Coconote
AI notes
AI voice & video notes
Try for free
ðŸ§
Evaluating the Multi-Store Model of Memory
May 18, 2025
Lecture on the Multi-Store Model of Memory
Introduction
Part three of a series exploring the multi-store model of memory
Previous videos covered the structure, processes, coding capacity, and duration
Current focus: Evaluation of the multi-store model
Supporting Evidence for the Multi-Store Model
Primacy and Recency Effect
Primacy Effect:
Items at the beginning of a list are recalled because they are transferred to long-term memory with rehearsal.
Recency Effect:
Items at the end of a list are recalled because they are still in short-term memory.
Middle items are often forgotten, indicating limited short-term memory capacity.
Demonstrates separate stores for short-term and long-term memory.
Case Study of Patient HM
Patient HM suffered from epilepsy after a childhood bicycle accident.
Surgery removed parts of the brain (including the hippocampus), reducing epilepsy but impacting memory.
HM could not form new long-term memories but retained short-term memory abilities.
Supports the idea of separate stores for short-term and long-term memory.
Criticisms of the Multi-Store Model
Artificial Tasks in Lab Experiments
Research often involves tasks not representative of everyday memory use.
Example: Peterson and Peterson's trigram study with counting backwards is atypical.
Results may lack ecological validity, limiting generalization to real-world settings.
Oversimplification of Long-Term Memory
The model treats long-term memory as a single entity.
Further research identifies multiple components:
Procedural Memories:
Actions and motor skills (e.g., tying shoelaces).
Episodic Memories:
Personal experiences (e.g., last birthday).
Semantic Memories:
Knowledge and facts (e.g., capital of Sweden).
Model's lack of detail undermines comprehensive explanation of memory.
Oversimplification of Short-Term Memory
Evidence suggests multiple components in short-term memory.
Case Study of KF
:
Motorcycle accident led to impaired verbal short-term memory.
Visual short-term memory relatively unaffected.
Suggests existence of verbal and visual components in short-term memory.
Conclusion
Limitations suggest the multi-store model is not a complete explanation of memory.
Upcoming exploration of the working memory model, emphasizing different short-term memory components.
Encouragement to watch the next video in the series.
📄
Full transcript