NOAK Use and Current Evidence Lecture

Jun 13, 2024

NOAK Use and Current Evidence Lecture

Introduction

  • Speaker: Dr. Anand
  • Topic: NOAK use and current evidence
  • Main Points:
    • Overlap with previous talks on trials
    • Importance of understanding trials and current evidence

NOAK Overview

  • NOAK: Newer Oral Anticoagulants (Direct Oral Anticoagulants)
  • Function: Act on coagulation pathway (extrinsic, intrinsic, common pathways)

FDA Approved Prophylactic Indications

  • Orthopedic Surgery (prevention of VTE):
    • Rivaroxaban: 2011
    • Apixaban: 2014
    • Edoxaban: 2015
  • Stroke Prevention (Non-valvular AF):
    • Dabigatran, Rivaroxaban, Apixaban, Edoxaban: various years
  • Treatment of Venous Thromboembolism (VTE):
    • All NOAKs including Betrixaban (recent: 2017)
  • Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS):
    • Rivaroxaban, Apixaban: in guidelines but not formally FDA approved

Key Differences Between NOAKs and Warfarin

  • NOAKs:
    • Fixed dose, no INR monitoring, less bleeding risk, higher cost
  • Warfarin:
    • Predictable, liver excretion, requires INR monitoring, dietary interactions, narrow therapeutic window

Evidence and Trials

  • Largest Meta-analysis in Lancet (2014):
    • 72,683 patients, 48 RCTs
    • NOAKs vs. Warfarin
    • Reduced stroke/systemic thrombosis, all-cause mortality, intracranial bleed
    • Higher GI bleed
    • Low-dose NOAKs: ineffective for stroke/systemic thrombosis

Landmark Trials

  • RE-LY (2009):
    • Dabigatran vs. Warfarin
    • 110 mg: similar efficacy, less bleeding
    • 150 mg: higher efficacy, similar bleeding
  • ROCKET-AF (2011):
    • Rivaroxaban vs. Warfarin
    • Non-inferior efficacy, less intracranial/fatal bleed
  • ARISTOTLE (2011):
    • Apixaban vs. Warfarin
    • Higher efficacy, less major/intracranial bleed
  • ENGAGE-AF (2013):
    • Edoxaban (high and low dose) vs. Warfarin
    • High dose: more effective, low dose: less effective
    • Less major bleed, less cardiovascular death
  • Observational Study: Apixaban in end-stage renal disease
    • Higher dose effective for stroke/systemic thrombosis
    • Less bleeding risk
  • Recent Study (2024): Apixaban vs. Aspirin in subclinical AF
    • Lower stroke/systemic thrombosis
    • Higher major bleed compared to aspirin

Recommendations and Dosages

  • Atrial Fibrillation:
    • Apixaban: 5 mg BD (2.5 mg for specific conditions)
    • Dabigatran: 150 mg BD
    • Edoxaban: 60 mg OD (30 mg for low body weight/clearance)
    • Rivaroxaban: 20 mg OD (15 mg for low clearance)
  • Treatment of VTE:
    • Initial: LMW Heparin, followed by NOAK (Dabigatran, Edoxaban)
    • Apixaban 10 mg BD for 7 days, then 5mg BD
    • Rivaroxaban 15 mg BD for 21 days, then 20 mg OD
  • Prevention in Cancer and Orthopedic Surgeries:
    • Apixaban: 2.5 mg BD
    • Dabigatran: 150 mg BD
    • Rivaroxaban: 10 mg OD
    • Edoxaban: 60 mg OD

Considerations

  • Endorsements: Various guidelines support these recommendations
  • Concerns: Most trials are Pharma-funded, not institution driven

Take-Home Messages

  • NOAKs: Effective in both prophylaxis and treatment
  • Main Use: Stroke prevention in AF, VTE prevention in orthopedic surgeries, treatment of VTE
  • Physiological Plausibility: Validated by current evidence
  • Caution: Consider Pharma funding bias in trials

Call to Action

  • Submit Work: Journal of Acute Care (quarterly publications)
  • Website: Visit Pra.com for more information.

Conclusion

  • Thank you for attending!