⚖️

Federalist 51: Checks and Balances Explained

Apr 23, 2025

Federalist 51 - Lecture Notes

Introduction

  • Date: February 8, 1788
  • Author: James Madison
  • Title: The Structure of the Government Must Furnish the Proper Checks and Balances Between the Different Departments.
  • Purpose: To explain how the Constitution’s structure provides checks and balances to protect against abuses by the national government.

Separation of Powers

  • Power divided among three branches:
    • Legislative (Congress)
    • Executive (President)
    • Judicial (Supreme Court)
  • Goal: To prevent any branch from becoming too powerful.

Checks and Balances

  • Each branch has power to check the others.
  • Human nature perceived as imperfect; political elites likely to pursue power.
  • Harnessing ambitions of each branch to check others is crucial.

Independence of Each Branch

  • Each department should have a will of its own.
  • Members should have minimal influence in appointing members of other branches.
  • Independence in terms of salary/emoluments is critical.

Protection Against Concentration of Power

  • Administrators of each department need constitutional means and personal motives to resist encroachments.
  • Ambition counteracts ambition: officials' interests tied to constitutional rights.

Core Reflection on Human Nature

  • Government is a reflection of human nature.
  • Necessity of government arises because men aren't angels.
  • Government must control the governed and itself.

Dependence on the People

  • Primary control on government.
  • Auxiliary precautions needed due to human nature and political dynamics.

Legislative Authority

  • Legislative branch naturally predominates in a republic.
  • To mitigate, division into different branches is necessary:
    • Different election modes.
    • Different principles of action.

Double Security in Compound Republic

  • Power divided between two distinct governments:
    • National
    • State
  • Each government subdivides into separate departments.
  • Result: Double security for people's rights.

Protecting Against Majority Injustice

  • Society should protect against oppression by rulers and between societal factions.
  • Different interests exist; majority might threaten minority rights.

Methods Against Majority Injustice

  1. Creating a will independent of the majority: precarious security.
  2. Incorporating diverse interests in the society:
    • Minimize unjust majority combinations.
    • Exemplified in the U.S. federal republic.

Justice as the End of Government

  • Pursuit of justice is the goal of civil society.
  • Protects against anarchy where stronger factions can oppress the weaker.
  • Government should protect all, not just dominant factions.