Asking the grave of Faqih Muqadam can complete 73 wishes, his arrogance is extraordinary, people's prayers to Allah alone are not necessarily realized, there is a guarantee that coming to Faqih Muqadam can complete 73 wishes [Music] we will discuss the statement of Dr. Araji Hasyim MA, wow, cool doctor, but a doctor who misleads many people, yes, look, I will convey a statement because this touches on shirk and invites other people to shirk, so the elephant assembly has an interest in discussing this and that, the reason we are discussing this point is because he is a Sufism figure who is listened to by many people [Music] so the elephant assembly needs to prevent him, this is part of nahi mungkar preventing munkar, okay, let's pay attention to his statement and we will discuss it so that at least people who have been paying attention to observing the Gaza assembly understand that his statement is very wrong and makes people fall into shirk, let's listen to his statement, Sayidina Muhammad, ismullah, the name of the Prophet Muhammad himself is the name of Al Allah, therefore asking with tawasul to Sayidina Muhammad sallallahu alaihi wasallam is part of asking Allah, not Shirk well let's discuss two statements the first is that the name of Muhammad is the same as the name of Allah the second is asking the Prophet Muhammad is okay no shirk is the same as asking Allah means two things yes let's discuss yes two things good colleagues he has a doctorate and I'm not even a cleric I 'm like this sis all the questions let's discuss the first is it true that the Prophet Muhammad is the name of Allah of course this must be studied according to sharia yes this is because it is related to monotheism that name is related to monotheism his statement and the position of Allah and the position of the Prophet Muhammad sallallahu alaihi wasallam so this is extraordinary yes his statement well we answer by ordinary people I'm an ordinary person that is very wrong fatally Muhammad is not the name of Allah but the name of a servant remember that is the name of his servant and noble messenger the best human being truly sent to people throughout the world the names of Allah have divine attributes that are not possessed by creatures the name of Allah belongs only to Allah says in surah Al-A'raf verse 180 and to Allah belong the best names so pray to him by name mentioning those names is clear yes so Allah have determined the names of Allah please pray to him by mentioning those names I'm sure there's no need for the ustaz to answer this the names of Allah know asmaul husna husna is permissible yes karim yes Malik yes those names are called asmaul husna such as Arrahman yes Alkaliq alalim and so on those names should not be equated with creatures in essence this is why Sufism has gone too far the name Muhammad is a human choice name not the name of Allah the name [Music] Muhammad which means praiseworthy the name shows the nature of creatures that are much praised even the nature of God who is most holy and all-powerful so humans can be praised but it is reasonable you work well you are extraordinary I salute you your struggle is so great that is praise praise is reasonable but not excessive praiseworthy Muhammad why is he called praiseworthy because he is honest and his behavior is good that is why his words are good his behavior is good and trustworthy is true that is why praiseworthy it is permissible but not the nature of God who is most holy and all-powerful even though it is praiseworthy but not not the nature of God his praiseworthy is not the nature of God prophet Muhammad sallallahu alaihi wasallam said "Remember I am [Music] Muhammad and I am Ahmad and I am Al what alqasinqasin yes Algim etc. His name is in many hadiths narrated by Bukhari Muslim meaning that Muhammad was the choice for the prophet of the end times not for Allah thirdly the prohibition on equating the name of a creature with the name of Allah absolutely in Islam naming a creature with Allah with an absolute name or attribute is shirk Allah says in surah Albaqarah verse 22 So do not make rivals to Allah in all aspects of the interpretation of scholars in all aspects of all life in any case should not make rivals including the name is it permissible for someone to be called Allah this Allah the name is not permissible yes it is permissible but please later in the afterlife will be accounted for but in the world immediately die there are two died not permissible yes maybe Araji read this perhaps the name Muhammad is mentioned together with the name Allah maybe yes this perhaps what made him even more convinced with the statement of some scholars saying that the name of the noble Prophet Muhammad because it is always mentioned together with Allah as in the call to prayer and the shahada maybe this there is hajj maybe yes but it does not mean that Muhammad is the name of Allah this shows the very high position of the Messenger of Allah not his divinity there is this how come it has gone too far that's why yesterday I said that today's Sufis are strange even though if we look at Sufi scholars, my God, it's amazing yes, it's really straight, Sufis, the scholars of the past were straight so it's permissible to follow their principles the same as the principles of the spiritual population it turns out but today's Sufis are strange I apologize many strange, yes , not all of them, but many are strange, yes, they make pacts, usually walk here and there, never pray, they are called sui people, yes, who meditate a lot in caves, then they pray through su people, who go up and down using an alpad because they always do dhikr, they are called supi, so it's strange now , yes, even statements like this, so it doesn't mean that in the shahada, Allah and the Prophet Muhammad are mentioned and then they are equal , even though the Prophet said in another hadith, "I am an ordinary human being , just a transmitter." Yes, so this is similar to the Christian belief, yes, asking the Prophet Isa, yes, it's okay, this person is God who translated into a human, this is already strange and what's strange is that I don't understand, he has wrongly believed in an Imam Mahdi from Indonesia, what's his name, he really believed it turned out to be wrong but he still followed it, that's what I'm also confused about, why do people still follow people who often say they are wrong, yes, they have even been reprimanded by the MUI, yes, in the past they even issued the names of spirits, yes, the names of spirits, if you want to ask the Arahiji, the name is a little addict, who knows the unseen and it turns out that in a certain event, many people have testified that they have to pay, yes , so it's extraordinary but they still follow the analysis of the utterance of the Prophet's name is the same as the name of Allah, this is a claim that has no basis in the Quran, authentic hadith or the consensus of scholars, the name Muhammad is not Asmaul Husna, the name of the Prophet himself forbids people to elevate him to the same level as God, the prophet himself is clear, don't let me be equal to God , even he really adheres to pure monotheism, this is even the learned Araji That actually leads people to polytheism, it's true what I said before, the more smart people there are, the more Islam has branches like this, so Araji should make his own Sufism, a branch of Sufism, Muhammad is God, that's all, so it's better like that because he said you can ask Muhammad because it's the same as asking God, see in the hadith narrated by Bukhari number 3445, don't be excessive in praising me, you can praise me but don't be excessive like the Christians praise Jesus, the son of Mary, Arji, I heard this [Music] so I'm angry with your words because you want to lead many [Music] people astray, so making the name of the Prophet as the name of Allah is a sugary trait or excessive and misleading the people, this is an important note, saying that the prophet's name Muhammad is the name of Allah without knowledge and evidence, yes, asbun, without knowledge, without evidence, where is the evidence, it is contradictory, all the names of Allah are clearly in it, don't make up things, it can be dangerous and misleading because what is likening a door to a bridge, likening a prophet to God, that's a door, that's a door enter it even though he did not say the prophet is not God but that is the entrance with the statement both may ask the Prophet he said because it is the same as God the same verse yes contradicts the creed of the experts of the sunnah wal jamaah that's why I said earlier Araji You create a new sect like the habibs that is a new sect the Baalawi [Music] sect and I will issue a study later in the end that the Baalawi teachings are not Islamic teachings yes the next one can be a form of excessive joke in glorifying the Messenger of Allah even though the Messenger of Allah forbade it was clear earlier the hadith yes in the hadith narrated by Bukhari number 3445 do not you exaggerate in praising me as the Christians praise Jesus son of Mary this is the hadith of Bukhari Muslim Bukhari that is a hadith that is generally authentic which is very clear my colleagues who have never received religious education understand that is what is called what we have discussed so far Allah is the key to closing knowledge from the spiritual side he speaks a lot of letters but the spirit of his version is not the version that we convey through evidence and rain yes but the spirits that are visible misleading, he can even see the names of all our souls, right? Those were the statements in the past that caused controversy, even his teacher, the cleric, said, "Not my teaching, that's a heretical teaching." Yes, the conclusion of the first chapter, yes, the conclusion of the old question, not to mention the second question, we will discuss it later. The name Muhammad is the name of a servant and apostle, not the name of Allah. It cannot be equated. The name of Allah has divine specialness and should not be equated with the name of a creature. The prophet Muhammad sallallahu alaihi wasallam is the best creature. The most noble human being but not God is equated with God and does not have the name of God. Well, I think that's the conclusion of the second answer to the second statement. My doctor's question underlines the doctor until Manyun emphasizes that intellectuals who are actually misleading ask through the intermediary of the Prophet Muhammad is the same as asking Allah. He said this is similar to the teachings of Habib Fakih muqadam. Ask for fakih muqadam. Habib said with various arguments that are made up so that it is not included in shirk. He said it is a statement that requires very strong clarification . The person concerned has a problem with his faith, yes, that is a sick faith because it concerns monotheism and the problem of shirk. Well, I will explain in this second chapter point. Be careful, the teachings of Sufism now. P shirk is a thin line of difference. Be careful, friends, we are not denying the teachings of Sufism if we see from the teachings, yes it is similar to what the Prophet did but now there is a language in the past there is no term Sufism Sufi right in the time of the Prophet there was no Islam alone there was no hardline Islam, the line is crooked line whatever line there is no term Sufism there is no that in the time of the Prophet the term today only if we look at the teachings if it is pure Sufism, well this is all the teachings but now it is different like Arjan Arazi earlier like the teachings of Abu Aos can control angels try how is this all sick this is sick faith yes the prophet can not control angels angels who come suddenly the Prophet hopes the angels come yes if indeed Allah does not agree not to be present yes well so in Islamic law asking directly to other than Allah is a supernatural matter in supernatural matters is a major shirk asking to other than Allah in supernatural matters supernatural matters because asking Allah is a major shirk but praying to Allah by mentioning an intermediary or tawasul there is indeed ikhtilaf there are differences of opinion among scholars but there are some that are the same see pay attention so be careful not with the excuse "Wow, even scholars are different." But be careful, this is a very subtle deception, let's be clear here, yes, I am not a scholar but I am forced to respond to what is agreed, what can I do, pay attention to the tawasul, there is something permissible for me, in a certain way I don't enter, you can try, but pay attention. Which one is permissible, tawasul with pious deeds, which is permissible, right, wait a minute, tawasul which is agreed upon by the ulama, what tawasul with the names of Allah is permissible, Karim, what else is there, Rahman, the name of tawasul is indirect, yes, Allah, there are names of Allah, tawasul, the names of Allah, may be agreed by the ulama of tawasul with pious deeds, what do you mean by the pious deeds that we do, well, yes, Allah, I have already helped a large family, Allah, I hope I am in trouble, perhaps because of my good deeds, you answered my prayer, well, that's just asking, that's not God's order, right? That's tawasul with our righteous deeds, tawasul, prayers for people who are still alive, well, I agree, I say tawasul is fine, but only point three, that's just tawasul with Allah's names, OK , other things, and so on, tawasul with our righteous deeds and tawasul to people who are still alive, yes, Rasul, I have a problem, because you are a prophet, please help me pray, it's permissible for me to do that while I'm alive, yes , this is a dispute. What's in dispute is that these arajin appear to have their own opinions regarding the Prophet's substance who has passed away is indeed at odds because there are people who say it's okay even though they have died with arguments we understand that everyone has a book, bring a book, so this is the need for mubasyirat because the books are all thick, even people who are astray bring a book, why does the Dajjal bring a book, there is in the hadith, he brings my teachings even though they were never taught by your ancestors, that 's what the Prophet Dajjal said, so it makes sense what was conveyed in the Mubasyirat Muhammad Qasim that the Dajjal is a Muslim and a true scholar, so it makes sense that many Muslims will apostatize, yes, like the teachings of Araji, like this, yes, bring evidence, his book is as big as a mountain, I don't have a book, there is only a translation because I can't read the original book, so it is clear that tawasul with the substance of the Prophet, a figure, let alone the muqadam fiqh, asking the grave, the muqadam fiqh can complete 73 wishes, his arrogance is extraordinary, people's prayers to Allah are not necessarily realized, there is a guarantee that coming to the muqadam fiqh can complete 73 wishes, this is shirk There are a lot of shirk, akbar akbar, akbar, akbar, akbar, akbar, akbar, akbar, akbar, akbar, akbar, akbar, almighty, great shirk, OK, let's look at the evidence of the Koran and the hadith of tawasul which are prescribed, O you who believe, fear Allah and look for wasilah, the way to get closer to Him, in Surah Al-Maidah, what is the interpretation, well, this is tawasul , this is wasilah , Ibn Kathir's way of interpreting the wasilah here is obedience. and righteous deeds are not substances , just try the logic, it's very simple, Allah has said, "Ask me directly, I'm closer than the caterpillar on your neck, that's the absolute thing, don't change it, interpret it continuously, well, this is developing in Islam like this, that's why the Almahdi's task is to return Islam to pure Islam, pure monotheism , so it's not the substance of Ibn Kathir's words, but obedience, then look at this hadith, the interpretation of the ulama, the interpretation is almost wrong, no one can teach the meaning. from the Koran, it is permissible to say that tawasul doesn't exist, it's all about obeying the hadith of tawasul, my friend, the hadith of Uthman bin Hunaib, when a blind person came to the Prophet asking to be healed, he taught him a prayer, O Allah, I beg you and put my trust in you with the Prophet with the name of Prophet Muhammad, in the surah Tirmidhi Ahmad and others, but this is not a prayer to the Prophet, try to pay attention but still pray to Allah, only mentioning the Prophet as an intermediary when he was still alive. The Prophet, for example, I saw Mas ee Sulh. I know Mas Sul is close to Allah by looking at his behavior. His tahajud never passed half an hour before the tahajud, the sunnah prayer used to be here. It's normal for me to be far from Allah because of shirk, for example, because I have a lot of sins, so I'm still alive, please help me with your good deeds, please pray for me, that's okay, that's how it was, maybe his deeds are so easy to Allah because his good deeds are so many. he asked for help "Oh Allah, please help Big Candra to solve this problem." Yes, because he is still alive , Sunnah scholars emphasize that this tawasul occurred when the Prophet was still alive, not after he died. For example, those who were blind were told to pray like this, O Allah, our Lord, yes [Music] and [Music] what ee and in the name of Muhammad as your apostle, yes, then I ask, let's say that his blindness was cured, for example, yes, that was when the Prophet was still alive and the Prophet also prayed for his problem there with the Prophet's prayer "O Allah, grant my prayer and also please grant the Prophet too, right? pray for me too." Well, these sentences are permissible as long as the Prophet is still alive , almost all of them, what are the scholars of Sunnah wal Jamaah, meaning yes, the next argument for the prohibition of shirk in Surah Alzin verse 18 and that mosques are only for Allah, so do not worship anyone with Allah, then in Surah Al-Maidah, verse 72, verily, whoever associates partners with Allah is haram for heaven. The view of the ulama on the verse, for example, is Imam Nawawi Sufism, it is permissible with good deeds and accompanied by them. pious people who are still alive, not with their substance, those who have died, even those who exist after our death, to the Prophet, what do you do, don't you, Prophet, I ask to be saved, but to Allah, O Allah, grant intercession to your prophet from your messenger, indeed the Prophet will intercede, but in the afterlife after the calculation is clear, not now, when the Prophet is dead, you cannot intercede later in the afterlife, Ibn Taimiyah Ibn Qayyim tawasul to the Prophet after his death. is heresy and if it is excessive then it is clear shirk Yes, Imam Asyaukan, Sufism is a shari'a if you ask directly to Allah, even though mentioning the names of Allah is permissible, the apostle to the names of Allah, so colleagues, the analysis is clear, it has been answered, yes , the analysis of the prophet, the name of Allah is not in the Quran, hadith, yes , and also the books of the consensus of scholars, it was very clear, the perspective of mubasyirat, well, because we are always guided by mubasyirat, how is this? The Quran has hadith, hadith, hadith, and all of them are permissible, letters or true dreams only apply as good news and cannot be used as a basis for faith that contradicts the Quran and contradictory hadiths, yes, those that do not contradict can strengthen, but many true dreams actually confirm that the Prophet Muhammad is not God, in many mubasyirat but a servant of Allah who is most loved by Allah and his people, for example in several dreams, ee, people in the world, including Muhammad Qasim's dream, he said "Always forbidden by Allah if there are people who praise him excessively as God or equate him as God, equate him as God, it is clear that there are many readings in many dreams, both Muhammad Qasim's dreams and other dreams that say more or less everything is only from Allah not from his creatures and does not need to ask for intermediaries from his creatures he only conveys not a place to depend on the Prophet Muhammad only conveys not a place to depend on remember that anyone even at the level of the Prophet is not a place to depend on Yes, the conclusion is good, it is clear I think there is not a single argument mentioned by Haji Hasyim SMA MH yes repent and do not listen to the teachings of raji anymore I see that the teachings of araji have deviated a lot everywhere even though he moves doctor even professor remember those strange groups of schools were also brought by famous figures figures who can read books figures who have mountains of books can be sheep herders can be pedicab drivers can be traveling traders who only make a profit of 10,000 a day it could be that they are the ones Allah loves who Allah guides to the truth of the path of Allah not scholars remember in a hadith the Messenger of Allah said "In fact, scholars at the end of time will be the worst creatures under the sky." Here is the proof of what the Prophet conveyed happened to Araji from they are the ones that slander arises, right, slander, slander against the Prophet and slander against Allah at the same time and teach heresy to the people so that they can ask the Prophet, yes, the Prophet, to forgive their servants for their sins, try to mess up until they fall into an extraordinary free fall, so I urge you to leave the arajin, yes, and this MUI should be the one who states this [Music] h [Music]