🛡️

Insurance Program Comparison

Jun 17, 2025

Summary

  • The discussion focused on the comparative benefits of Owner Controlled Insurance Programs (OCIP), Contractor Controlled Insurance Programs (CCIP), and traditional insurance models in construction.
  • Key topics included program design, cost implications, administrative requirements, and risk management features for each insurance type.
  • General advantages and challenges of each model were covered without specific action items or formal decisions taken.

Action Items

  • None.

Overview of OCIP vs CCIP vs Traditional Insurance

OCIP (Owner Controlled Insurance Program)

  • OCIP is purchased and managed by the project owner and covers all contractors and subcontractors on a project.
  • Provides consolidated coverage, potentially leading to lower overall insurance costs and fewer gaps or overlaps in coverage.
  • Streamlines claims handling and administration, offering more uniform risk management.
  • Challenges can include complex administration and required expertise from the owner’s side.

CCIP (Contractor Controlled Insurance Program)

  • CCIP is arranged and managed by the general contractor, covering subcontractors as part of a single project-specific policy.
  • Offers coverage and program control similar to OCIP, but places responsibility and administrative burden on the contractor.
  • Can enhance coordination and safety among project participants.
  • May be better suited to contractors with experience managing insurance programs.

Traditional Insurance Programs

  • In traditional models, each contractor and subcontractor procures their own insurance for the project.
  • Often results in fragmented coverage, possible gaps or overlaps, and more complex claims processes.
  • Administrative overhead can be higher due to managing multiple policies.
  • Can be simpler to implement for smaller projects but may not provide cost savings or consolidated risk management.

Comparative Cost and Risk Considerations

  • Wrap-up programs (OCIP/CCIP) are often chosen for large projects as they can lower total insurance costs and improve overall risk management.
  • Financial feasibility studies may be required to determine the best fit for project needs and budget.

Administrative and Compliance Aspects

  • OCIP and CCIP can reduce the need to track multiple certificates of insurance, but still require diligent compliance management.
  • Both wrap-up programs and traditional insurance require attention to coverage adequacy, deductibles, and claims protocols.

Decisions

  • None.

Open Questions / Follow-Ups

  • None.