AI in Aviation - Key Topics and Discussions (Day 1)

Jul 19, 2024

Lecture Notes: AI in Aviation - Key Topics and Discussions (Day 1) - Various Speakers

Introduction

  • Focuses on how AI can support aviation safely.
  • Importance of collaboration across industry, regulators, academia, and researchers.
  • EASA (European Union Aviation Safety Agency) is leading in AI for aviation, working with the FAA (Federal Aviation Administration) and other stakeholders.

Research and Innovation Partnerships

  • IPC Projects (Innovation Partnerships Contracts) between EASA and companies for innovation:
    • 2020-2021: Computer vision-based runway & traffic detection with a Swiss startup.
    • 2022: Formal verification methods for neural networks, working on maintenance applications with Collins Aerospace.
    • 2023: Moving towards Level 2 AI, auto-taxiing projects with Boeing.

AI Applications & Frameworks

  • Research under Horizon Europe and the MLeap machine learning project led by Bundeswehr University Munich.
  • Emphasis on inter-disciplinary cooperation between different sectors.
  • AI applications range from anti-collision systems to natural language processing and camera-based automatic inspections.

Certification and Safety Standards

  • AI in aviation certification projects initiated for simpler, general aviation aircraft to eventually cover larger aircraft.
  • 2022: Published the first AI special condition SC AI-01 and the first EASA AI paper.
  • Common denominator: Trustworthiness framework is essential.
  • AI Concept Papers will consolidate in the rule-making task 0742.

Event Overview

  • Divided into two days; Day 1 focuses on the EASA AI roadmap and framework consolidation. Day 2 focuses on machine learning research projects and findings.
  • Importance of timelines and industry push for practical applications of AI.
  • Closing with ethical aspects of AI; ethics is crucial and led by EASA's PhD research.

Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Input

  • Guiding Principles: Focus on safety, seeing AI as an engineering component, and using existing regulations where possible.
  • Learned AI vs Learning AI: Priority on learned AI due to its deterministic behavior. Learning AI is for future considerations.
  • Incremental approach: Starting with low-criticality applications to understand AI deeply before expanding.
  • Conformance Assessment: Conformance assessments for safety certifications remain a key consideration.

Scientific Committee Overview

  • Scientific committee supports EASA on AI and Automation issues, per its annual reports.
  • Work Programs: Human-machine collaboration, ethics in AI, and levels of automation in various fields (e.g., aviation, automotive, rail, etc.).
  • Importance of human factors and ethics in AI safety and trustworthiness.

Certification and Research Methodologies

  • Research and industry consultations feed into AI Assurance objectives and concept papers.
  • Challenges: Reinforcement learning, explainability, continuous safety and security risk assessment including ethics-based assessments.
  • Future explorations include expanding the concept paper to cover hybrid AI, symbolic AI, and robust safety and security measures.

Standardization and Industry Response

  • Alignment between EASA's concept paper and industry standards (e.g., EURO-CAE/SAE working groups on ML standards).
  • Emphasis on industry collaboration to create actionable, scalable AI standards in aviation.

Use Cases and Panel Discussions

  • Tales: Conflict detection and resolution, digital co-pilot assistance, and contrail mitigation using AI.
  • uAvionix: Human-AI teaming and decision-making assistance for pilots.
  • Deep Blue: Human factors in AI, intelligent assistant prototypes for aviation, and ethical training.
  • CAE: AI-driven performance assessment in pilot training with physiological monitoring.
  • Boeing: Automated taxi systems and real-time AI system demonstration.

Ethics in AI

  • Survey Insights: Comfort, trust, and acceptance of AI by aviation professionals; high emphasis on ethical deployment of AI.
  • Risk of De-skilling: Major concern among professionals, implications for training and competence maintenance.
  • Regulation and Responsibility: Importance of shared responsibility and accountability in AI-driven systems.

Conclusion and Way Forward

  • AI is a transformative force in aviation, requiring a balanced approach blending regulation, ethical considerations, and industry collaboration.
  • Future steps include continuous stakeholder engagements, further research, and iterative development of standards to align with evolving AI capabilities and challenges.
  • Ongoing efforts on harmonizing standards globally, particularly between EASA and FAA, aim for universal safety standards.