Understanding Private Equity for Limited Partners

Aug 4, 2024

Lecture Notes on Private Equity from the Perspective of Limited Partners

Introduction

  • Anan apologized for absence due to visa issues in Dubai.
  • Presenter is a partner at Triago, based in New York.
  • Focus of the session: understanding private equity from the perspective of limited partners (LPs).

Overview of Triago

  • Founded in 1992 to raise capital for European General Partners (GPs).
  • Expanded to New York and other regions (Asia, Middle East) to connect GPs with institutional investors.
  • Established a secondary practice in 1999 to assist LPs with liquidity options.
  • Current client focus: middle-market firms raising between $500 million to $3 billion in various sectors (buyout, venture, real estate, mezzanine, energy).

Case Study: Endowment and Foundation

  • Participants will role-play as private equity portfolio managers at endowments and foundations.
  • Case study examines a fictional endowment facing a denominator effect (overexposure to private equity).
  • Portfolio manager exploring options for reducing private equity share.

Key Issues Identified

  1. Denominator Effect: Private equity's share of the portfolio is larger than desired.
  2. Market Conditions: Initial reluctance to sell due to better prices a few years ago.
  3. Secondary Transactions: Concerns about potentially disadvantageous pricing.

Trustee Considerations for Secondary Sales

  • Price Concerns: Expected discount from NAV and overall market conditions.
  • Transaction Timing: Secondary transactions are complex and time-consuming.
  • Confidentiality Issues: Impact on the reputation and future relationships with GPs.
  • Market Dynamics: What if a rush of sales floods the market?

Options for Portfolio Sale

  1. Direct Auction: Invite multiple buyers for competitive pricing.
    • Pros: Potentially higher prices.
    • Cons: Confidentiality risks.
  2. One-on-One Negotiation: Approach a single buyer.
    • Pros: Maintains confidentiality.
    • Cons: Risk of not achieving the best price.
  3. GP Approach: Discuss transfer options with GPs directly.
    • Pros: May facilitate smoother transactions.
    • Cons: GPs may not prioritize sellers' interests.
  4. Using an Agent: Engage a third-party advisor to facilitate the sale.
    • Pros: Better pricing and confidentiality.
    • Cons: Fees and potential conflicts of interest.

Buyer Perspective in Secondary Market

  • Types of Buyers:
    • Funds of Funds: Buying secondaries for better liquidity and to avoid J-curve effects.
    • Dedicated Secondary Funds: Focus on mature assets for quicker distributions.
    • Opportunistic Buyers: Other endowments and foundations looking for strategic opportunities.

Portfolio Analysis

  • Classifying Assets: Group funds into categories (e.g., venture vs. buyout).
  • Valuation Considerations: NAV valuation methods (DCF, comparables).
  • Market Pricing Dynamics: Inefficiencies and wide pricing differentials in secondary transactions.

Closing and Transfer Process

  • Typical Timeline: 10 to 14 weeks from start to finish.
    • Preparation, auction rounds, buyer due diligence, GP consent required.
  • Handling Rights of First Refusal: Strategies to navigate potential complications in the transfer process.

Market Outlook and Future Considerations

  • Efficiency of Secondary Market: Likely to remain negotiated due to GP control.
  • Long-term Predictions: Uncertain, but the balance of buyers and sellers will affect pricing dynamics.
  • Impact of Regulatory Changes: Potential for tighter regulations on placement agents and secondary transactions.

Conclusion

  • Importance of understanding both LP and GP perspectives in private equity.
  • Comprehensive analysis of the market, pricing, and strategic approaches essential for success in secondary transactions.