Transcript for:
Paleolithic Era Lecture Notes

Hello all welcome back! Here is  our next class module for you.   This is going to be on the Paleolithic. Now, I  may have said this before but as a general rule   we're gonna try to keep the actual  lectures or the narrated PowerPoints   somewhere in between say a total of two to three  hours, and that's because I want to try to leave   time for you guys to do the readings and the work  and try to keep that all within the time frame   of what course hour credits would be. So,  this is a pretty long one: Paleolithic is   a very broad span of time there's  a lot of stuff going on and   I happen to be madly in love with it, so hopefully  you guys will like it too, and there's a lot   of things that really set the stage, in the  Paleolithic, for things that we will see later   on. Yes, I put another little 3d image in that  doesn't really have anything to do with the class,   but I saw it and I thought he was adorable, and it  reminded me of all those old movies where you see,   you know, caveman running around  with dinosaurs, so I thought:   okay well let's give a shout out to that.  So, there you go. All right, let's move on... So, we've just got one card  up for this class this week,   but there's a lot of stuff kind of jam-packed  in there. We don't have the images and   concepts really divided up on this one, but since  there's not a lot of images you need to remember   I think this should do pretty okay for you.  Again, however you want to use this to study   is entirely up to you: you could print it out  and then sort of write your notes on it or you   could take a screenshot of it and then write  your notes in a notebook the old-fashioned way,   however you want to do it is fine with me. You  can copy and paste into a word processor program,   type it up on your phone, however you want to do  it's entirely up to you, just make sure you are   paying attention to these things and it's going  to make sure that the quiz goes nice and easy and   quick for you. One other thing I want  to point out, way on the bottom there,   the last thing on that list, don't forget your  notes from the terms and examples PowerPoint,   that is going to come into  play on your quiz as well. So right now we're going to be talking  about uh, the Paleolithic era. Paleolithic   means "old stone" okay, "paleo"  is old and "lithic" is stone.   The Paleolithic era is broken down largely  into three periods, I know there's four here   but uh, Solutrean is, is, pretty much accepted now  to be uh, really part of the Magdalenian. So it's   it's not really um, it's not really a separate  thing anymore, but I leave it in there just in   case you guys are doing your own research and you  happen to find a source that means it mentions   Solutrean and then you're like but hey where the  heck does that fit in, that's where it fits in.   The three main ones that we're going  to look at are Aurignacian, Gravettian   and Magdalenian. Now I'm never going  to ask you to remember dates because   I don't feel that anything that can be easily  looked up is something that you need to remember As long as you remember the order that they come  in: Aurignacian is first then comes Gravettian   and then comes Magdalenian, as I say, we're  not going to talk about Solutrean at all,   and that's pretty easy to remember because it's  in alphabetical order "a,g,m". Now each of them   have different things that are happening  in them" Aurignacian is where we first get   cave art it's where we first get a lot of the  evidence of habitation by humans in caves,   the paintings, handprints, etc. Gravettian  is when you get you start to get a lot of um   figures in addition to, especially fertility  figures, in addition to the handprints etc and   Magdalenian is when you start getting  some really advanced stuff. You start   getting a lot of decorated weapons, you start  to...getting stuff that looks like it might be   pointing towards some sort of spiritual  or religious beliefs a lot of people   say that's the beginning of animism  in, in human existence but who knows Now this is what I'm talking about with  hand prints. There's actually two varieties   but the first one that shows up uh, are these  positive hand prints and the positive hand   prints is is very, you know, much like  somebody just dips their hand into um pigment and then just sticks it up on the  wall. Now, though the slides that you just saw   were positive hand prints just on a wall along  with some other symbols and things like that,   sometimes we find them grouped together in a very  specific and purposeful uh, order or organization.   This here is the first cave we're going to look  at, it's in Chauvet France... most of the caves   we're going to look at are in France because  that's where the quote-unquote "good stuff" is.   It just lasts better there um, and they're  the prettiest ones, so you tend to... and air   quotes "prettiest"... so you tend to want to show  those especially in a survey class when you don't   have a lot of time to look at stuff. If you're  having a hard time seeing the hand prints um,   you can kind of make out the little  fingers here and there's the little thumb okay, here's the (didn't really show too good)  same thing here and there's a little thumb   you can kind of start to see them a little bit and again, that positive handprint is just taking  the right hand, because most people back then just   like today seem to be right hand dominant, right  into that pigment and put it up onto the wall.   And interesting things happens when you look  at other things in the cave. Chavez seems to be   very much connected with bears and  bear imagery... they don't eat bears   but they do seem to have a reverence for  them. There's a place in Chauvet cave   where there's just like a bear skull that's  put up on um, like a little shelf of of uh stone I guess you could say, um, the bear clearly  didn't die there, it was clearly placed there   uh, so that among with all of the other cave  bear images seem to suggest that they have a very   strong connection with bears and I superimposed  an outline of a bear that is also found in Chauvet   and what I think you see is that it does  appear to be lining up pretty well...   I mean the placement of the leg is a little  off so the leg would be over here I guess   um, just draw another leg in there  right, but it does appear to look   like some kind of an animal figure and  since Chauvet is known for its bears   well that might make sense. So you say well, why  would all of these people want to come together   and make a hand image of a bear... well we  kind of have things like that today don't we?   Where our sports teams and our colleges  are named after, you know, we have mascots   and usually those mascots are big important  kind of animals right? We don't have a football   team that's named the baby squirrels, we  don't have a, maybe a little league team,   but you don't have a baseball team that's  like the cute and fluffy bunnies right?   We have the Bears we have, uh you know, I... we're  the Sharks right? We're the SUNY Suffolk sharks   um, it's always something that's sort of  impressive in some way and why do we do that? Well   because we want to invoke authority. We want  to invoke a feeling of, of power and strength   and you find that in a lot of tribal cultures  as well. Of course the Native Americans   they have um, very specific relationships with  animals and again it's this idea that you can   share the attributes thereof, so it kind of makes  sense um, that you would find a tribe of hunters   who want to associate, or even just the entire  tribe, who want to associate with something   big and strong that they find impressive  and maybe that they revere a little bit Speaking of bear images here is one right  here now. We talked about style words before   and you remember we had naturalistic, abstract,   and non-objective... which one is this? Is  this naturalistic, abstract or non-objective?   Well while you think about that, let me help  you out. You know it can't be non-objective   because non-objective is "not an object" and we  can clearly see that this is the front of a bear   so it's clearly not non-objective, which  leaves us with naturalistic or abstract.   So which one do you think it is Now if you said naturalistic consider  the following: naturalistic has to look  like the thing, but it also has to have all the  features in place right? So bear: two eyes or   at least one eye if it's a profile... we don't  have that, they don't have that in this bear.   This bear is basically just an outline, so he is  an abstraction. This is an abstraction of a bear   so we know that it's not  talking about an actual bear,   it's talking about some aspect of bear  or some sort of spiritual idea of bear Now, if we look at the line  and what's actually depicted,   the places where it's most  pronounced...(it) doesn't have legs  but the face is very strong, the  mouth is very strong and the hump right, is very pronounced as well and if you think about it, what what's  the part of a bear that you could respect   or fear the strength of? The bear right,  and the fact the bear can eat you.   So bears aren't known for their speed, so  you don't need the legs, and sure enough   they haven't put in any legs . Bears aren't known  for their keen eyesight and eyes aren't well   known to help with strength so... he looks  very surprised... but no eyes there right but a bear can eat you and snarl and be loud,   we've got that and a bear is very big and very  strong and certainly the hump on the bear is   something that's very impressive and makes it  look very big. I don't know how much they know   about the musculature of bears, but humps also  help with the big, massive strength of bears. So   a couple of things about this: we know that it's  some sort of spiritual bear, a symbol of bear... In the hump we have these three marks... those three marks are non-objective remember those because those will come back One of the things that we use to try to understand   symbols is called "ethnographic  comparison"... "ethnographic   comparison" And an ethnographic comparison  is when you know about a different culture so you try to compare the culture you  don't know to the one that you do know.   Usually, there has to be some kind  of connection; either the one group,   the earlier group will grow into the later group  or the later group maybe um, you know supplanted   the earlier group or there's trade going on or  something like that. Now, we're in France... Arguably, arguably, you can draw a connection between these  guys and the much, much, much later on Celts... because the earliest celts will go around and kind of grow  out of different regions in Europe. There might be a connection there. With these really, really early cultures you  can kind of get away with using anybody because   technically, you know, anybody in Europe could  have grown out of these French people in these   caves... they're not French yet but that's where  the caves are... So anyhow um, what is interesting   is that if you look at early Celtic and if  you look at Greek cultures, both of them   have the bear as a very important  part of their belief system Now, both the Celtic Artio and the Greek  Artemis have to do with um, the ideas of life   and fertility uh, in the case of Artemis there  is a, um, I guess you could say ceremony where   priestesses will dress up in bear  clothing. In the case of Artio,   whose name I'm confident I'm pronouncing  horribly wrong, uh she is associated directly   with bears and also fertility uh, she'll  actually, very much like a bear, she's she uh is associated with the spring because  she'll go to... she sleeps all through winter   and then wakes up in spring where she brings  all the flowers back and things like that... so   considering what we know about these cultures  and these cave, air quote "cave people",   that they live in the cave in the winter when  it's cold and horrible and then they come out in   the spring, it's very interesting  to make that comparison So, these bears could be talking about   the rebirth of spring could also be talking  about the rebirth of an individual but since it seems that the bear is associated with  the tribe as a whole, it probably is more of a   whole tribe type thing. The other interesting  thing of course is that both of these goddesses   are very strongly associated with women and  caves in a lot of cultures become associated with   females as well, so it might all very neatly uh,  sort of tied together to be this thing of rebirth,   maybe not just of the seasons but  also in some way for the tribe Incidentally, just in case  anybody was interested I've,   well you won't know, I've added  it for you it'll always be here   but this word Arktoi is actually the name of those  um little bears of Artemis... they're called the   the uh the young priestesses who will actually  dress up in in bear pelts for the ceremony uh,   the ritual for Artemis and I just... it's so  close to um the word Artio there for the goddess So remember those three, three little lines there They show up in a lot of places as part of  a larger group of non-objective symbols. Now   I'm going... gonna be 100 honest with you  now: we literally have no idea what this is No one's been able to figure it out just yet um...   it's a little bit hard to see so I'm gonna  draw this in for you... these are horse heads so we have what appear to be two groups:   we have two yellow horse head group and one  red horse head group. Photographs tend to   flatten things out so you're not seeing it as it  would be, so for example this makes it look like   they're curved ...they're not they're they're if  you look at it in person they're pretty flat and   you can't see it here but there are three lines.  So each of these groups have the three lines   .Two yellow horse head has like three  circles that are all relatively the same size   one red horse head has one big  one and then four little ones Literally have no idea what this  means nobody's figured it out yet but the point that it makes obviously the horse heads are abstract symbols   but the circles and the lines... because you  can tell they're horses... um are non-objective   they're clearly set up to be two distinctly  different groups but what they mean beyond that is   really anybody's guess it's... it's very cool  and I show it to you as an example of how complex the art and the thought process behind it actually  was. These guys are are much more um thoughtful   than we might give them credit for. Now  since those lines are on the bear as well,   it could be that they have something to do with  the idea of fertility or rebirth or strength I think that it has to do with the idea of  some sort of healing or some sort of rebirth   and I'll tell you for why Because of this guy. This guy is Otzi. Now good  old Otzi the iceman is um from from significantly   later on he's from the copper age but, and he's  he's from Italy uh he was found in in the Otzel uh region which is uh i believe sort of in between  Italy and Austria so it was found in the Otzel   uh Alps in that region and that's why his name  is Otzi. So Otzi has a whole bunch of tattoos   on him... now this is one of those times  where if you want to see more of Otzi just   let me know maybe I'll even uh put um, a  little thing uh in the in the discussion tab uh, so you can tell me if you  want to see more about Otzi there but   um Otzi was found with a lot of  weapons a lot of very cool stuff and   he's very well preserved... he's basically  a freeze-dried mummy uh, he is certainly   one of the oldest natural mummies that have ever  been found... he's in relatively good condition   except right here um when they were digging him  up they were kind of, using a backhoe and they   they ripped off some of him... too bad for little  Otzi but among his tattoos what feature the most   prominent are these ones that are just lines and  there's a lot of them that are just three lines   so the other thing about these tattoos that he  has they're grouped around places where studies   have shown that he would have been in pain...  there's a bit of evidence of, in some cases,   healed fractures in some cases early, well not  really early because he was I believe he's in his 40s or 50s... I'll have to look that up um but  he's not a "youngin", he's not a spring chicken   that's for sure, but uh he had evidence of um...  shoot what is that called now... arthritis and   so these tattoos may have been helping that. I  had a student who actually... participated in um like uh a lot of uh alternative medicine type  stuff and she said that a lot of these regions are   where people would would give acupuncture for  certain things so maybe that even has something   to do with the placement of them, I don't  know but that's a pretty cool thought. So if   he has these in regions where he was in pain and  maybe wanted healing that could help bolster the   argument that those lines and their association  with the bear means it's something about healing   it's a possibility. The other uh  symbol I want you guys to notice   is this one right here: that's a  cross. Now we were talking earlier   about how non-objective symbols can mean different  things depending on the culture that you're in   um this is a great example of that. If  you are of a Judeo-Christian background,   you look at that and you say wow that's a cross  why does Otzi have a cross on him... The thing is   Judeo-Christians actually borrowed this symbol...  this symbol, or adopted it I should say. This   symbol is ancient, this symbol is prehistoric,  this stems... this symbol this cross symbol   is actually found in a lot of caves um, we  call it the "axis mundi" a oh my lord... a x i s m m-u-n-d-i and what that means  what the axis mundi is is the center   of the world the crossing of the worlds  okay so this line here this up and down   represents heaven up here and the realm  of the dead or the underworld down here   and then this line represents our  world, the realm of the living So the axis mundi represents the  fact that all of these realms   are connected they're all joined together  So, it becomes a symbol of connecting heaven  the underworld and the realm of the living and that connection means that you  can have life, death, and rebirth all right, so and I think I've said  this before but I'll say it again:   life, death, and rebirth, that's the original  triumvirate, it's the original trinity.   Life, death, and rebirth is going to be so  important to early cultures and it's going   to stay important which is why the number three  maintains its importance in a lot of different   cultures and I will just point out again that  those lines in the bear: there's three of them   and even on Otzi not all of his tattoos  but a lot of them are threes, as well as   this very wonderful axis mundi, this connection  between heaven the underworld and our world...   life, death, and rebirth. Now we will see  that again we'll see it an awful lot um Yeah... okay so i i hesitate to mention  this because it is such a loaded word but um the swastika originally it's not a  negative symbol originally it's a symbol of celestial good fortune, healing, luck all of  those things and it actually grows out of this   axis mundi as well. You take this symbol you  add little arms to it and that puts a spin   on it so it's spinning so that all of the the  points are overlapping and crossing each other   um most of them turn from east to west and it is  that idea that the sun rises in the east and sets   with the west... you're going with the sun um  the Buddhist one actually spins the other way   and, or the arms at least make it look  like it's spinning the other way, um   I'm not sure why that is  traditionally um I read one   suggestion that said uh the symbol, the  Buddhist took the symbol from uh Hinduism   and because they wanted it to look different  they they twist they turned it around... I don't   know if that's true or not I think that sounds  overly simplistic but the one thing I can tell   you is that one nazi [ __ ] ruined that symbol for  basically everybody else who ever used it in the   entire world and when I say anybody else who used  it in the entire world what i mean is uh Hindu,   Buddhist, Native American, Celtic, Greek... the  list goes on and on. If you are interested in that   and if that's something you'd want to see more of   let me know and I will show you some  images of that and we can talk about it   because it is a very interesting um phenomenon to  know that weirdly uh it was a very beloved symbol   before, as I said, the one nazi [ __ ] ruined  it for everybody else... and when I say it   was a beloved symbol, like you had good luck  coins in America that included the swastika as as a symbol of good luck right alongside  horseshoes and four-leaf clovers... it's   wild it's just wild how, you know, and in a sense  that's what we were talking about earlier as well:   context, right? If you're not in the culture  it means something or it can mean something   completely different you know axis mundi if  you see this and your Judeo-Christian: oh it's   a cross. If you're not: oh it's axis mundi. Same  thing with that symbol: if you're Hindu, oh that's   a symbol of of of blessing of good fortune of good  luck, if you're ancient greek oh that's protection   you know and just one nazi [ __ ] to ruin it  all for everyone ...it's weird man it's weird Excuse me it came out of nowhere! Usually  I try to pause... what can I say you guys   are really getting the live experience  today... so anyhow yeah let's move on   So, these are just some more pictures of Otzi's  tattoos and you can kind of see what I was talking   about, that many of them are the groups of three.  He has at least two of those axis mundi's and he   does have some groups of four or more or four plus  threes as well, so this is a little bit of a segue   but it's a good one because I  mentioned at some point, I think   when I was talking to you guys about different  things that I'm hoping you guys will get out   of this the ability to be able to look at  what's going on in the world around you,   in your world, in your life, in the things that  you like and enjoy, and be able to spot things   and say oh okay that that is a motif that  means this this is a continuation of this   idea and so on and so forth well I've got one  of those for you here and the axis mundi is   a symbol that just shows up again and again and  again in the ancient world but it also shows up a   lot in the modern world. This is actually from  a video game that came out I believe in 2019   although thanks to what I think we all  refer to as the lost years of Covid   I'll have to look that up in check but I'm  pretty sure it came out right before it,   anyway the video game was called Death Stranding  and I'm not going to do any spoilers just in case   there's anybody out there who hasn't played it  yet and might want to play it, I think it was   an absolutely amazing game not only for  content but just for a lot of the themes   that sort of appeared throughout it many of them  are themes that we've already started to see   in the paleolithic mindset. So the most obvious  one here, this is on a character in the game   that has a lot to do with the idea of death  and rebirth and what's the symbol that's   front and center on this character? Well  it's an axis mundi right? We have heaven   the underworld of the world of the dead and then   our plane of existence right so again it's that  axis mundi symbol that life, death, and rebirth   symbol being used in a context where it's  meaning, well, you would expect it to be but to see it in in a modern  context, in a video game,   that's just really really cool and it just  emphasizes what I keep saying that you're not   going to remake these symbols, these symbols  exist and we're going to keep returning to them.   It's almost a primordial motif somewhere deep  inside of our brains that we keep coming back to   you'll also notice he has a lot of handprints on  him that again has something to do in the game   with this idea of illustrating a presence an  existence which I think is something you also see   in those handprints in the paleolithic art and  we also have another sort of example of that in   our modern world where you you have stars do their  handprints in cement right? It's kind of a way to   show that they were there, they exist there's this  permanence about them: they've earned this right   to sort of tell the world forever  that they existed that they're there   and then you have people come by and put their  hands in the star handprints and be like ah   my hand fits whoever's hand right and that  kind of makes a connection so all of these   motifs they start so early on in our history but  they're such a part of what makes us human in this   shared experience called life that we still  see them and we still use them and I love that So going back now to the cave in Chauvet,   just to remind you of where we  were with those positive handprints we have negative handprints as well   and far from looking very organized far  from looking like a very specific animal   here we have these negative handprints that are  literally all over the place they're also farther   back in the cave which implies that it has a  different meaning and a different function.   The other thing that researchers have  noted about these hands they're not   all the same hands... so you see here we have more  left hands than right hands... now why is that   well think about how these images are made. I've  said they're negative hand prints so basically   they're using the hand as a stencil, they put  the hand up on the wall and they chew some kind   of pigment in their mouth and they spit it  out through a hollow reed or a hollow bone,   basically one of the earliest air guns in  existence, and then they take their hand   away and it makes a really cool impression on the  wall. Now as you can see this wall has been used   for this purpose over and over and over and over  again for possibly generations they're not, oh   and why they're mostly left-handed? Well, because  you're gonna hold the straw in your dominant hand   right so that's why they're mostly left hands.  You do have a couple of righties which proves that   even way way back in the day... let me pick  another color that will show up... even way   way back in the day you do have uh some people  who are left-hand dominant rather than right hand   dominant. You also apparently have female  hands as well as male hands uh all different   ages because of all different sizes there's even  baby hands there's even baby hands on this wall!   I don't have a picture of it... I'm sorry but  there are some baby hands on this wall as well   so it is very clearly something different... it's  farther back in the cave it's harder to get to   the belief is that it has it might have had  something to do with a kind of healing ritual um   that you would take the person back there and  you would put the hand up on the cave wall   again with this idea that the cave was a  manifestation of some sort of female energy   or bear energy bear for protection,  bear for healing that kind of thing   and for the minute that your hand is up there  with the pigment being blown around it you and the   wall are the same color so you and the wall of the  cave are one and then when you take your hand away   it must have looked like something almost  magical that as your hand gets pulled away   your hand remains on the wall but also the  bit of the cave that was painted over the   same color comes with you on your hand so it  would be very easy to kind of imagine this   being a healing ritual. Is that what it is? Who  knows? But it is very cool to speculate on it,   and you can see how different it looks  some people have said this said to me   that this looks hellish and it unsettles  them... I hope it doesn't unsettle you Now speaking of things that look very different we  come to a room that has two very different styles   in it, this is the firsy, side note: so it's  a small room. it's so small you could probably   reach your arms like spread your arms out and  touch one side with one arm and with one hand   and the other side with the other hand that's how  small it is but the images in this room are very   very different. So on one side we have  animals that look like this and they're very they're very almost ethereal looking   they don't look solid and part of what's  giving them that feel is the way that they were created we're gonna focus up on the horsey because he's  my favorite but also because he's the clearest   of the images. Now where as the other images  we've seen so far, the bear and most of the   other images that we're going to see in caves in  general, are made by applying paint to the wall,   these guys are made differently, they're actually  made by scratching into the wall. There's a very   soft kind of sediment that's on the cave wall  and they can literally just using their fingers   and maybe a stick if they feel like using  a stick ,can just kind of scrape off that   top layer and that's how these were made. So  right off the bat they have a different feel   just because of the way that they look  but if you look at this horse, now again   which one of our style words is this: is this  naturalistic, abstract, or non-objective?   If you're having a problem, let's  compare it to the other side of the cave,   of a... of the room of the cave,  remember you just spread your arm   across you touch one hand to this  guy and your other hand would be touching these guys. Now look at these horses   and compare these horses to the  horse we were just looking at I think you can see what I'm getting at... these  guys look so very naturalistic. They're just a   whole bunch of different horses um, it looks like  they're even eating... I love this guy, he's my   favorite. Look at him! His little horsey mouth is  open and he's he's got a little horsey chin and   his little horsey nose and their little manes I  mean they are they're so so beautifully rendered   very naturalistically now here's where I got to  tell you some bad news... remember how I told   you that they don't eat the bears? They eat  the horses. Paleolithic man eats horses um,   if you are a fan of horses I'm very sorry to  have to tell you that, but on the plus side um   they draw really nice pictures of horses and  that probably has to do with some kind of   spiritualization of the horse. Now why do I say  that? Well even though this is a naturalistic   depiction so it's clearly talking more  about horse and the horsiness of horse,   it's still in a place that's kind of farther  back in the cave it's a dark cave room so   just because it's naturalistic doesn't mean  that it doesn't have an important meaning,   just like if you think back to the first half of  class today just because something is utilitarian   doesn't mean that it's not important. In this  case it could very well be something like you   are making this image in celebration of the horse  that you will eat to appease the horse spirits   so that they will let you eat them or maybe  to bring more horses to allow you to hunt   and to eat them that's not too far-fetched, I  know in a few Native American cultures, especially   northwest coast, you have a practice where you'll  decorate your weapon, like a harpoon, beautifully   and the idea is that the whale that you're  hunting or maybe the seal that you're   hunting will look at it and kind of go: oh all  right, you spent a lot of time on that weapon   you obviously appreciate my life so  I'll let you kill me and and eat me um,   it might seem a little bit weird to us maybe  but um, it does it it kind of makes sense.   So these images, very naturalistic, clearly  talking about the physicality of a horse versus versus this guy. Now hopefully you can see,   when you compare it to how naturalistic those  other horses were, that this is clearly more   abstract. He doesn't have the same kind  of detail he doesn't have the same kind of you know emphasis on his mouth uh,  that might be an eye that they gave him   but it also could just as easily just be   you know some kind of a schmear or something  ...now it looks like he's wearing horsey glasses   neigh... but what really sets it apart uh as being  abstract there's something in there that doesn't   go with horse it's not helping the horsiness  of horse so to speak it's this line here that doesn't seem to go with  "horse" right? It's it's not it's not a physical descriptor of horse but if  you think about it and again I know I have a   lot of artists in this class, what does this  line kind of invoke, what kind of a feeling?   Especially if you take it uh, in turn with  these kind of lines that are underneath it does that kind of feel like motion? like movement? If you ever watch a slow-mo thing of a  horse's head especially the head kind of goes   up and down and up and down so to me it  feels very much like this is talking about   motion or something like that. Now the other  ones are so solid they're definitely talking   about "horse" be it the horse that they  eat or the horse that they want to eat   whereas this one is clearly talking about  movement or flow or something like that   and since they're in the very same room I think  that's such an interesting comparison that we   have solid horse naturalistic horse on one wall  and then we have the kind of spirit horse on the   other side of it, it's very much a dichotomy...  "dichotomy" means two different sides of the same   thing so for example, or not necessarily of  the same thing, but two opposites that you put   them together and they make a stronger sort of  meaning, so like death plus life equals rebirth   right? male and female are a dichotomy: they're  opposites, right, but when you put them together   you can get the idea of life or something like  that ying and yang is a dichotomy as well,   uh up and down that's a dichotomy, right?  So... light and dark... anyhow um it really is   it hints at a very interesting thought process  going on uh in these paleolithic cave artists   be it whether or not this is talking about  speed or spirit or what the juxtaposition   in this room definitely suggests that it  is something very interesting going on and this is an owl also from Chauvet... I'm  just... I'm showing it to you because it's   cute and also they don't eat owls so why  are they depicting an owl? Your guess is   as good as mine. Usually owls are symbols of  the night um, you know usually they are seen   as very wise messengers... birds in general  in the ancient world are seen as being very   sort of special creatures because they can fly  and of course again think of the axis mundi,   right: heaven, underworld our plane of existence.  A bird can fly up right a bird is not bound to our   plane of existence right, um , ducks ducks  are like the ultimate of spiritual bird for   the ancient people because they fly up but they  can also dive under the surface of the water   and water is considered a symbol of  life but some cultures actually believe   that you get to the underworld by going  underwater um the Mayans have that belief Water is is very typically associated with that  so ducks are especially kind of this weird,   wonderful creature... remember this  because it's going to come back and now we're entering into a  Gravettian era cave: Cosquer Now as we move on to the uh second period, the  Gravettian period, we're going to visit our second   cave which is called Cosquer and we're still in  France, and Cosquer's earliest dates are about   2200 bce sorry 22 000 bce um I have a problem with  hundreds and thousands I don't know what it is   but I just I always mess it up so I'm gonna try  not to do that again but I will. Anyhow, these   are negative handprints but do you see something  different about them? You see anything different? The handprints are making symbols try to do that a little  better... they're making signs now what exactly do these signs mean? We don't know but what we do know is that there's an awful lot of them.  There's an anthropologist who went around uh   cataloging and probably still  cataloging all the ones that he found   and he tries to um recreate how they may have  made them and there's just so many of them and what it is seems to be a  genius way of communication.   They don't have written language but they have  hands so they can effectively throw up a hand   sign do a negative handprint of it and use that as  a way of communicating with others... it's genius   it's genuinely genius and beautiful. Now what  exactly do they mean, again, we don't know.   One researcher suggested that  they are based in animal kingdom   stuff so I don't really see it... this one kind  of looks like a bird maybe this one kind of looks   like a bear paw maybe but, other than that  I don't really see it but it's cool and and   you can see how that would work because if you  walk up to somebody and flash the peace sign   well they'll probably flash the peace sign back  if you walk up to somebody and and flash them   an i love you sign well you'd probably make them  smile and make their day if you walk up to someone   and flip them the bird chances are you'll have a  very different reaction. So hand gestures are very   very effective, they're a very effective way of  communication and it seems as though not only   did the paleolithic people know that but they  also figured out a way to I guess you could say utilize it as a visual form of  communication for when they weren't   there, right? They really found  a way to kind of evolve it Now I've been showing you a whole bunch of  hand prints so I figured, let me show you some   footprints. Cosquer is remarkable in that the the  ground was so soft that you get these footprints   captured in the silt and since as I've mentioned,  when you go back into these caves the farther you   get into the chambers the more difficult it is  and it's not something that everyone was doing   so you don't have foot traffic over foot  traffic over foot traffic over foot traffic   so in in some cases the conditions are just  right and here we have one of those just   right conditions where the footprints of this  artist from thousands of years ago are captured,   perfectly preserved you can see it and  apparently they had big feet because that's   that that's a ruler. That's a foot ruler  so that's a foot long it's a foot long   it's a foot long! Oh i'm gonna see myself  out now... and I will see myself back in to   do another comparison with you... both of  these images are abstract. One of them is of   an ibex which is a kind of sort of goat  creature kind of thing maybe sort of deer-like   probably more deer-like than goat-like hey  it has antlers and hooves there you go,   and um that is in Cosquer, and then of course  down here you have a horsey from Chauvet. Now   both of these are done in that scrapey style, both  of them have some extra bit inside of them but   they're depicted in two completely different  ways so whereas we said this abstraction seemed   to be talking about movement or speed or something  like that this one with the ibex clearly isn't um I'm not sure what they're talking about  there, maybe they're trying to talk about   where to hit the ibex maybe  it's some kind of of um uh coloring thing I don't know um,   there's many things we don't know but it  definitely the cross hatching is definitely   a different feel than a line like that so whatever  that abstraction is, it's clearly very different.   And one last painting from Cosquer,  it hasn't held up that fantastically,   again caves are wet places anyway uh doubly so for  caves like Cosquer that is now mostly underwater,   but I just had to show these guys to you  they're great auk, they're basically a kind of   giant penguin I think there was  something like four or five feet tall   and uh I just love the idea of there being  giant penguins walking around France... so   yeah they are...I think they're very cute.  Okay so now we're going to go to Lascaux,   France uh for the our Magdalenian period cave  which is our last period in the paleolithic era   and we're 20 000 to 15 000 bce and it says  bc there; bc and bce are essentially the same   thing it's just different ways of saying it. BC is  "before Christ", BCE is "before the common era",   so you can see why people might gravitate towards  bce and then on the other side of, air quotes,   "zero" ,there is not really a zero there's not  really a year zero, so, but on the opposite side   of bce we have the dates AD or CE. CE is "common  era", AD is uh "anno Domini" which means "in the   year of our lord" so again you can see why we're  gravitating more towards uh ce or bce but um,   lots of books still do bc and so do I when I just  type because I'm tired... one other thing I need   to apologize for very quickly guys, if you're  hearing a lot of rough cuts or if I'm repeating   some stuff I'm very sorry but again I don't have  my new computer yet so I've been trying to do all   of this on my tablet and it hasn't been terribly  reliable so I'm having it cut out a lot I'm   having it go to sleep when I don't want it to I'm  having it erase slides on me that I know that I   saved so when I go back to check on things they're  just not there and I have to re-record them and um   I'm running out of time to do that now because  I want to make sure that your test is up and   everything is up for you the way it should be so  I'm not gonna listen to myself five thousand times um three times is about my limit and I just  I repeat myself sometimes as a result of that   and sometimes you hear like a weird sort of um  like a fuzz out noise I don't know what that is   I'm sorry the snoring is my cat  but she's she is now uh snoring   over there in her bed so I don't think you'll  hear her, anywhere, anyhow uh Lascaux. These   two guys are from the Hall of the Bulls and  we will talk about them in just a tickety-boo   the first thing I want to do is just talk to you  a little bit about Lascaux itself now, Lascaux   was one of the most famous caves probably in the  whole world. It's known for its variety and its   quality of images as well as having some that  are unique in the whole world. More on that   in just a little bit, one of the things about  Lascaux is it's not open to the public anymore.   Very early on after it was opened to the public  um I think in the 60s they already found that   the amount of people coming in and  looking at it was causing too much chaos and too much um I guess you could say uh damage to the place uh  yes, caves are already very warm very humid places   but when you add to that a whole bunch of people  uh breathing and carrying you know stuff in on   them and bacteria in on them it just was very  poor conditions for trying to maintain this   treasure for human culture and so  they originally just tried to add more   ventilation that didn't work they tried to limit  the amount of people coming in that didn't work   um they thought about adding ventilation systems  instead of just improving things like artificial   ventilation system uh they couldn't do that  obviously so what they ended up doing was just   closing Lascaux and you really can't get into  it now unless you're one of the party of people   that occasionally go in, scientists to study how  everything is faring in there to study how things   are going on uh, occasionally also like you know  anthropologists or people who can prove that they   really need to get in there uh can get in there...   but don't despair because uh very close  next door there's the Lascaux museum   which I believe is called Lascaux  Four uh the site is part museum part reproduction really they 3d  scanned a good portion of Lascaux   put it, reassembled it as an attraction. They keep it warm and humid so the  experience of walking in the cave   will be very similar to what you would  have they keep it relatively dark although,   there are lights there so that you can see  everything much more clearly than if you   were even in the original cave, and the floor  is leveled off so you don't need to worry about   what you can't walk on, and what I mean by that is  if you look at this diagram of the actual Lascaux   what you'll see is that there's a good  portion of it that you can't actually   walk on so like for example this is the  is the large entryway uh where originally   you would have and when I say originally I  mean way back in the day in the paleolithic era   that's where the bulk of the  people the tribe would live   and they would, during the inclement months, they  would go in there each family group would have its   own little tent set up and then in the middle you  would have a communal fire or something like that   and then the farther back the more difficult  it gets ,as we've said ,but you can see that   now you can't walk on any of this that's a  wall. This is just very rough sort of terrain   and basically the only part that they can  walk on would have been this right here   and then you can see how narrow it gets in places  and as we mentioned the farther back you go   the more difficult it is to get there so  going this way it gets more difficult this way less difficult than this way but more  difficult than than than this here   and then this here this is  very very difficult terrain,   the floor actually kind of drops out and you get  into this shaft situation where um it it literally   drops down into this place that's like six meters  lower than everything else and six meters is about   18 feet so it's it's really  nothing to sneeze at at all So now these bulls are perhaps one of the  most beautiful, I mean Lascaux is nicknamed   um the Sistine chapel of the ancient  paleolithic world with good reason, I think um   it's they're not all this beautiful I have to  tell you some of them are kind of funny looking   but this is a gorgeous example of paleolithic  cave painting. What we have here are two bulls and they're painted with tremendous detail,   these guys are super naturalistic they're so  naturalistic that we can see they're little boy   bulls or bison, we can see they have little hooves  we can see they have eyes and little noses little   nostrils and little mouths we're looking at  them from the side so they only have one horn You can also see that the artist who made these  use two different techniques so for this part it's   pretty smooth but then for the part that's fuzzy  it actually looks fuzzy it's really something. Now some people like to say that they're, they've even  attempted to show perspective... in other words,   this bull looks closer to us than this bull  because this guy is bigger and has more detail   whereas this one has less detail and is smaller  and it even looks like here they've overlapped   and put left a little bit of like a blurring  in between to really emphasize that this guy   is in front... the problem with that is there's  too much damage that's been done to the cave   and there's too many variables so you can't  say that they meant for this guy to have so   little detail you just can't, but what you can  say is that it's a beautiful example of bulls.   Hey guys! just me, from the future! I just wanted  to pop in because I noticed that for some reason   that last picture of the bulls, for some reason  when I uploaded it the first time, it kind of   it lost a whole bunch of pixels and I don't know  why so I'm putting this more high res picture in   and I'm not going to draw on it or anything and  I'm just going to hope that it stays looking as   nice as it does okay that's it let's go  back to your regularly scheduled class   now... I just want to go back to the map for  a second to emphasize that where we just were   is right here in the Hall of the Bulls, all  right, it's not the hardest place to get to   right? uh It's kind of literally the  first one after the the living quarters   which is probably why it looks so naturalistic.  What we're going to do now is go down and over   to here, all right, so that's where we're going Now this is all in Lascaux 4, so this is all  in the recreation of Lascaux, but a couple   of things I want you to notice, and just let  me reassure you that they did everything as   realistically as they possibly could, so yes, the  size of those bulls on the wall are the size that   they are in the original Lascaux, the only thing  not original as I mentioned the floors are level   and there was no lights in the original  Lascaux obviously. The original Lascaux   is very dark and when you imagine these  artists having to go back into these spaces,   look at this tiny little opening there,  if you imagine them having to go back into   these spaces with just one little sad oil lamp  again it's very clear that these are important   and that the farther back you go the  more special they get. So, for example,   these bulls look less naturalistic probably  because they're starting to talk less about   real bull and starting to talk more  about some kind of spiritual aspect This is again Lascaux 4, this is the remake. It  doesn't have, the remake, it doesn't have the   lights in it yet but I like it because it shows  you that even with a flashlight even in modern   times it's very very dark and you can see again  how they're having to squeeze into those passages   which brings us to the shaft. Now  this is in the original Lascaux This door was added in as something to um basically when they had to when they have to  check on the cave to see how everything is but   also to allow gases that build up to have a place  to go, like co2 for some reason the cave has a big   problem with co2 um and it allows it to to kind  of have a place to escape, in fact one of these   things is a pipe I think it's this and it runs  down all the way down into what what you can't see   uh the bottom of this place uh down on the bottom  here now this is the lowest point in the cave so To the bottom of this shaft is six meters down,   there's six meters between  the top here and the bottom The images that are on the  bottom of this shaft are among well, you tell me, I mean I  know you can't tell me but   think about it think of how hard  this was for them to get to okay Think of how difficult it would have been  for them to get not only back into the cave   but down into the space and then obviously leave  again and you tell me, do you think whatever's   there is going to be naturalistic like the  bulls in the front or do you think they're   going to be more abstract because they're  talking about something more spiritual and when you have your guess hit the next slide this is what's there yeah if you said more abstract get yourself  another cookie because you are absolutely   correct um and in the weirdest and most  wonderful way possible now this particular image   has a lot of different names to it and I don't  really like any of them. It's most popularly   called the "Shaft of the Dead Man" but I don't  like calling it that because there's no way to   tell this guy is dead. If anything the only thing  that's 100 percent dead or at least 100 dying   is this guy, this is a bull who clearly has a  spear chonking through him and what are probably   his intestines falling out. This is almost  certainly a spear because they've left the spear   thrower on it just so that you know that it is a  spear, but this guy this figure right here, oh the   other thing they call it is uh the "bird-headed  man", i don't like that one either. Now why don't I like Shaft of the Dead Man? Well  for a couple of reasons: as I already said,   there's... we don't have any evidence that this  guy is dead uh there's no ground line and without   the ground line you can't tell what he's doing:  is he, is he falling backwards, is he getting up,   what's, what's he doing? We don't know. Second  thing I don't think we can call this guy a man,   I just don't because this head here is  clearly not a human head if anything   it's like the bird so he does have a bird head but only four fingers now if they were trying to show that this  was definitely a human I think they could   have thrown on an extra finger don't you and  giving them five little digits, but they didn't   so between the head and the fingers I don't  think we can convincingly say that this   is a regular human, let alone where it is  in the cave let alone the fact that this   is the only full body humanoid image that  has ever been found painted in a cave. Now,   you do have full bodied sculptures most  of them are of women but you do have them   and you do have sculptures and paintings  of well, parts of men and women largely the sexual organs   but images of full-bodied people  painted on caves, no this is it. so This is an amazingly important image now, the one  thing we can say with difinity is that clearly this figure is meant to be masculine. Why do  I say that, well I'm gonna give you a new word   and it's a nice word, it's a good word "Ithyphallic" and please hold while  I look up the spelling of that...   yes amazingly I spelt it right on the first  try... I'm as surprised as anybody else. Anyhow   our bird-headed man is what we call an  ithyphallic figure, that is a fancy way to say   has an erect penis. We use the term so that we  don't have to say "erect penis" in a room full of,   classroom full of people that may or may  not get the giggles as a result of it   um but that's what it means so we're looking  at an ithyphallic bird-headed figure that's   the other reason I don't like calling it Shaft of  the Dead Man because that doesn't really go with   "dead". Now I know what you might be thinking, and  you might be thinking that well what about rigor   mortis? Rigor mortis doesn't  affect that particular organ um yeah so just uh just throwing it out there um anyway, the other so the other thing we know about   this culture is there's a lot of emphasis  on the idea of life, death, and rebirth. Now   they could have chosen any head for this  particular figure, by the way the fact that   we have a bird head on a humanoid body  at all that's called "anthropomorphic"   okay? Anthropomorphic is a kind of abstraction  where you combine human with non-human okay so,   the brave little toaster, Thomas the tank  engine, those guys are anthropomorphic too...   Mickey Mouse, Goofy: anthropomorphic.  Okay bird-headed guy anthropomorphic Generally speaking again as we said with our other  abstractions whatever you abstract it with has a   purpose so they could have abstracted anything  they wanted here they could have given it a bull   head but they didn't, they gave it a bird head  and they doubled down on it with this bird image   right here. There's no reason for that bird to be  there other than to let us know definitely a bird Now the other thing about the bird image is the  bird is on a stick. Now the bird could literally   be on a stick or the bird could be at the top  of this to emphasize the idea of verticality.   Now think of it for a minute okay:  this is at the bottom of a shaft that's vertical so you're emphasizing verticality  as a way of going up think of our axis mundi right heavens underworld our plane: life, death, rebirth birds do what? birds fly birds are constantly going back  and forth between our world and the above that's why angels have wings right so interestingly everything is pointing  to this idea of life, death, and rebirth.   I'll do you one more This bull is clearly either dead or dying   if ithyphallic representations traditionally  have to deal with fertility or life/death plus life equals rebirth right and that cycle so I think what we're looking at here again also taking into consideration  that this particular depiction   is in the lowest point of the entire  cave and well back so it's dark   it's very wet it's very humid it's  very warm it's very down right   I think it's really a metaphor for the idea of  connecting death with life and therefore rebirth if that's not enough let me just toss a  couple more things at you this lamp was found at the  bottom of the shaft more or less   underneath that depiction. Now that's not the  only painting in there let me make that clear but it is I think the most evocative one,  there the other ones are animals which again   still important but that's not  what we're talking about right. Now   this lamp is very different from  other lamps that have been found other lamps look like this okay this lamp is relatively  cruedly made, it's very rough but it's functional right it's definitely functional   if we compare the lamp that was  found at the bottom of that shaft   to this lamp that was found in  a much more accessible location   it becomes obvious that there is a  difference in quality as well as construction One uses a very sort of uh rough stone  the other one has been purposely hewned   to be very smooth. It's a red color,  very different from the other one okay so what are we talking here,   this one also has extra markings on it. Do those  markings help the lamp be a better lamp? No right. You could argue the handle helps  a little bit but probably not because   it's going to slosh around anyway, but those  markings they don't help it be a better lamp so what are we looking at here? We're looking  at a ritualistic lamp versus a utilitarian one here's the kicker: so dark so deep so difficult to get to this lamp must have taken a while   to get so pretty and they just leave it there. I  sure hope he had another lamp to walk back with   otherwise he wasn't gonna have a fun time but  maybe that was part of the ritual who knows So all of this leads to the belief that  the Shaft of the Dead Man, as it's called,   as I hate to call it um, is a was a very special,  very religiously, we can't really use the word   "religious" yet because we don't, you know, that  implies a sort of organized thing that we don't   necessarily have but a very symbolically  important piece of work very ritual heavy now if you remember back to Chauvet where we  had those dots, we're still finding weird dots   so they're not set up in the exact  formation as either of those dots   but they are in a very particular group that  does reappear quite a few times in Lascaux   so they must have a specific meaning  but what that meaning is, we don't know,   because it's non-objective and we're not  in on the lingo. Same thing with these I... checker boards? I  don't know what to call them Checkerboards is one of the way that they are  referred to because you really can't... they   they are just weird little tic-tac-toe boards  with different colors in the different squares some people suggest that it's some kind of almost  map like a territory thing but I don't know that   there's enough real evidence for that so I  don't know that we'll ever quite figure out   what they are um interesting  they they are interesting you start getting very advanced weapons  during this time period and very fancy weapons   so they're not only uh just   you know sort of scarier looking with barbs  and whatever but they're also very decorative so here's an example of a kind of a baton type  thing probably not a weapon probably more for   some sort of ritual type thing. Now just so you  know this is what it actually looks like this   is what we call a roll out and a roll out is a  special means of... if you have like a cylindrical   or round kind of artifact or object you can take  a picture of it that is basically a panoramic and   it will open it up so that you can see the  whole thing at once and what you're seeing   here is a very I think kind of cute, naturalistic  scene of these deer that are looking back over   their shoulder at something and if you look there  they're swimming, they're very clearly swimming,   you see their little hooves just so very elegantly  no weight on them because they're swimming   and look at the fish look at those fish I mean I  I don't... those are really well rendered fish um super impressive so very naturalistic   and yet with all this naturalistic  stuff you also get some weird   non-objective symbols. Now we refer to those as  "lozenges" because they're kind of lozenge shaped again there's a lot of  supposition to what they might be it has been speculated that the  deer is actually looking up at them I don't know about it, it's possible they  kind of look like eyes and since they are   in the uh sky portion of this work uh it has  been speculated that they may represent stars many ancient civilizations think of stars as being  the eyes of the deceased or the eyes of gods so   it's possible but it also could just be a symbol   um of something else that we  have no idea what but it could be here's a close-up of those lozenges in the  sky and you can really see those those fishy really good fishy this is part of a spear thrower and again you  can just see how naturalistic these depictions   are. I mean they're really very very impressive.  It has been noted that the eye of this guy   kind of has that same Lozenge shape which  does give credence to the theory that those   lozenges in the last one are supposed to  be eyes, so stars or something like that Now I wanted to show you a cave  that was not just in France,   so here we have Altamira which is in  Spain and it dates to about 12 000 bce and um it's it's a beaut so the Magdalenian  period we're still in and it is just an   absolutely beautiful cave so this is the  inside of Altamira and what you can see   is that the ceiling has all of  these little dips and divots in it,   and paleolithic man when they were staying in  this cave thought that these shapes closely   resembled body shapes of bison and so they used  these bulges to create a sort of three-dimensional   image of a whole bunch of of bison; some of them  are standing up and some of them are laying down   and now we're going to take a look  at some sculptural figures remember   most of the the sculpture from the paleolithic  period is going to kick off or start in the   Gravettian period but that doesn't mean you get  absolutely nothing in the period before that In fact this example is from the period before  the Gravettian this is from the Aurignacian period   and it's called Lowenmensch. Now,  "Lowenmensch" means a lion person, basically   although it's sometimes translated as lion  man, lion person would be more accurate because no one, the the gender of this  particular uh figure is very much   up for debate. Now, uh we had this word  before um but again this is another example   of anthropomorphism right the combination  of animal and human in this case lion   and person so it's very different than  bird and person birds fly they talk to god   lions well they prowl they eat and they protect  and they probably scare so whatever Lowenmensch   is it's probably for protection or something like  that now why do I say that the gender of this   anthropomorphic figure is up for debate?  Well because it is um this was made of ivory   uh mastodon ivory, ancient elephant  ivory, and it was found in pieces   so it was put together as best as they could  but that doesn't mean that it's perfect.   So many people who say well it's got  to be a guy because that looks like   it originally had a penis that broke  off well you can't say that because um   you know they don't know if there was  anything extra there to begin with,   and then you have people say well it has to be a  female lion because it doesn't have a mane well   mountain lions, the mountain lions  that lived in Germany at this time   they didn't have manes either if they were  male; male or female didn't matter they didn't   have manes, as some lions don't, so you can't  tell from that um so it's always important to   study something before making a snap judgment One of the most famous and important  figures that show up are fertility figures   again because fertility is such an important  concept not just because of life, death,   and rebirth but also because well if you're  not having babies then your people die out   so I'm sure that's another reason. This here  is the Venus of Willendorf, it is from the   Gravettian period so, the second one when you  start getting a lot of little figures and things.   She was found in Austria and what do you  think are we looking at: naturalistic,   abstract, or non-objective? Again we know right  off the bat it can't be non-objective and it's   not naturalistic either. Why, well number one look  at the proportions I mean she barely has any feet,   number two her arms are like little  spaghetti noodles over her giant bosom   and number three has no face None at all so she's an abstraction and what do  you think is the concept that she's abstracting?   Well remember for abstractions you  exaggerate what you need to exaggerate   and take away which you don't need to have  right? So if you look at what's exaggerated here   the giant breasts the huge belly the very  large belly button the pubic triangle   all things that are necessary for birth and taking  care of one's young so she's a fertility figure. Why doesn't she have a face The same reason she doesn't  really have arms or feet:   it's not important to fertility but also  because the second you put a face on her   she is an individual and that's not what you want  you don't want an individualized fertility figure   you want one that's for everybody which is indeed  probably why she's wearing the hat even though   she doesn't have a face that hat or perhaps hair  style is very indicative of this part of the world   and you see it in a lot of the artwork  so it probably is a symbol of that tribe.   As you can see here, this is an example of another  fertility figure this one being carved into a wall   still has the hat. Now if you're wondering why  belly button is a symbol of fertility, well   anyone who's ever been born has a belly button  right because the umbilicus the umbilical cord   is attached to your mother and to your your  placenta that way, it's what kept you alive.   I don't think I don't know how much of it they  knew but they did know that it played some   part in "baby" and so an exaggerated belly button  would fit very nicely with the theme of fertility And this is her from the back just because  you don't usually get to see her from the back   so there you go... do she have the  booty? I will leave that up to you.   She's not very large she's actually pretty small  she's just about four and a half inches high and   that makes sense because you're hunter gatherers  you're wandering around you would want something   that's not very big and that you could kind  of just put in your hand and walk around with And this here is another fertility figure, again  no face but large breasts, large belly button,   large belly she is from the Czech  Republic, still from the Gravettian period,   she's known as the Venus of Dolni  Vestonice and she is super important   because she is the earliest figure in the  entire world made of ceramic. She's fired clay   she's a ceramic figure. It's amazing that they  did this 29 000 bce, it's amazing. The other   really cool thing about her she's got some  holes in her head that were apparently used   to put some feathers in so she had feathers on  her head again birds flying up to the heavens:   life, death, rebirth maybe? possibly? right?  Fertility figure flying up; it's very possible But what I really love if you look super super  super carefully there's a little uh fingerprint   it's a little kid's fingerprint  so maybe somebody gave this   you know while they were making  it they gave it to a kid to hold   before they put it in the fire it's just  it's such an amazing piece of our history And that's her from the back side because I can Now finally I just wanted to show you this  example. She's from France, she is another Venus She is made of ivory and she is the only  example that I know of that's carved with   even remotely a face she does still  seem to have very particular hair;   some people have said that it's braids some  people have said it some kind of a headdress   whatever it is it's very particular to her. I  think it definitely does kind of look like braids,   but you know who knows could could be could be  a combination could be anything um it could be   curls who knows all we know is that uh I I wish we  knew what the rest of her looked like... we don't   but I thought I'd show you a Venus  that actually has a face because   even the ones that have faces don't really  have faces there's eyes and a nose and that's   it so it's still keeping a good amount of  uh anonymity in it um but this is a very   interesting venus... it's the pity that the  rest of it's broken off and we don't have it   okay that's going to do it for this lecture! Next  time it will be the Neolithic. I hope everybody's   having a good week, I hope everybody's doing good  and I will talk to you all again real soon. Bye!