Lecture Notes on Private Equity from the Perspective of Limited Partners
Introduction
Anan apologized for absence due to visa issues in Dubai.
Presenter is a partner at Triago, based in New York.
Focus of the session: understanding private equity from the perspective of limited partners (LPs).
Overview of Triago
Founded in 1992 to raise capital for European General Partners (GPs).
Expanded to New York and other regions (Asia, Middle East) to connect GPs with institutional investors.
Established a secondary practice in 1999 to assist LPs with liquidity options.
Current client focus: middle-market firms raising between $500 million to $3 billion in various sectors (buyout, venture, real estate, mezzanine, energy).
Case Study: Endowment and Foundation
Participants will role-play as private equity portfolio managers at endowments and foundations.
Case study examines a fictional endowment facing a denominator effect (overexposure to private equity).
Portfolio manager exploring options for reducing private equity share.
Key Issues Identified
Denominator Effect: Private equity's share of the portfolio is larger than desired.
Market Conditions: Initial reluctance to sell due to better prices a few years ago.
Secondary Transactions: Concerns about potentially disadvantageous pricing.
Trustee Considerations for Secondary Sales
Price Concerns: Expected discount from NAV and overall market conditions.
Transaction Timing: Secondary transactions are complex and time-consuming.
Confidentiality Issues: Impact on the reputation and future relationships with GPs.
Market Dynamics: What if a rush of sales floods the market?
Options for Portfolio Sale
Direct Auction: Invite multiple buyers for competitive pricing.
Pros: Potentially higher prices.
Cons: Confidentiality risks.
One-on-One Negotiation: Approach a single buyer.
Pros: Maintains confidentiality.
Cons: Risk of not achieving the best price.
GP Approach: Discuss transfer options with GPs directly.
Pros: May facilitate smoother transactions.
Cons: GPs may not prioritize sellers' interests.
Using an Agent: Engage a third-party advisor to facilitate the sale.
Pros: Better pricing and confidentiality.
Cons: Fees and potential conflicts of interest.
Buyer Perspective in Secondary Market
Types of Buyers:
Funds of Funds: Buying secondaries for better liquidity and to avoid J-curve effects.
Dedicated Secondary Funds: Focus on mature assets for quicker distributions.
Opportunistic Buyers: Other endowments and foundations looking for strategic opportunities.
Portfolio Analysis
Classifying Assets: Group funds into categories (e.g., venture vs. buyout).
Valuation Considerations: NAV valuation methods (DCF, comparables).
Market Pricing Dynamics: Inefficiencies and wide pricing differentials in secondary transactions.
Closing and Transfer Process
Typical Timeline: 10 to 14 weeks from start to finish.
Preparation, auction rounds, buyer due diligence, GP consent required.
Handling Rights of First Refusal: Strategies to navigate potential complications in the transfer process.
Market Outlook and Future Considerations
Efficiency of Secondary Market: Likely to remain negotiated due to GP control.
Long-term Predictions: Uncertain, but the balance of buyers and sellers will affect pricing dynamics.
Impact of Regulatory Changes: Potential for tighter regulations on placement agents and secondary transactions.
Conclusion
Importance of understanding both LP and GP perspectives in private equity.
Comprehensive analysis of the market, pricing, and strategic approaches essential for success in secondary transactions.