Evaluating Sources Using the CRAAP Method

Introduction to the CRAAP Method

• CRAAP is an acronym for evaluating sources.
• Ensures research is:
  • Relevant
  • Accurate
  • Verifiable
  • Academically honest
• Helps differentiate between primary and secondary sources.

Components of the CRAAP Method

1. Currency

   • Timeliness of the source.
   • Consider:
     • Publication date
     • Latest revision or update
     • Outdated vs. current information

2. Relevance

   • Importance of the source to your research.
   • Key considerations:
     • Topic relation
     • Intended audience
     • Comparison with other sources for the best fit

3. Authority

   • Source of the information.
   • Evaluate:
     • Author credentials
     • Publisher or sponsor
     • Organizational respectability
     • URL indicators (e.g., .edu, .gov)

4. Accuracy

   • Reliability and truthfulness of the content.
   • Questions to ask:
     • Supporting evidence
     • Bibliography availability
     • Verification through other sources
     • Language tone (objective vs. biased)

5. Purpose

   • Reason behind the source's creation.
   • Assess:
     • Intentions (educate, inform, entertain, persuade)
     • Clarity of authorial intention
     • Possible biases and perspectives

Methods of Applying the CRAAP Test

• Check Mark Method

  • Record source information with citations.
  • Use statements under each criterion; mark existence with check marks.
  • Tallies indicate source reliability (high = good, low = reconsider).

• Rating System Method

  • Record source and citation.
  • Rate each criterion individually.
  • Tally ratings for a grand total (high = reliable, low = possibly unreliable).

Conclusion

• Begin investigations like an archaeologist, "digging" for truth.
• Channel mission: Help students build skills and teachers expand tools.
• Follow on social media and visit their website for more resources.