Back to notes
Describe the NPC argument in the context of determinism.
Press to flip
The NPC argument suggests humans, made of particles following physical laws, have their actions predetermined by past events, hence lacking real freedom.
What is the primary question discussed in the context of Free Will vs Determinism?
Are we free to choose our actions, or are we like NPCs with predetermined behaviors?
How is free will typically characterized?
Free will is the ability to make choices independently and be responsible for one's actions.
Why does quantum randomness not necessarily support free will?
Because randomness does not equate to conscious decision-making; actions remain outside human control whether they are deterministic or random.
What does the quantum mechanics argument suggest about determinism and free will?
It suggests that even with quantum randomness, the lack of control over randomness does not contribute to free will.
What are emergent properties and how do they relate to free will?
Emergent properties are new traits that arise from complex systems. They suggest that higher layers of complexity, such as consciousness, might allow for free will independent of simpler particle interactions.
What role does consciousness play in the free will argument?
Consciousness and decision-making are seen as emergent properties of complex neuron interactions, allowing humans to potentially contribute to decision-making.
Why do some people prefer the free will argument despite the determinism debate?
They prefer it for its recognition of human complexity and the practical relevance it provides in everyday life.
What basis does free will provide in society?
It provides the basis of morality and is integral to legal systems.
According to the emergent properties argument, at what level might free will exist?
Free will might exist at the higher layer of consciousness and brain interactions.
What does determinism assert about free will?
Determinism asserts that free will is impossible due to the laws of the universe that predetermine every action.
How does the concept of layers of reality support the free will argument?
It proposes that each layer (atoms, cells, organs, consciousness) introduces unique rules and properties, implying independence and potential for free will at higher levels.
How does the analogy of playing pool relate to determinism?
Like pool balls whose behavior is determined by physical laws, human actions are also seen as predetermined by physical laws governing particles.
How do emergent properties challenge the deterministic view?
By proposing that new rules and properties arise at higher complexity levels, suggesting that free will may exist at the consciousness level despite deterministic particle behavior.
What is the practical stance on the existence of free will?
As long as decisions feel free and autonomous, the philosophical debate on the actual existence of free will might be less significant.
Previous
Next