Addison’s

Sep 24, 2024

1790s Foreign Policy and Jay's Treaty

Overview

  • The focus in the 1790s was on foreign policy rather than domestic issues.
  • The U.S. needed to define its international role and prove it could protect itself and its assets.

Neutrality Proclamation of 1793

  • Issued by Washington to avoid involvement in European conflicts, particularly the French Revolution.
  • The French Revolution had become a radical and violent affair.
  • The U.S. declared neutrality to avoid choosing sides but continued trading, except in war material.

War Material

  • Defined as anything used for waging or supporting a war.
  • Included guns, ammunition, and materials like iron and steel.

British Violations of American Neutrality

Maritime Issues

  • Britain ignored American neutrality by stopping U.S. ships and seizing cargo.
  • They engaged in impressment, kidnapping American sailors to serve in the British Navy.
  • Both Britain and France wanted full trade, leading to violations.

Northwest Indian War

  • The British armed and encouraged native attacks on U.S. settlers.
  • They operated from forts on American soil, violating the Treaty of Paris (1783).

Jay's Treaty

  • Negotiated by John Jay to address British violations.
  • Washington did not trust Jefferson to negotiate due to his pro-French stance.

Key Points of Jay's Treaty

  1. Britain agreed to remove troops from American soil.
  2. U.S. gained 'most favored nation' status with Britain.
  • The treaty did not address issues of neutral trade or impressment.
  • Seen as a failure by both the Federalists and Democratic Republicans.

Political Impact

  • The treaty prevented a likely disastrous war with Britain.
  • Washington faced heavy criticism, affecting his popularity.
  • It was pivotal in forming political parties, with Federalists supporting it and Democratic Republicans opposing it.

Consequences

  • Highlighted divisions within the country.
  • Set the stage for future conflicts and policies regarding international relationships.

Conclusion

  • The treaty averted war but fomented internal political divisions.
  • Impressment was temporarily reduced, but not formally halted, setting the stage for future tensions.

Looking Forward

  • The lecture ends with a segue into the subsequent presidency and its implications for U.S. foreign policy.