University of Chicago Writing Program Lecture Notes
Overview of Writing Program
Unique top-down approach to writing, unlike most schools' bottom-up approach.
Unlike most universities, Chicago’s program has more faculty than freshmen, aided by faculty from the medical school.
Purpose of the Program
Focus on helping faculty, as writing problems are often seen at this level, rather than just with students.
Challenges the standard notion that writing is a basic skill learned in early education, recognizing that faculty often struggle more than students.
Key Differences in Writing Instruction
This is not a remedial writing course; it is not focused on rules.
Emphasis on thinking about readers instead of adhering to writing rules.
Experts often write to think, complicating their writing process compared to less advanced writers.
Writing Challenges for Experts
Expert writers are writing about complex topics, using writing as a tool for thinking.
Misalignment between how experts write and how readers expect to read can lead to misunderstandings and disengagement.
Importance of Reader Engagement
Writing should aim to change readers' perspectives rather than merely convey ideas.
Faculty and professional audiences are not incentivized to care about student work in the same way teachers are, which demands a shift in writing strategy.
Writing for Value
Writing must be valuable to its intended audience; clarity, organization, and persuasion are secondary to value.
Common misconception: academic writing is about presenting personal ideas; it is about influencing reader perspectives.
Understanding Audience
Writers must know their readers, including their expectations and doubts, to effectively communicate value.
The importance of establishing a connection to the specific community of readers is critical.
Problem Construction in Writing
Identify problems that resonate with readers and present solutions.
Problems should be framed in terms of instability or tension, prompting reader interest.
Literature Reviews
A literature review should enrich the reader's understanding of the problem rather than serve as an ego massage or mere background.
Good reviews create tension and complexity, showing the evolution of thought in the field.
The Gap vs. Error Model
Avoid using the 'gap' language in favor of articulating specific errors or problems within existing knowledge.
Knowledge is not a bounded puzzle; it is expansive and constantly evolving.
Conclusion
Writing is about participating in and advancing the conversation in a community, not preserving ideas indefinitely.
Encourage open dialogue with faculty and utilize resources like the writing program for support and growth.