates limited role understanding.
  • Example: "Me" recognizes that going to college after high school is typical; the "I" questions if alternate paths might be better.

Summary Table: Mead’s Stages and Outcomes

StageAge/CharacteristicPrimary ProcessOutcome/Understanding
PreparatoryVery young children; early imitationImitation; practice of symbols and gesturesNot true interaction; limited perspective-taking
PlayPreschool/early childhoodRole-playing; role-taking (pretend play)Ability to assume others’ perspectives; create interactions
GameLater childhoodUnderstanding multiple roles; awareness of generalized otherGrasp of societal norms; concern about significant others’ perceptions

Implications for Identity Formation

  • Social identity emerges progressively as children internalize others’ viewpoints.
  • Concern about others’ evaluations focuses on significant others rather than everyone.
  • Identity is dynamic: social influences ("me") and individual responses ("I") interact continuously.

Action Items / Next Steps (If Studying)

  • Review Piaget’s egocentrism to compare with Mead’s preparatory stage.
  • Identify examples from daily life illustrating the "generalized other."
  • Reflect on personal examples of "I" vs. "me" decisions to solidify concepts.