Gravitational waves and their significance in cosmology
Bayesian parameter estimation
Selection effects (if time permits)
Projections for future research and open questions
Gravitational Waveforms
Key Characteristics
Amplitude and Phase
Sensitive to both amplitude and phase (unlike electromagnetic astronomy, which primarily measures intensity)
Ability to track phase evolution
Importance of amplitude and phase sensitivity in cosmology
Differences Between Optical Astronomy and Gravitational Wave Astronomy
Gravitational wave astronomy looks for coherent sources
Relationship between amplitude and distance
Amplitude falls off as (1/R) while intensity in optical astronomy falls off as (1/R^2)
Sensitivities: Doubling detector sensitivity extends observational range twices for gravitational waves, whereas only (\sqrt{2}) times for electromagnetic methods
Types of Gravitational Wave Sources
Transients (short duration)
Compact Binary Coalescence (CBC)
Unmodeled burst signals (e.g., supernovae)
Long Duration or Background
Continuous waves (e.g., from neutron stars with distortions)
Stochastic backgrounds (accumulated from many sources)
Non-Event Sources
Primordial background: Key for cosmology, but difficult to detect currently
Stochastic background: Combination of various sources like CBCs, supernovae, etc.
Modeling Gravitational Waveforms
Three Phases of a Waveform
In-spiral: Can be calculated using post-Newtonian expansions
Merger: Requires numerical relativity
Ring-down: Can utilize black hole perturbation theory but needs fitting from numerical relativity
Source Parameters
Black Holes: Masses, Spins (6 parameters for double black holes)
Neutron Stars: Additional parameters for matter (tidal deformability, etc.). Neutron star parameters increase total to 8+ parameters
Parameter Extraction and Distance Measurement
Gravitational wave data allows direct measurement of distance independent of a “distance ladder”