Procedural Fairness (Natural Justice) in Administrative Law

Jun 16, 2024

Administrative Law - Week 5: Procedural Fairness (Natural Justice)

Introduction

  • Focus on Natural Justice also known as Procedural Fairness.
  • Natural justice must be extended to anyone whose rights, interests, and legitimate expectations are affected by a decision.

Key Concepts of Procedural Fairness

  1. Hearing Rule: Affected person should be:
    • Shown the materials relied on by the decision-maker.
    • Given a reasonable opportunity to respond.
  2. Right to an Unbiased Decision Maker: Divided into two types:
    • Actual Bias
    • Apprehended Bias

Actual Bias

  • Definition: When a decision maker does not bring an impartial mind to the decision; they have predetermined the outcome.
  • Commonly due to discrimination (gender, race, etc.).
  • Example: The Crown v. Lee ex pate Shaw (150 years old English case).
    • Local sanitation committee member who judged a butcher he was prosecuting.

Apprehended Bias

  • Definition: No actual wrongdoing but a perceived conflict of interest that may bias the decision maker.
  • Originates from the idea: "Justice must not just be done, but must be seen to be done."
  • Case: Ebner v. Public Trustee
    • Objective Test: What a fair-minded lay observer might reasonably apprehend.
    • Threshold: Low; bias exists if the observer might reasonably apprehend bias.

Types of Apprehended Bias

  1. Personal/Family Relationship
    • Positive or negative relationships affecting decisions.
  2. Financial Conflict of Interest
    • Example: Kirby v. Centro Properties
      • Justice Finkelstein recused himself due to his superannuation fund owning shares in Centro Properties.

Situations Not Considered Bias

  1. Necessity
    • When no reasonable replacement decision maker is available.
    • Case: Laws v. Australian Broadcasting Tribunal and British American Tobacco v. Lorry
      • High Court discusses necessity; approved but rejected in the specific case.
  2. Expression of Opinion or Tentative Conclusion
    • Judges expressing tentative views to allow parties to address concerns is about fairness, not bias.

Conclusion

  • Natural Justice: Ensures rights to be heard and unbiased decision-making.
  • Importance: Fundamental to ensure fairness, prevent corruption, and empower individuals.
  • Exam Tip: Natural justice is a recurrent question in administrative law exams.

Next Week

  • Focus on narrow ultra vires grounds for review and jurisdictional error of law.