Xcel Energy Cabin Creek Tragedy Overview

Sep 5, 2024

Xcel Energy Tragedy - Cabin Creek Hydroelectric Plant

Overview

  • Date: October 2, 2007
  • Location: 40 miles west of Denver, Colorado
  • Incident: Five contract painters trapped by a chemical fire inside a hydroelectric plant tunnel owned by Xcel Energy.

Key Details

  • Cause of Fire: Combustible coatings and solvents blocked the only escape route, 1400 feet away.
  • Emergency Response: No properly trained responders available for rescue; workers had no escape.
  • Chemical Safety Board (CSB) Findings:
    • Xcel Energy and contractor RPI Coating inadequately evaluated work dangers.
    • RPI workers entered a confined space with flammable solvents, little training, and no emergency plan.

Background

  • Cabin Creek Hydroelectric Plant:
    • Located in a mountainous area, 6 miles from Georgetown, Colorado.
    • Features a 4,000-foot tunnel (penstock) carrying water between reservoirs.
    • Tunnel lined deteriorated; RPI contracted for recoating.

Incident Timeline

  • September 2007: Recoating project begins.
  • October 2, 2007: RPI workers bring 10 gallons of methyl ethyl ketone (MEK) into the penstock.
  • 1:00 PM: Eleven workers start coating operation.
  • 2:00 PM: MEK vapors ignite (likely by static electricity), causing a flash fire.
    • Fire spreads rapidly, blocking five workers' escape.
    • Fire extinguishers unavailable inside the penstock; trapped workers attempt to communicate for help.
  • 2:11 PM: Emergency personnel arrive but lack training for rescue in confined spaces.
    • Workers instructed to move deeper; they struggle with smoke inhalation.
  • 3:40 PM: Specialized rescue unit arrives too late; trapped workers had already died from smoke inhalation.

Contributing Factors

  • Lack of rescue preparedness: Emergency responders untrained in confined space rescues.
  • Contractor Selection Issues: RPI had a poor safety record yet won the bidding process based on low cost.
  • Inadequate Oversight by Xcel Energy: Safety performance of RPI not adequately monitored.

Regulatory and Safety Implications

  • Safety Regulations:
    • Need for regulatory limits on flammable materials in confined spaces.
    • CSB recommends Colorado develop firefighter training for confined space rescue.
    • Call for OSHA to amend regulations for permit-required confined spaces.
  • Historical Context:
    • Since 1993, 53 serious accidents linked to flammable atmospheres in confined spaces, resulting in 45 fatalities.
    • Existing guidelines not sufficiently protective; need for clear safety limits.

Quotes

  • Captain Steve Aseltine: Highlights challenges of confined space rescue.
  • Holmstrom: Emphasizes the importance of recognizing hazards and establishing safety limits.
  • Bresland: Calls for diligence in assessing risks and planning for emergencies to prevent future tragedies.

Conclusion

  • The tragedy at Xcel Energy's Cabin Creek Plant underscores the critical need for proper safety protocols, training, and regulatory oversight in confined spaces to prevent similar incidents in the future.