Notes on Stories and Beliefs Around Famous Figures
Jun 19, 2024
Lecture Notes on Stories and Beliefs Around Famous Figures
Introduction
Gaus Azam Legend: Those who shook hands with Gaus Azam were believed to be spared from death.
Common Theme: There's a prevalence of falsehoods in society, impacting even sacred places like mosques where speakers and clergy may spread these dubious stories.
False Claims in Religion
Wuzu and Death: Claim that taking Gaus Pak's name without ablution (wuzu) would result in death or some form of harm. This is contrary to common Islamic belief and lacks evidence.
Imam Abu Hanifa and Allama Tahir ul Qadri: Qadri claimed to have studied directly under Imam Abu Hanifa in dreams over excessive and changing periods (from 9 years to 1520 years).
Junaid Baghdadi: A claim says he walked on water by chanting holy names and enabled others to do so through similar chants. Contrary to realistic Islamic teachings.
Imaginary Dialogues: Unrealistic stories about physical dialogues with non-living entities like the moon asking permission from Gaus Pak before appearing.
Sahaba Stories: Another false story about Hazrat Umar threatening the sun to dim its light.
Unrealistic Characters and Claims
Phone Communication with Saints: Claims of direct phone conversations with deceased saints. Totally imaginary and unfounded.
Origin of Cats: Myths propagated about how cats were created from a lion's sneeze during Noah’s time.
Unfounded Religious Practices: Strange practices like altering the way of performing 'istinja' (cleaning after defecation) during fasting are unfounded in Islamic texts.
Summary of False Legends
Physical Handshake of Gaus Azam: Claims of receiving life assurance by shaking hands with him.
Contradicting Quran: False stories sometimes contradict the Quran. For instance, stating certain people could evade death contradicts the Quranic verse that everyone must taste death.
Perpetuating False Legends: Such legends diminish the real teachings of religion and leverage people's blind faith and lack of critical thinking.
Conclusion
Encourage critically examining such stories. Adherence to authentic religious texts and rational thinking over blind belief in propagated myths or legendary anecdotes should be promoted.
Interaction Call: Engage audience for feedback to decide on future content.
Reflections
Acknowledge the widespread nature of these myths and stories in religious discussions.
Question the potential impact these stories might have on true religious understanding and practice.