Exploring Moral Dilemmas and Utilitarianism

Sep 10, 2024

Lecture Notes: Moral Dilemmas and Utilitarianism

Introduction

  • Previous discussion on moral dilemmas:
    • Trolley car problem
    • Doctors and organ transplantation
  • Key observations:
    • Initial judgments were based on specific cases.
    • Attempted to align personal judgments with broader moral principles.
    • Pressure to reconcile specific case judgments with general principles.

Moral Reasoning

  • Consequentialist Moral Reasoning:
    • Morality of an act linked to its outcomes.
    • Example: Acts bringing about good results despite harmful methods.
  • Categorical Moral Reasoning:
    • Intrinsic quality of the act matters, irrespective of outcomes.
    • Some acts deemed categorically wrong even if they yield good results.

Introduction to Utilitarianism

  • Focus on consequentialist moral theory, specifically Utilitarianism:
    • Philosophy by Jeremy Bentham in the 18th century.
    • Principle: Maximize utility (pleasure over pain, happiness over suffering).
    • Slogan: "The greatest good for the greatest number."

Case Study: The Queen vs. Dudley and Stevens

  • Real-life moral dilemma involving survival at sea:
    • Crew of the yacht Minionette stranded without food.
    • Decision to kill the cabin boy, Richard Parker, for survival.
    • Legal and moral implications questioned.

Jury Simulation

  • Moral permissibility of Dudley and Stevens' actions debated:
    • Arguments for their actions based on necessity and potential societal contributions.
    • Arguments against based on moral and legal principles.

Key Arguments Discussed

  • For Moral Justification:
    • Actions out of necessity for survival.
    • Greater good achieved by preserving lives of those with families.
  • Against Moral Justification:
    • Taking life without consent is inherently wrong.
    • Moral obligations not overridden by situational necessity.

Consent and Lottery Considerations

  • Consent:
    • Moral implications if Parker consented.
    • Debate on whether consent changes moral permissibility.
  • Lottery:
    • Fairness of using a lottery to decide who would die.
    • Consideration of whether consent to a lottery alters moral standing.

Philosophical Questions Raised

  1. Why is murder categorically wrong? Is it due to fundamental rights?
  2. Why does agreement to a procedure justify the outcomes?
  3. What moral role does consent play in altering the permissibility of actions?

Next Steps

  • Future readings on Bentham and John Stuart Mill to explore these philosophical questions.
  • Further interaction and learning opportunities online.

For additional resources and engagement: visit justiceharvard.org.