Transcript for:
Understanding Nano Photonics and Wave Equations

Hello everyone, welcome back ah in the last  lecture we were talking about the the scientific   problem in nano photonics. So, when we  have a distribution of ah permittivities in   certain region of space how do we solve for the  electromagnetic response? And I mentioned that   this essentially it essentially involves solving  Maxwell's equations, but how do we solve that?   So, to do that we have to essentially solve the  wave equation. So, if you look at the Maxwell's   equation the curl equations here you have two  of these curl equations curl of H and curl of   E and when you combine these two you get  what is known as a wave equation this is   a wave equation for ah free space ok. So, how do  we get this equation? So, since this is a central   part of nano photonics I would like to take  a little bit of time try to derive this.   So, you might have already done this, but I  just want to go over this one more time. So,   that you are familiar with the assumptions that we  are making and what is the role of each term ok.   So, ah all of you definitely  are familiar with wave equation   which is of this form this is essentially a  second order partial differential equation. So,   you have the 2nd derivative in time  this is a 2nd derivative in time   and. Sorry.   I have my students here. So, if they are asking  me question. So, let me yeah what is this?   Student: Sir it should be close to  that H by (Refer Time: 01: 47).   Well why why should it be H? It can be electric  field as well you can have the electric ok. So,   yeah the wave equation has two forms; one is the  wave equation in terms of electric field and the   other one is ah the wave equation for the magnetic  field. So, you can have either of these two   things we can derive them. So, it depends yeah. So, what I will do today is I will derive the wave   equation for the electric field and I leave it as  an exercise for you to derive the wave equation of   the magnetic field you can do that ok and it will  be similar in form. So, that is a nice exercise   yeah thank you so much Sahan yeah. So, ah yeah we  have the second derivative in time on the right   and we have the second derivative in the space. So, this is a Laplacian operator;   Laplacian operator which is essentially dou  square by dou x square plus dou square by dou   y square plus dou square by dou z square this is  a Laplacian operator in the Cartesian coordinates.   So, the wave equation essentially relates the  2nd order 2nd derivative in space and ah and   time. So, through the velocity term. So, I mean I leave it as a small exercise   for you to check that the dimensions match  out. So, the coefficient of here is going   to be the velocity term ok this is the wave  equation. So, how do we get this wave equation?   So, we will start with the Curl equations  given by Maxwell and we will also make   an assumption that the magnetization is  essentially 0. So, we will only take ah B   is going to be mu H mu naught H ok  this is the assumption we are making.   So, with that I have curl of E which is  given by second ah the partial derivative   of B with respect to time and that will be  minus the ah the partial derivative of the   magnetic field with respect to time in the second  derivations second equation is simple enough. So,   what we will do now is we will take the curl of  the first equation. So, let me take curl of a. So,   what I want to do is take curl. So, I assume that  you have gone through a course on vector calculus   and you know what curl divergence all mean. If not I would encourage you to take it because   these equations this vector calculus is very  fundamental to a lot of areas of engineering.   So, you should take I mean it will be just  a you know month long course on vector   calculus you should take it there will be lot of  resources that are available in that context.   So, let us consider curl of the  first equation. So, I have curl of E.   So, I will take a curl of that and that on the  left hand side. So, that will give you on the   right hand side minus mu naught I will take the  derivative out and I will say curl of H, right.   So, I know what is curl of H from the second  equation the B here. So, that will be equal to   mu naught ah since the this is ok let us  take the 2nd derivative. So, so mu naught   2nd derivative of ah D with respect to time plus  the minus mu naught yeah the 1st derivative of ah   J with respect to time. So, this is a this should  be instead of a plus it should be a minus here   as well. So, this is what you get right. And you also know that from the constitutive   relations we know that D is equal to  epsilon naught E plus polarization P.   So, we can substitute and expand, so what  you will end up getting is minus mu naught   epsilon naught dou square E by dou t square minus   mu naught dou square P by dou t square  minus mu naught dou J by dou t.   So, you already see that the left hand side  we are already seeing that you know second   derivative in terms of the time. Second derivative  electric field in terms of time that we see on   the right hand side of the wave equation ok,  in addition we have the few other terms ok.   So, how do we look at this? So, we will put  it back together instead of in my handwriting   its I have type set it here. So, essentially  curl curl of E is this term ok and to simplify   the left hand side we will use a vector identity  which is essentially given by this. So, the curl   of vector field will be given by ah the first  term it consisting of divergence of the field   and the second term consisting of Laplacian. So, it turns out that if you are talking about   free space or ah region of space where there is  no free charges. So, this rho f means free charge   if there are no free charges then rho f is 0 and  also if the epsilon does not vary significantly   over the wavelength ah scale, then you can  actually consider divergence of E to be 0   because of that we will be able to simplify  the equation to this form on the bottom here.   So, you see that you have the familiar ah part  which is the Laplacian on the left hand side and   the first 2nd derivative of electric field in  terms of time, but there are a couple of other   terms ok. If you consider let us say free space by  which we mean there are basically no there is no   polarization and also the there are no free  currents J is 0 are 0 in free free space.   If you consider this scenario the equation  reduces to Laplacian of E is equal to mu naught   epsilon naught dou square E by dou t square  ok. And the solutions to these equation this   equation are essentially what are known as plane  waves, we will talk about them in a little while,   but ah figuratively the solution  is going to be like ah this.   Now, you have the electric field which is confined  to a plane and it oscillates as a function of time   and magnetic field will be perpendicular to that.  So, you have electric field and magnetic field   which are perpendicular to each other and they  are both simultaneously perpendicular to the   propagation direction. So, this is what we call as  a plane wave which is a solution of electromagnet   the wave equation. And we will see  that we will study a little bit   more detail in the ah coming sections ah. But so what is the speed of this wave right,   how fast does it propagate? So, for that we have  to compare the coefficient of the time derivative.   So, in the original case we had ah one over  v square right velocity square and in the   in the equation that we solved  we got mu naught epsilon naught.   So, if you can define the velocity  of a wave in terms of velocity of   the wave or of the E M wave is going  to be 1 over root of epsilon naught   mu naught ok. And if you look at the terms  you know we mentioned what is epsilon naught   and what is mu naught in the earlier lecture.  You will see that if you compute these numbers   you will end up getting equal to constant C  which is 3 into 10 power 8 the speed of light.   So, whenever you have electromagnetic waves  propagating in vacuum we have ah that the speed   with which they propagate is known as the speed of  light which is dependent only on the fundamental   constants permittivity and permeability of  free space right. So, this is a speed of light.   So, this is how electromagnetic wave propagates  ok, this is the solution of a wave equation.   Now, what happens to let us say regular  medium? Let us say I take a piece of glass   how does the electromagnetic wave propagate  in that? So, if you go back and look at the   original equation here what would change when you  consider glass? Ok. Will glass have any currents?   No because glass is insulator it cannot conduct  any current, so we will put the J term to be 0.   What will happen to the P, the polarization will  there be a polarization when you consider glass?   And if you look back you will recall that  glass can actually have some polarization   right we said the polarization P is given by ah  certain susceptibility epsilon naught chi times E   right that is what we did in the last lecture. So,  we have to consider polarization we cannot make it   0 now. What is the impact of this? Ok. So, if I substitute for P I will get   mu naught epsilon naught chi dou square E by  dou t square ok. So, now what I can do is I can   take the right hand side and I can take common  terms out. So, right hand side of the equation   I will take let us say epsilon naught mu naught  and this is 1 and the second term has a chi. So,   I will take one plus chi dou  square E by dou t square.   And this particular term we have already  introduced which we call as a relative   permittivity ok. So, what this is telling you is  the wave equation has a similar form to that of   vacuum. Now, if you take a wave equation in let us  say any dielectric media it has the same form only   addition is that you have this additional term  of relative permittivity. So, what does it imply?   What is the presence of permittivity show  us? Well we said that the coefficient is   related to the speed of the wave. So, in the previous case we said the   coefficient was you know 1 over mu naught epsilon  naught, but if you have a wave in a medium in a   dielectric medium what happens? Well the velocity  now is modified, its no longer going to be C,   but the velocity is going to be C by root of  epsilon r ok and more commonly this is known as   root of r is denoted by refractive index n ok So, this is a refractive index.   So, when you have electromagnetic wave propagating  in a medium any dielectric medium these are simple   dielectrics ok which ah let us assume that  the they do not have any losses we will get   into that in the next week. When you have a simple  dielectric the wave essentially slows down and the   ratio of the speeds is a refractive index ok this  is a simple first approximation of what happens.   And I must also emphasize that we have made  some assumptions when I said P is going to be   epsilon naught chi times E this is a simplifying  assumption the reason is there are some materials   which are anisotropic; that means, the way a  wave propagates in the one direction let us say   x direction the speed with which it propagates  is going to be different from the speed with   which it propagates in the y direction. There are some examples like calcite   ok where this they have an anisotropic response,  if you have an anisotropic response then we have   to actually consider polarization in a slightly  more complicated form. So, now, in this case the   polarization ah the susceptibility is not going to  be a scalar previous case the susceptibility was   a number, but when you have a anisotropic medium  we will have to consider what is known as tensor.   So, you have scalar which is simple number  a vector which is a array of numbers   and then the higher ah form of that is what is  tensor which is basically two dimensional its   matrix ok that is why I represent ij. So, its  a matrix of susceptibility numbers in various   directions. So, we call it a tensor and then  we have to compute ok its much more involved   we will not get into it right now except  you know when I talk about meta materials   I will talk about the anisotropic response ok. Ah The other assumption is I am making is that   we are dealing with linear medium. What do I mean  by linear? Well it turns out that the P which is   a function of E direct linearly dependent on  E is an assumption you can have higher order   terms the polarization will also be dependent on  the square of the electric field and the cube of   the electric field, it can happen and so on  it can have higher order responses and these   are what are known as non-linear responses ok. And this leads to a lot of interesting effects.   So, for example, here this  is a 2nd order susceptibility   and this is a 3rd order susceptibility and  so on and the presence of the 2nd and 3rd   order susceptibilities can actually lead to very  interesting effects ah like harmonic generation   and so on there is an entire field of non-linear  optics which I think probably had I think a few   Nobel prizes in that domain which has which  is based on this higher order responses,   right. So, in this course we will not really  get into the non-linear ah phenomena.   So, what we will do is ah let us look at that  you know the dielectric constant right or rather   the effective index in a little bit more of  detail. So, in the previous slide I said its   a the ratio of the speed, it seems like ok we are  all familiar with refractive index of glass being   1.5 silicon being 3.1 and so on. But it turns out  that the refractive index is not a simple number,   but it exhibits a dispersion the technical  term is dispersion which essentially means that   we have the refractive index which  is a function of wavelengths ok.   So, on the x axis I am showing you function or  rather x axis you have the wavelength on the y   axis you have refractive index. So, what  you are seeing here is various materials   in their corresponding refractive indices. And  immediately you see that the refractive index   is a is a kind of you know it shows a variation  ok, it depends on the material there are some   materials where its more or less constant and  then some others which is not. Now, for example,   on the top here the blue is germanium ok and  germanium has a refractive index of about 0.8 eV.   The green is gallium arsenide which has a sorry  band gap band gap its not refractive index I am   sorry germanium has a band gap of 0.8 ev and  the gallium arsenide has a band gap of 1.42 eV   and similarly if I come down if I look at gallium  nitride which this has a which has a band gap   of about 3.4 eV and finally, you have ah silicon  dioxide which has a band gap of ah Eg of GaN this   is this is eg of SiO 2 ok which is about 9 eV. And what you see is   the band gap changes as a function of sorry the  refractive index is invested related to the band   gap ok. So, this is a interesting observation  and why does this happen and so on we can   talk about it in the subsequent lectures ok.  So, I just want to leave you with a thought.   So, ah generally when I talk of optics or  photonics or electromagnetic we think of   it as a separate domain and its sometimes scary  because there is a lot of mathematics involved.   But I want to underline the the unifying or the  similarity between various you know domains for   example, optics or electromagnetics is really  very closely related to the electronics that   many of you are familiar with. If you look back  at how the electromagnetic waves are generated   you must have heard about antennas which  generate electromagnetic waves, we will   consider that in a little bit of we will show a  few things about that in the ah down the line.   But right now if you have electric ah charges  that are moving they produce electric fields.   So, essentially motion of charges electrons  give you light the light generation part. And   analogously when you have an electric field  incident on a material it is going to make   the charges move the the the electric field  in the light or electromagnetic wave will make   the charges move and that is light detection. So, you see that the electrons and the photons are   very intimately related they are not completely  different domains they are ah related by some very   fundamental physics. Here I am listing out a few  parameters to just emphasize this you know ah you   must have heard about the wave particle duality,  right. So, you can treat electrons and waves as   electrons and photons as waves or particles ok  both are valid and there are certain regimes where   particle picture is useful and certain other  regimes where the wave picture is useful.   So, what you see is here let us say energy the  tabulated a few things for electrons and photons   and you see that the energy of electron is  essentially you know given by ah p square   by 2m. So, it is related to square of momentum and  this is called the parabolic dispersion if you are   familiar with electronics you must have heard  about the parabolic dispersion for electrons.   Whereas, if you come to photons the dispersion  is slightly different, its a linear dispersion   the energy is linearly related to the momentum ok And similarly yeah momentum you have   mv mass into velocity this is a classical picture  if you look at the quantum picture it is h cross k   and similarly for photons you can talk of  momentum in the quantum picture which is h cross k   or you can also define in terms of de Broglie  wavelength I mean rather than h by lambda   which is essentially what de Broglie relation is  and the wavelength of course, you can rearrange.   So, what I want to emphasize is that ah the  behavior of electrons and photons is quite similar   ok, electrons are governed by Schrodinger  equation which is essentially a second order   partial differential equation wherein you have the  2nd derivative in space and 1st derivative in time   that is the Schrodinger equation. In photons or electromagnetic waves   we deal with the wave equation which is again a  second order differential equation, but this time   it is a second second order in both space and  time ok that is a slight difference, alright.   So, ah this is where I will stop,  I will take a few questions yeah.   Student: How does the wavelength  or other parameters compared for   both electrons and photons? Yeah that was a very interesting   question ah one of the student was asking about  how does these parameters compare ok for let us   say electrons and photons are they similar  in range or not ok. Well, electrons have ah   much higher I mean you can accelerate electrons  to much higher energies compared to photons,   if you take a photon the typical let us say  energy in the visible range is going to be about   ah few eV let us say 2 to 3 eV that is in the  visible domain ok or even I would say 1 to 3 eV ok   that is the energy of a photon ok ah. Just remember I am talking in eV units   its much more easier to deal with energy in this  way, if you talk of joules we will have to talk   of 10 power minus 19. So, I would encourage  you to actually try to figure out how to   ah convert between wavelength you know  various units let us say nanometers to you   know eV to centimeter inverse and so on the  various units and you should be comfortable   ok that is easier it makes your life easier So, the photon energy is typically 1 to 3 ev   whereas, electrons can be accelerated  for example, you know I mentioned an SEM.   So, where in the energy of an  electron can be up to 100 kv   ok it can be very high, it depends on how much you  accelerate to or you can talk of the wavelength   the wavelength of photon in the visible range  is about ah let us say the center wavelength is   500 nanometers whereas, ah ah the wavelength  of an electron can be much much smaller ok.   And this has some implications we will talk about  when we are talking about the diffraction limit,   alright. So, yeah so, there are  the numbers are quite different,   but the underlying phenomena has many similarities  ok, similar to you might have when you studied   quantum mechanics you might have studied  about tunneling of electrons. You can talk   of a similar concept of photons where you know  tunneling of electromagnetic waves and there is   ah forbidden regions and so on ok. So, yeah they  are related yeah. Anything else? If not yeah.   Thank you so much for your attention and I will  see you in the next lectures, take care bye.