Exploring Individual Responses to Media Effects

Aug 12, 2024

Lecture Notes: Understanding Media Effects

Introduction

  • Media affects our moods significantly.
  • Different experiences from consuming dark thrillers, government meetings, and cute kitten compilations.
  • Communication experts study theories on how media impacts emotions.

Historical Perspective on Media Effects

  • Early theories viewed media effects as strong and predictable.
  • Hypodermic Needle Theory: Media injected into audiences like a vaccine, causing uniform effects.
  • Assumptions: Sad news = sadness; positive ads = desire to purchase.

Change in Understanding Media Effects

  • Shift in media landscape with the advent of niche internet media.
  • Differential Susceptibility to Media Effects Model (2013): Developed by Patty Valkenburg and Johan Peter.
    • Recognizes individual differences in response to media based on life experiences.
    • More nuanced than the hypodermic needle theory.

Components of the Differential Susceptibility Model

1. Types of Susceptibility

  • Dispositional Susceptibility: Influence based on personal values and moods.
  • Developmental Susceptibility: Impact varies with age; e.g., children vs. teenagers react differently to scary scenes.
  • Social Susceptibility: Influence from peers and social context.
    • Example: Religious upbringing alters reactions to media references.

2. Response States

  • Cognitive Response States: How we engage with media based on attention span and thought processes.
    • Short attention spans may reduce media effect.
  • Emotional Response States: Feelings of empathy/sympathy towards characters can enhance media impact.
    • Example: Losing a pet may intensify the emotional response to a sad movie about a dog.
  • Excitative Response States: Physical reactions to media, like fight-or-flight responses during breaking news.

Interaction of Susceptibility and Response States

  • Both susceptibilities and response states predict media use and moderate its effects.
    • Example: A person with a short attention span may avoid long books or political meetings.
  • Unique personal backgrounds shape media reactions:
    • A kickboxing family vs. a musician family will react differently to violence in media.
  • Reciprocal Causal Effect: Media choices influence susceptibilities and responses over time.

Case Study: Jocelyn's Media Experience

  • Jocelyn, 14, gets her first cell phone and downloads a social media app.
  • Initially seeks connection but encounters negative content.
  • Experiences mood swings and irritability due to media consumption.
  • Implements changes:
    • Restricts feed to friends only.
    • Uses a timer for social media use.
  • Gains self-awareness and manages her media consumption effectively.

Implications for Media Consumption

  • Understanding media effects helps in making informed choices about media engagement.
  • Encourages self-analysis and recognizing how media impacts personal relationships and moods.
  • Develop a clearer language around media preferences for better communication with others.

Conclusion

  • Media affects everyone differently, but underlying patterns exist.
  • Recognizing personal susceptibility and response states aids in better communication and media consumption choices.
  • Importance of awareness in navigating the complexities of media's impact on our lives.
  • Encouragement to subscribe for more educational content on human communication.