⚖️

Understanding Murder and Voluntary Manslaughter

May 7, 2025

Lecture on Murder and Voluntary Manslaughter

Introduction

  • Covers murder and voluntary manslaughter
  • Builds on previous lessons: actus reus, causation, mens rea

Murder

Definition

  • Defined by Lord Coke, a 17th-century judge
  • Actus reus: unlawful killing of a reasonable creature in being
  • Mens rea: under the King's peace with malice aforethought, express or implied

Exam Tips

  • Use abbreviations like AR (actus reus), MR (mens rea) sparingly
  • Avoid unnecessary abbreviations
  • Important to understand definitions of terms

Causation

  • Murder is a result crime; causation must be proven
  • Factual and legal causation are essential
  • Thin skull rule: underlying conditions do not break causation

Situations Where Killing is Not Unlawful

  • Self-defense
  • During wartime by soldiers

Reasonable Creature in Being

  • Defined in Attorney General's Reference No. 3 of 1994
  • A fetus is not considered a reasonable creature until it has an independent existence
  • Brain-dead individuals are not considered reasonable creatures

Voluntary Manslaughter

Special Partial Defenses

  • Diminished responsibility
  • Loss of control
  • Result in a reduction of charge from murder to manslaughter

Diminished Responsibility

Legal Framework

  • Set out in Section 2 of the Homicide Act 1957, amended by Section 52 of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009
  • Four key elements:
    1. Abnormality of mental functioning
    2. Due to a recognized medical condition
    3. Substantially impairs the defendant's ability
    4. Provides an explanation for the killing

Key Cases

  • Byrne: abnormality of mental functioning
  • Golds: definition of substantial
  • Gittens: recognized medical condition (severe depression)
  • Alawalia: battered person syndrome

Intoxication

  • Generally irrelevant unless Alcohol Dependency Syndrome applies

Loss of Control

Legal Framework

  • Section 54 of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009
  • Three elements:
    1. Defendant lost control
    2. Qualifying trigger (fear of serious violence, things said/done)
    3. A normal person might have reacted similarly

Key Cases

  • Jewel: evidence of loss of control
  • Clinton: exclusion of sexual infidelity as a trigger
  • Dawes: exclusion if defendant incited violence

Exam Scenarios

  • Various hypothetical scenarios presented to apply knowledge of murder and voluntary manslaughter

Conclusion

  • The lecture prepares for exams on murder, voluntary manslaughter, and related defenses
  • Next topic: non-fatal offenses

Study Tips

  • Familiarize with key legal principles and cases
  • Understand statutory requirements and common law influences
  • Practice applying legal concepts to hypothetical scenarios