Anthropocene Working Group identifies 1950s as the start
Environmental Attitudes vs. Pro-Environmental Behavior
Growth in environmental concern (EC) but a weak relationship with PEB
Pearson r for EC and PEB often ranges from 0.17 to 0.19 (small correlation)
Concern-behavior gap: Discrepancy between people’s environmental concern and their actions
Example: Bickman (1972) study on littering and behavioral inconsistency
Psychological Reasons for the Concern-Behavior Gap
Present Bias
Cognitive bias focusing on immediate benefits of depreciative behavior and immediate costs of PEB
Prioritize immediate rewards over future consequences
Solutions: Adopt a future-oriented mindset, think about the long-term impact on future generations, and feel better about taking action
Distrust of Others
Fairness perception: Reluctance to act sustainably if others are not
Environmental social trap: Many people acting selfishly exacerbate problems
Solutions: Refocus on personal responsibility, acknowledge collective impact, and discourage justifying depreciative behavior based on others' actions
Low Perceived Control and Efficacy
Belief that individual actions won’t significantly affect large-scale environmental problems
Pseudoinefficacy: Misconception that individual actions don’t matter
Solutions: Understand aggregate impact of individual actions, empower oneself with knowledge, and view sustainable actions as part of a broader movement
Empowerment Strategies
Recognize the contribution of individual actions to larger environmental goals
Engage in personal and political actions for sustainability
Address cognitive dissonance: Align concerns with actions by reducing depreciative behaviors and increasing PEB