Debating the Canon of Scripture

Mar 17, 2025

Lecture Notes: Responding to Dr. Gavin Ortlund on the Canon of Scripture

Introduction

  • The speaker is responding to Protestant apologist Dr. Gavin Ortlund.
  • The discussion involves the canon of scripture in the early church, following a podcast appearance.

Critique of Dr. Ortlund's First Video

  • Dr. Ortlund only responded to a 60-second clip from the podcast.
  • The speaker claims Ortlund agrees with the Catholic position without realizing it.
  • Ortlund spends most of his video discussing early church fathers but misses the core Catholic argument.

Points of Contention

  • Two major claims contested by Ortlund:
    1. Protestant canon can't be found in the first 1500 years of church history.
    2. Catholics and Protestants have always disputed the Old Testament.
  • Speaker argues there was no dispute in the early church about Old Testament books.

Early Church and the Old Testament

  • In the first 300 years, there was no dispute about Old Testament books among Christians.
  • The Catholic Encyclopedia is cited to show the early church used both protocanonical and deuterocanonical books in the same way.
  • The speaker argues against Ortlund's claim that the canon was only settled at the Council of Trent, citing earlier councils and papal actions.

Jerome's Influence and Misinterpretations

  • Jerome's stance on the deuterocanonical books evolved over time, initially rejecting and later accepting them as scripture.
  • Jerome submitted to church authority, which supported the deuterocanonical books.
  • Protestants are criticized for selectively using Jerome's earlier skepticism.

Protestant Positions and Historical Consistency

  • Speaker challenges Protestants to explain why they reject Old Testament deuterocanonical books but accept the New Testament's equivalent.
  • Points out that Protestant Bibles included these books until the late 19th century.

Scholarship and Historical Evidence

  • References to contemporary scholarship supporting Catholic positions on the canon.
  • Early church councils and figures are shown to use deuterocanonical books as scripture.

Conclusion and Challenges

  • The speaker invites further dialogue with Dr. Ortlund and Wesley Huff.
  • Encourages a debate or discussion on the topics covered.

Summary

  • The speaker presents a detailed critique of Dr. Ortlund's videos, focusing on historical evidence and interpretations regarding the canon of scripture.
  • Emphasizes the consistency in the use of deuterocanonical books throughout early church history.