🚗

Small SUV Comparison Overview

Jul 26, 2024

Small SUV Mega Comparison Lecture Notes

Introduction to the Segment

  • Subaru introduced the Crosstrek as a compact SUV option resembling an elevated Impreza hatchback.
  • Compact SUVs have grown in size (e.g., Forester, Honda CR-V, Toyota RAV4), leading to a market demand for smaller alternatives.
  • The Crosstrek's success inspired other brands to enter the small SUV segment.

Comparison Overview

  • 11 competitors evaluated; notable absentees: Jeep Compass and the future Nissan Kicks.
  • Evaluation scores determine the best small SUV among competitors.

WeatherTech Protection Products

  • WeatherTech offers custom-fit products for vehicle protection, including:
    • Original WeatherTech Floorliner and Floorliner HP (flexible material).
    • Cargo liner to protect back space in vehicles.
    • Products come with a lifetime guarantee.

Competitor Evaluations

Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross

  • Fared poorly due to age and outdated features (6 years old).
  • Minor refresh in design, but interiors rated low on quality.
  • Lacks modern technology: no wireless charger, no wireless Apple CarPlay.
  • Competitive features: heated rear seats, dual sunroof, power driver seat.
  • Performance: 1.5 L turbo engine, but CVT feels elastic.
  • Safety rating: lowest from IHS; fuel efficiency is subpar.

Buick Encore GX

  • Positioned as a premium option amidst competitors (higher price).
  • Interior materials rated highly; however, styling is subjective.
  • Equipped with power features and technology like digital displays.
  • Not overly fuel-efficient; mid-pack cargo capacity.
  • Ride comfort is rated well, but handling is described as lacking.

Honda HR-V

  • Longest vehicle in the comparison; resembles older CR-V dimensions.
  • Engine rated lowest horsepower; poor fuel economy.
  • Pricey for sparse features; lacks basic amenities (e.g., power driver seat).
  • Spacious cabin but feels outclassed by better-engineered alternatives.

Chevrolet Trax

  • Economical; lower weight enhances performance.
  • Offers good handling but cramped rear legroom.
  • Interior quality is decent for the budget; may sacrifice features.

Chevrolet Trailblazer

  • No glaring weaknesses but lacks standout features.
  • Practical design with decent rear space; boxy shape for visibility.
  • Engine transmission performs well; relatively adept handling.

Hyundai Kona (New Generation)

  • Improved cargo space and features.
  • New technology includes better infotainment systems and a driver assist suite.
  • Offers robust turbo performance but suffers from lagging response times.

Mazda CX-30

  • Ranked closely with Crosstrek; scores well in handling but poorly in ride comfort.
  • Known for stylish interiors but limited rear seat space.
  • Competitive features include head-up display and power liftgate.

Volkswagen Taos

  • Performs well in most categories, earning the best backseat rating in the comparison.
  • Strong list of standard features, though it struggles with dual-clutch transmission in stop-and-go conditions.
  • Overall a strong, well-rounded vehicle but lacks standout elements.

Subaru Crosstrek

  • Third generation maintains its recognizable style.
  • The Wilderness model focuses on off-road capability with enhanced features (ground clearance, retuned suspension).
  • Rated lower in interior quality but excels in ride comfort.

Toyota Corolla Cross Hybrid

  • Improved significantly with hybrid technology; best fuel economy.
  • Interior lacks premium elements but includes essential features (power tailgate).
  • Competitive in power but limited rear seat comfort.

Winner of the Comparison

  • Kia Seltos emerges as the best overall choice due to balanced offerings:
    • Comfortable, stylish interior with competitive space.
    • High-end features despite being priced reasonably.
  • Notable mentions include the Corolla Cross Hybrid for fuel efficiency and Crosstrek for off-road capability.

Conclusion

  • The small SUV segment remains competitive with various brands attempting to meet consumer needs.
  • Each model has strengths and weaknesses, affecting overall preferences.

Notes for further study:

  • Compare drivability and features of hybrid models vs. traditional engines.
  • Investigate consumer preferences and trends in the small SUV market.