Module 10: Article 1, The Guardian: The Human Pheromone myth
Apr 6, 2025
Sexing up the Human Pheromone Story: How a Corporation Started a Scientific Myth
Introduction
The belief in human sex pheromones, particularly androstadienone (a male molecule), is popular.
This belief is widely accepted due to numerous studies and books treating these pheromones as factual.
Tristram Wyatt, a zoologist, explains how this belief may not be as scientifically grounded as perceived.
The Genesis of the Pheromone Myth
1991 Paris Conference: Sponsored by EROX, a U.S. corporation with an interest in patenting androstadienone and estratetraenol (a female molecule).
Leading scientists unintentionally lent credibility to the conference.
A paper presented lacked essential details on the extraction and testing of these molecules.
EROX was the supplier of these putative pheromones.
The Role of Martha McClintock
In 2000, Martha McClintock, a notable scientist, endorsed these molecules, reporting effects on mood.
Her endorsement added respectability, leading to increased research and publications on human pheromones.
Issues with Research and Publications
Many subsequent studies may suffer from false positives, publication bias, and lack of replication.
An "echo chamber" effect may exist, where referees have no reason to question the shared premise of these molecules being pheromones.
A 2014 study hyped the influence of these molecules on gender assessment, furthering the myth.
Human Smells vs. Pheromones
Pheromones are species-wide signals, not individual odors.
Individual odors contribute to personal scent, aiding in recognizing family members or potential mates.
Events like pheromone parties mislabel individual scents as pheromones.
Do Humans Have Pheromones?
Possibly, but rigorous research is required similar to that used for other mammals.
As seen in goats, specific pheromones can be identified through meticulous narrowing down of potential molecules.
Future Directions: Mothers and Babies
Current research focuses on sex pheromones, but mother-baby pheromone communication may be a more promising area.
A study suggests nipple secretion may stimulate suckling in babies, indicating a possible species-wide pheromone.
Conclusion
More rigorous study is needed to conclusively identify human pheromones.
Future findings could change perceptions about pheromones, including in romantic contexts like Valentine's Day.
About the Author
Dr. Tristram Wyatt: Zoologist at Oxford University, author of "Pheromones and Animal Behavior." His work emphasizes returning to first principles in pheromone research.
Implications for Journalism
Highlights the importance of independent journalism in questioning established myths.
The Guardian, funded by readers, aims to remain unbiased and report truthfully without bowing to political pressures.
References
Wyatt, T.D. (2015). The search for human pheromones: the lost decades and the necessity of returning to first principles. Proc. R. Soc. B. DOI link