Fastest Way to Board an Airplane

Jul 12, 2024

Fastest Way to Board an Airplane

Introduction

  • Problem: Finding the fastest way to board an airplane.
  • Context: Explanation of why airlines use boarding groups and methods.
  • Key Question: Why are common boarding methods inefficient?

Common Methods of Boarding

Back-to-Front Boarding

  • Intuitive but Ineffective:
    • Solution: Fill the plane from back to front.
    • Issue: Causes delays due to full-stop stows, where everyone waits for one person to stow their bag.
  • Key Points:
    • High occurrence of full-stop stows.
    • Few pullaways (one queue into two) and parallels (multiple people stowing bags simultaneously).

Front-to-Back Boarding

  • Deliberately Inefficient:
    • Designed to waste time.
    • Result: Frequent full-stop stows and delays.
  • Economic Incentives:
    • First class boards first as a paid perk.
    • Loyalty programs influence boarding priorities.

Random Boarding

  • Older, Faster Method:
    • Method: Allow people to board in the order they arrive.
    • Advantages:
      • Increases chances of pullaways and parallels.
    • Disadvantages:
      • Can cause seat shuffles when passengers spill into the aisle.

Window-Middle-Aisle (WMA) Boarding

  • Organized But Slightly Faster:
    • Order: Board window seats first, then middle, then aisle.
    • Eliminates: Seat shuffles.
    • Key Findings:
      • Minor improvement over random boarding.
      • Main delays due to bag stowing.

Theoretically Fastest Method

  • Platonic Perfection:
    • Alternating rows, alternating sides, back-to-front.
    • Maximizes pullaways and parallels.
  • Real-World Limitations:
    • Human factors: Families, economic incentives, inability to follow instructions.
    • Impractical for real-world implementation.

Practical Improvements

  • Realistic Adaptation:
    • Modified perfect method: Board by side and row in groups of four.
    • Benefits:
      • Allows for boarding with families and friends.
      • Easier to implement for airlines.
      • Faster than current methods.

Conclusion

  • Final Thoughts:
    • Perfect methods are ideal but impractical.
    • Real-world adaptations can still significantly improve boarding efficiency.