Lecture Notes: Gender Differences in Moral Dilemmas by Carol Gilligan
Introduction
Focus on differences in moral reasoning between men and women.
Women emphasize relational aspects in moral dilemmas.
Women's Moral Reasoning
Women consider the impact of their actions on relationships.
Challenge the traditional individualistic approach to moral dilemmas.
Emphasize awareness of relationships and interconnectedness.
Vietnam War Context
Discussion of moral dilemmas during the Vietnam War draft.
Men avoided discussing their relational concerns due to societal expectations.
Novel "The Plague" used to explore themes of responsibility and relationships.
Critique of Traditional Theories
Traditional theories often depict men as abstract thinkers.
These theories didn't capture the relational aspects of real-life decision-making.
Importance of listening to diverse women's voices to understand moral reasoning.
"In a Different Voice"
Gilligan's book title signifies a new perspective on moral reasoning.
Shift from "whose rights take precedence" to "what is the responsible action" in relationships.
Case Study Example
A nurse faces a dilemma: to continue a pregnancy or not.
Factors: health risks, existing child, husband’s unemployment, religious beliefs.
Highlights the complexity of relational and moral decision-making.
Ethics of Selflessness vs. Selfishness
Women often described as selfless, prioritizing others' needs.
Gilligan challenges the notion that considering one's own needs is selfish.
Explores the balance between responsiveness to others and self-concern.
Conclusion
The discovery of shared experiences among women about moral reasoning.
The importance of advocating for the expression of women's perspectives in moral discussions.
"In a Different Voice" encapsulates the idea that moral reasoning is not the same for everyone and should be inclusive of different voices and experiences.