Understanding Social Learning Theory in Addiction

Sep 29, 2024

Lecture Notes: Social Learning Theory and Addiction

Introduction

  • Transition from learning theories of addiction, focusing previously on classical and operant conditioning.
  • Current session: Focus on Social Learning Theory (SLT), a development on earlier learning theories.

Historical Development of Social Learning Theory

  • Albert Bandura: Key figure in developing SLT.
  • SLT introduced a social cognitive model of human behavior, incorporating internal cognition into behavior models.
  • Differences from classical behaviorism:
    • Classical behaviorism: Direct experience and stimulus-response relationships.
    • SLT: Experience and interpretation act as mediators of behavior; cognition and social contexts play a role.
  • SLT as a transitional step between behaviorist and cognitive theories.

Key Concepts of Social Learning Theory

  • Vicarious Learning: Learning through observation, not direct experience.
    • Behavioral mimicry: Modeling behavior observed in others.
    • Impacted by respect and similarity to the model.
  • Behavioral Change: Experiences don’t always lead directly to behavior change.
    • Interpretation of experiences affects behavior.
    • Denial and attribution play roles in behavior persistence.
  • Reinforcement and Punishment: Indirect factors due to cognitive mediation.
    • Stimulus-information processing-response approach.
    • Expectations of reinforcement/punishment can influence behavior.

Concepts Specific to Addiction

  • Self-Efficacy: Belief in one's ability to succeed in specific situations.

    • Low self-efficacy can lead to avoidance and failure.
    • High self-efficacy can lead to persistence despite failures.
  • Outcome Expectancies: If-then beliefs predicting outcomes of actions.

    • Self-efficacy expectancies: Beliefs about personal capabilities.
    • Outcome expectancies drive motivation and behavior.

Application to Addiction

  • Resistance Self-Efficacy: Confidence in avoiding substance use.
  • Harm Reduction Self-Efficacy: Confidence in minimizing risks after experimentation.
  • Pre-Action Self-Efficacy: Confidence and motivation to change behavior.
  • Action Self-Efficacy: Confidence in performing desired actions.
  • Maintenance Self-Efficacy: Long-term confidence in sustaining behavior change.
  • Recovery Self-Efficacy: Ability to recover from lapses/relapses.

Psychological and Social Influences

  • Intergenerational Influences:
    • Parental drinking motives influence children’s drinking behavior.
    • Children develop alcohol outcome expectancies similar to parents.
  • Peer Pressure and Social Norms:
    • Neck nomination: A risky drinking game illustrating social pressure.
    • Pre-partying: Consuming alcohol before events to enhance social interactions.
  • Framing and Problem Recognition:
    • Problem drinking can be understood as a continuum rather than binary.
    • Recognizing personal alcohol problems increases with continuum framing.

Conclusion

  • SLT as a development on classical learning theories, incorporating cognitive and social contexts.
  • Importance of self-efficacy and outcome expectancies in understanding addictive behaviors.
  • Practical applications in peer pressure, intergenerational influences, and problem recognition.
  • SLT helps us understand both mind and behavior, providing insights into addiction treatment and prevention.