The Pune Porsche Crash Incident

Jun 23, 2024

Lecture Notes: The Pune Porsche Crash Incident

Overview

  • Date of Incident: May 18, 2014
  • Location: Pune, India
  • Victims: Ashwini Costa and Anish Aadia, both 24 and IT Engineers
  • Accused: 17-year-old Vedant (real name concealed), from a wealthy family
  • Incident: A high-speed crash involving a luxury Porsche driven by the accused, who was intoxicated and underage.

Details of the Incident

  • Timeline: May 18, 2014
    • 24-year-olds Ashwini Costa and Anish Aadia visit the Balor Club in Kalyani Nagar.
    • Around 10:40 PM, Vedant and 12 friends gather at Cozy Pub to celebrate 12th grade results.
    • Party continues at the Black Club until 2 AM.
    • Vedant, without a valid license, insists on driving the Porsche despite intoxication.
    • Around 2:30 AM, Vedant's speeding Porsche collides with Ashwini and Anish's motorcycle on Kalyani Nagar Airport Road.
    • Impact: Ashwini thrown 20 ft, Anish flung into a parked car. Both died instantly.
    • Porsche Speed: 160-200 kmph.

Immediate Aftermath

  • Police Response:
    • Bystanders pulled Vedant from the car.
    • Incident video goes viral.
    • Vedant taken to the Yerwada police station.
    • FIR filed based on Akib Mulla's complaint (friend of the deceased).
    • Local MLA Sunil Tingre’s involvement; vague reasons for police inaction.
    • Vedant provided comfort (burgers, pizzas) instead of being questioned rigorously.
    • Initial blood tests tampered to show no alcohol.

Family and Legal Influence

  • Wealth and Influence:
    • Vedant’s family owns Brahma Realty and Infrastructure.
    • Privileged lifestyle allowing undue leniency in handling the case.
    • Attempts to replace blood samples to avoid DUI charges.
    • Vedant’s father’s bribery attempts and intimidation of the driver to take the blame.
    • Multiple calls between Vedant’s father and hospital/authorities.
    • Laws amended but no stringent measures taken against privileged lawbreakers initially.

Consequences and Legal Actions

  • Charges:
    • Initially filed under death by negligence.
    • Upgraded to culpable homicide based on CCTV footage.
    • Accusations against Vedant’s father for tampering evidence.
  • Public Outcry:
    • Intense media and public scrutiny leading to retrial considerations.
    • Public protests, candlelight vigils, and social media outrage.
    • Essay competition by Congress youth wing in protest.

Systemic Corruption and Nepotism

  • Legal Findings:
    • Medical evidence tampered; fake blood samples used to shield Vedant.
    • Re-evaluation of evidence leading to confirmation of culpable homicide.
  • Judiciary Response: May 22
    • Juvenile Justice Board revokes bail and orders Vedant to observation home.
    • Vedant’s father faces multiple charges, including conspiracy and evidence destruction.
  • Police Actions:
    • Arrests of involved doctors and pub owners.
    • Closure of pubs serving alcohol to minors.
    • Demolition of illegal pubs following public outcry.

Broader Impact

  • Victims’ Background: Jabalpur, MP
    • Ashwini and Anish, promising careers in Pune.
    • Family members express deep grief and call for justice.
  • Public Sentiment:
    • Outrage at the lenient initial punishment (300-word essay).
    • Systemic issues highlighted: corruption, nepotism, and lack of strict enforcement for wealthy families.
  • Call for Justice:
    • Need for systemic changes and accountability in cases involving the affluent and influential.
    • Families’ demand for a Supreme Court-monitored investigation.

Conclusion

  • Key Takeaways:

    • The Pune crash case underscores the danger of letting minors drive and the privileges afforded to the wealthy.<br>
    • The need for judicial and systemic reforms to ensure equal justice for victims regardless of social status.
    • Continued public vigilance is necessary to hold authorities accountable.
  • Final Message:

    • Recognition of the profound grief faced by the victims' families.
    • Ensuring that justice prevails through continued advocacy and legal reforms.