🛠️

Roosevelt's Defense of Lend-Lease Policy

Apr 10, 2025

President Roosevelt Defends Lend-Lease

Introduction

  • Date: December 17, 1940
  • Speaker: Franklin D. Roosevelt
  • Context: Press conference defending the Lend-Lease policy during World War II

Background

  • Neutrality Laws (1939):
    • Congress passed a law allowing trade with warring nations on a "cash and carry" basis.
    • Retained ban on war loans, affecting Britain’s ability to purchase from the U.S.
  • Lend-Lease Concept:
    • Devised by Roosevelt as Britain needed credit for munitions and materials.
    • Preceded by the "bases-for-destroyers" deal with Britain.

Key Points from Roosevelt's Press Conference

  • Defense Strategy:
    • Helping Britain is crucial for U.S. defense as it contributes to the survival of democracy.
    • U.S. should assist Britain to avoid having to engage in war itself.
  • Historical Example:
    • Recollection of 1914, illustrating the unexpected duration and economic implications of war.
  • Economic Opinion:
    • Past views held that war continuation depended on financial resources.

Lend-Lease Policy Explanation

  • Justification:
    • Orders from Britain enhance U.S. defense by boosting production facilities.
    • Providing support is essential, not just through repealing Neutrality Acts or monetary loans.
  • Alternatives to Monetary Gifts or Loans:
    • Options include converting British orders to American orders.
    • Lease or sell materials to Britain based on defense needs.
  • Eliminating the Dollar Sign:
    • Aim to remove emphasis on financial transactions in favor of gentleman’s obligations.

Analogy Used by Roosevelt

  • Garden Hose Example:
    • Lending neighbor a hose to put out a fire; expectation is to return or replace the hose, not monetary payment.
    • Illustrates the principle of lending aid without direct financial repayment.

Conclusion

  • Forward Steps:
    • Explore methods to maintain production and supply to Britain.
    • Any arrangement should prioritize American defense and mutual obligations.