🌀

Exploring the Kalam Cosmological Argument

Jun 4, 2025

Lecture Notes: William Lane Craig’s Kalam Cosmological Argument

Introduction

  • Subject: William Lane Craig’s Kalam Cosmological Argument for the existence of God.
  • Presenter: William Lane Craig, a well-known Christian philosopher and theologian.
    • Research Professor at Talbot School of Theology.
    • Renowned for debating atheists, scientists, and philosophers globally.
  • Focus: Craig's version of the argument aims to show that the universe began to exist at a finite time, aligning with biblical creation narratives.

Comparison with Argument from Contingency

  • Richard Taylor’s Argument: World’s dependence on God.
    • Compatible with the notion of an eternal world.
    • Example: Eternal flame and beams of light.
  • Craig’s Kalam Argument: Tries to prove the universe had a temporal beginning.
    • Aimed at aligning with biblical creation (“In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth”).

Historical Influence

  • Influenced by Al-Ghazali, a 12th-century Muslim theologian.
    • Original formulation:
      1. Whatever begins to exist has a cause.
      2. The universe began to exist.
      3. Therefore, the universe has a cause.
  • Craig’s Reformulation:
    • Premise 1: If the universe began to exist, then it has a cause.
    • Focus on the whole universe, avoiding subatomic particles debate.

Reasons for Craig’s Premise 1 (1’)

  1. Something cannot come from nothing: Ex nihilo nihil fit.
  2. Inexplicability of spontaneous existence: Difficult to explain why only the universe comes from nothing if possible.
  3. Scientific and common experience evidence: Big Bang theory supports a universe beginning.

Premise 2: Universe Began to Exist

  • Scientific Evidence: Big Bang Theory.
    • Universe began 13-14 billion years ago.
    • Astronomy and astrophysics suggest no eternal past.
    • Everything, including space and time, began with the Big Bang.
  • Philosophical Defense:
    • Impossibility of an actually infinite number of past events.

Argument Against Infinite Past Events

  • Premise: If the universe did not have a beginning, past events are infinite.
  • David Hilbert’s Support: Actual infinity is not found in reality, only an idea.
  • Craig’s Conclusion: Universe must have begun to exist due to the impossibility of infinite past events.

Actual Infinite vs Potential Infinite

  • Actual Infinite:
    • Collection with an infinite number of members (e.g., infinite set of books).
    • Unique traits: Part equals the whole, nothing can be added.
  • Potential Infinite:
    • Can be added to, always finite but extendable.
    • Example: Finite library can be added to.

Conclusion

  • Craig argues that the infinite, in reality, is impossible, supporting the universe's beginning.
  • End of the video with a promise to delve deeper in the next session into philosophical arguments against infinite past events.