Historians Challenge CHA's Genocide Statement

Jan 9, 2025

Open Letter | Christopher Dummitt

Overview

  • A group of historians addresses a letter to the Canadian Historical Association (CHA) and the Canadian public.
  • The letter criticizes the CHA's Canada Day Statement regarding Canada's treatment of Indigenous peoples as genocidal.
  • Published in venues like the Literary Review of Canada and Le Journal de Montreal.

Key Points

Disagreement with CHA's Claims

  • CHA's statement claims consensus among historians on Canada's genocidal intent towards Indigenous peoples.
  • Historians argue there is no widespread scholarly agreement on this interpretation.
  • The letter accuses the CHA of misrepresenting historians' views and professionalism.

Importance of Open Debate

  • Historians emphasize the need for open debate and diverse viewpoints.
  • Criticism of CHA for promoting a single narrative and ignoring alternative interpretations.
  • Concerns about CHA acting as an activist organization rather than a scholarly body.

Call to Action

  • The letter demands the CHA retract its statement.
  • Urges CHA to focus on promoting open debate and viewpoint diversity.
  • Encourages continued research into residential school gravesites and creating a register of deceased children.

Concerns for Academic Freedom

  • Fears expressed by many historians about supporting the letter due to potential risks to tenure and promotion.
  • Call for CHA to adhere to values of objectivity, debate, and access to resources.

Signatories

  • The letter is supported by numerous historians and scholars from various universities and institutions across Canada and abroad.

Conclusion

  • The letter reflects a significant disagreement within the historical community over interpretations of Canadian history related to Indigenous issues.

  • It highlights ongoing debates about academic freedom, scholarly conduct, and the role of historical associations.

  • Published in 2021 by Christopher Dummitt.