📚

Kohlberg's Moral Development Stages Explained

Mar 6, 2025

Lawrence Kohlberg's Theory of Moral Development

Introduction

  • Kohlberg's theory states that moral reasoning develops in six stages, divided into three levels: pre-conventional, conventional, and post-conventional.
  • Moral reasoning is exemplified through a schoolyard conflict where different individuals at various stages exhibit different reactions and justifications.

The Six Stages of Moral Development

Pre-conventional Level

Stage 1: Obedience and Punishment

  • Moral judgments are based on avoiding punishment.
  • Example: Finn doesn't help his friend Tom in a fight because he fears punishment.

Stage 2: Self-interest

  • Decisions are made based on personal gain.
  • Example: Mary helps Tom because she thinks he might help her in the future.

Conventional Level

Stage 3: Interpersonal Accord and Conformity

  • Moral reasoning guided by peer pressure and desire for social approval.
  • Example: Betty doesn't intervene in the fight because she wants to conform to the group's behavior.

Stage 4: Authority and Social Order

  • Emphasis on maintaining law and order through respecting authority.
  • Example: The teacher intervenes to stop the fight to uphold school rules and maintain order.

Post-conventional Level

Stage 5: Social Contract

  • Rules are understood as social contracts; morality judged by utility and justice.
  • Example: Jessie questions whether the rules serve the community's interests.

Stage 6: Universal Ethical Principles

  • Guided by abstract principles of justice and compassion.
  • Example: The headmaster believes in disobeying unjust rules and emphasizes understanding and compassion.
  • Not everyone reaches this level.

Connection to Piaget's Theory

  • Kohlberg's theory is based on Piaget's cognitive development theory.
  • Kohlberg conducted interviews with boys aged 10-16 to analyze moral reasoning through hypothetical dilemmas.

The Heinz Dilemma

  • A moral dilemma presented by Kohlberg: whether Heinz should steal a drug to save his wife.
  • Questions to consider:
    • Should Heinz have stolen the drug?
    • Would the situation change if Heinz didn't love his wife?
    • What if the dying person was a stranger?
    • Should the druggist be blamed for murder if the wife died?

Conclusion

  • Kohlberg's stages reflect increasing complexity and abstraction in moral reasoning.
  • Encouragement to reflect on moral dilemmas and engage in discussion.

  • Subscribe and support educational content creators to help explain complex subjects in simple ways.
  • Visit www.patreon.com/sprouts to support their educational mission.