Comparing Dust Collection Performance

Jan 21, 2025

Dust Collection Shootout: Low Profile Dust Deputy vs. Dust Stopper

Introduction

  • Recent discovery of the low profile Onida Dust Deputy, touted to have 50% more CFM than competitors.
  • Decided to compare it with a similar product, the Dust Stopper.
  • Unboxed the Deluxe Kit of the Dust Deputy, although only the top part is necessary for setup.

Setup Details

  • Included Items:
    • Wheel assemblies (not used in the test)
    • Hose for shop vac
    • Fittings for shop vac and Dust Deputy
    • Seals for lid and anti-static feature
    • Metal tape for assembly, considered controversial in effectiveness.
  • Assembly:
    • Rubber seals placed underneath and around the Dust Deputy lid.
    • Mistakenly placed rubber before attaching metal component, had to redo.
  • Tools Used:
    • Rigid 10-gallon, 6-horsepower shop vac used for testing.

Testing Methodology

  • Airflow Measurement:
    • Anemometer used to measure CFM (cubic feet per minute).
    • Calculations input for pipe sizes.
    • Aim to measure airflow through cyclone separators.

Results

  • Vacuum Measurements:
    • Vac by itself: 182 CFM
    • Vacuum with hose: 133 CFM (50 CFM loss through the hose)
  • Separator Performance:
    • Dust Stopper: 84 CFM
    • Low Profile Dust Deputy: 108 CFM
  • Additional Testing:
    • Both units tested for dust collection efficiency using saw dust and debris from a bandsaw.
    • Both separators prevented dust from reaching the vacuum filter.

Conclusion

  • Low Profile Dust Deputy showed higher CFM compared to Dust Stopper.
  • Anemometer setup and conditions can affect measurements.
  • Both products effectively kept the vacuum clean during the test.
  • Price difference: Dust Deputy is more expensive if purchased with additional components.
  • Encouragement to viewers for feedback and discussion.

Final Thoughts

  • Tests suggest notable performance differences.
  • Small sample size limits conclusions, but initial results are promising.
  • Call to action for viewer engagement and feedback.

Note

  • Test conditions not perfectly controlled—factory conditions likely differ.
  • Consider future tests to expand upon these initial findings.