Chapter 2: From Trade to Territory - The Company Establishes Power
Key Historical Context
Aurangzeb: Last powerful Mughal ruler, controlled a large part of present-day India.
Post-1707: After his death, regional governors (subedars) and zamindars began to assert authority, leading to the emergence of regional kingdoms.
Political Shift: By the late 18th century, a new power was rising—the British.
East India Company's Formation
Year 1600: East India Company (EIC) chartered by Queen Elizabeth I.
Exclusive Trading Rights: EIC granted the sole right to trade with the East, preventing other English companies from competing.
Profit Strategy: Focused on acquiring goods cheaply and selling them at higher prices (mercantile trading).
Competition in Eastern Markets
European Presence:
Portuguese: Established bases in India, notably Goa (Vasco da Gama discovered route in 1498).
Dutch & French: Entered the Indian Ocean trade by early 17th century.
High Demand Goods:
Fine quality cotton and silk from India.
Spices like pepper, cloves, cardamom, cinnamon.
Price Wars: Competition among companies increased prices, reducing profits.
Elimination of Rivals: Companies sank ships and blockaded routes to secure trade dominance, leading to conflict with local rulers.
Establishing Trade in Bengal
First English Factory:
Established in Hukli in 1651.
Served as a base for traders (known as factors).
Development:
Factory included a warehouse and offices for company officials.
Expansion led to merchants settling nearby.
Fortification:
By 1696, a fort was built around the settlement.
In 1698, the company secured zamindari rights over three villages, including Calicutta (Calcutta/Kolkata).
Royal Edict (Farman):
Aurangzeb issued a Farman allowing duty-free trade for EIC.
Company officials engaged in private trade were expected to pay duties but refused, leading to significant loss of revenue for Bengal.
Conclusion
Impact of EIC's Actions:
The company's actions created tensions with local rulers, particularly with the Nawab of Bengal, Murshid Guli Khan, due to the EIC's manipulation of trade rights and refusal to pay duties.