📊

Understanding Standard Review Engagements

Apr 23, 2025

Lecture on Standard on Review Engagements (SRE) 2400

Introduction

  • Lecturer: C. Balakrishna from Lecture Pedia
  • Topic: Revision of SRE 2400
  • Series: Two main standards SRE 2400 and SRE 2014-10
  • Objective: Understand the difference between audit and review, as well as the application of SRE 2400 and SRE 2014-10

Key Concepts

Audit vs. Review

  • Audit: Provides reasonable assurance and positively worded opinions
    • E.g., "Financial statements are free from material misstatements."
  • Review: Provides limited assurance and negatively worded conclusions
    • E.g., "Based on our procedures, we have not come across any material misstatements."

Assurance Levels

  • Reasonable Assurance: Confirms financial statements are free from material misstatements
  • Limited Assurance: States financial statements may have misstatements, but none were found in the review

Conducting Audits and Reviews

  • Audit: Must be conducted by a Chartered Accountant (CA)
  • Review: Also conducted by a CA, as per the standards

Standards on Review Engagements

SRE 2400 and SRE 2014-10

  • SRE 2400: Engagement to review historical financial statements
  • SRE 2014-10: Review of interim financial statements by the entity's independent auditor

Application of Standards

  • SRE 2400: Used when reviewed by a CA other than the entity's auditor
    • Example: A company needs financial statements reviewed for a bank loan agreement
    • Example: A partnership firm voluntarily wants its financials reviewed
  • SRE 2014-10: Used when reviewed by the statutory auditor of the company (e.g., for listed companies as per LODR regulations)

Ethical Requirements and Preconditions

  • Practitioner (Review): Must comply with ethical standards including integrity, objectivity, and independence
  • Preconditions for Engagement:
    • Acceptable financial reporting framework
    • Management’s agreement on responsibilities and providing necessary information
    • Unrestricted access to relevant data within the entity

Review Engagement Process

Steps in Review Engagement

  1. Understand Entity and Environment
  2. Determine Materiality: Professional judgment required
  3. Design and Perform Review Procedures
    • Mainly inquiry and analytical procedures
    • Additional procedures in specific circumstances (e.g., related parties, non-compliance)

Specific Circumstances

  • Related Parties: Alert to uncommunicated relationships/transactions
  • Non-compliance: Communicate with management; assess need for external reporting
  • Going Concern: Assess management's future action plans
  • Use of others' work: Assess adequacy for reliance

Written Representations and Conclusions

Written Representations

  • Responsibilities regarding financial statements
  • Related party transactions and non-compliance disclosures
  • Assess integrity and reliability of management's representations

Types of Conclusions

  • Unmodified Conclusion: No issues found that would mislead as per the framework
  • Modified Conclusion: Include qualified, adverse, or disclaimer of conclusion

Presentation and Documentation

Practitioner Report

  • Components:
    • Title and address
    • Introductory paragraph
    • Management and practitioner responsibilities
    • Conclusion paragraph
    • Basis for conclusion
    • Signature and date

Additional Reporting Elements

  • Emphasis of Matter and Other Matter Paragraphs: Highlight important details or additional information
  • Documentation: Maintain records of the review process

Conclusion

  • Overview of SRE 2400 and practical applications
  • Further discussions will cover SRE 2014-10