Transcript for:
Critique of BBC's Documentary Bias

ladies and gentlemen I had the following video recommended to me the trap we will force you to be free by the BBC now I've seen this apparently a series of videos about I don't know what the hell it's about I've watched them the BBC I want you to be on alert for this they will do videos they will do documentaries like they did one on body language right I want you to be alert to this watch out they did the thing on body language where you think they would say you know here's how body language hazards on the subway someone's offended away you know who knows what kind of stuff but it was completely not what you'd expect yeah I expected something about body language and people but the BBC took it to a tirade against America and it showed American the American president and President Putin and talked about how body language is somehow involved in such terrible stupid so watch out for the BBC throwing together a good interesting title and then it's actually just a hodgepodge of junk to say that they hate America or two they think they're proving America's terrible well let me talk I've got a two pages of notes your page and have a notes on this ridiculous documentary first off they mentioned Isaiah Berlin an Oxford alumni from for Britain he has he's defined two types of Liberty this is this is this is um this is run-of-the-mill regular stuff for this type of person they still do it today if you heard of the net neutrality acts the net neutrality act was they want to keep the government neutral supposedly well if you open it up on the second page or whatever it's very quickly obviously the net neutrality act is not net neutral it is to establish taxation and government control over the net so the government can can milk money out of the internet billions of dollars probably a year would come from them having control like that and that's called the net neutrality act well people who are shady will make up things that are ridiculous so there's two types of Liberty there's positive Liberty and there's negative Liberty now if I just walk ups somebody on the street city like positive Liberty or negative Liberty they're going to have plus positive sounds good right dyon like negative Liberty that's bad but positive and negative means in positive Liberty people are willing to actually act in favor of their theory of Liberty negative Liberty however is just protecting you from other people acting against your on you so negative Liberty is like negative rights it doesn't positive rights would mean you have a right to a home you have a right to health care that's a positive write a negative right is you have a right not to be interfered with you have a right not to have your property taken you have a right not to be text that sort of thing well here's here's what they say at seven minutes and 50 seconds in video number one this guy Isaiah Berlin says if you believe that there is a single answer to a single question the true the true answer all others being false then there's the temptation to do terrible things okay right there I mean the flag should have gone up when you saw them is by the BBC but if not the flags need to go up right there they're saying that people who believe that they know something for certain are likely to do terrible things or there's the possibility that they'll do terrible things now it's just the really stupid statement he believes that that is the one true answer this situation and he will probably do terrible things in order to defend this like for example actual cases of Liberty attack freedom attack rationality and reason write books that are horrible I don't know any books he wrote but I'll bet he was no good from the stuff he says here in this video obviously it's no good just the fact of believing you're right means there's the possibility of the terrible things therefore we should avoid that we should avoid being correct about stuff or believing that we're correct that's what they want is eternal skepticism never believe you've got the entire idea and the right answer because you might be a bad guy after that right because you might not have the right answer so his response to this corrupt idea of the corrupt idea of positive liberating his response is negative Liberty the freedom of all individuals to do what they want and nothing more including not hurt other individuals because those individuals have the right to do what they want nothing more does he believe this does he believe that that is the true answer that all other answers are false it seems he does must have his head on backwards from two minutes to three minutes they assert the positive Liberty is enjoyed by him has enjoyed a massive resurgence after world war two and that the believers in negative Liberty remember these are people who were certain of their view they responded with quote a strange and mutant idea it's a three minutes and two seconds in video number two a strange and mutant idea now here's the thesis of the film yes it took 13 minutes for them to get to their thesis yes if they have a thesis this hodgepodge of nonsense but their thesis is that they would use violent and revolutionary techniques to create a world of negative freedom negative Liberty full stop what is so strange and mutant about that I don't get it we we used violence and revolutionary techniques to establish the goddamn country to begin with so what's so strange and mutant we would then use the same tactics to prevent slavery and communism and whatnot from happening around the world why is that such a strange a mutant idea so this is just the BBC will say a bunch of that if you're listening you'll be like yeah that's interesting historical evidence for this that or the other and then a completely unrelated statement they'll say things like the strange and mutant idea and they'll use emotive words emotional words words that bring with them value assumptions and the lots of baggage they'll use those words unjustifiably me what the hell that's not a strange in me an idea it seems like it was an idea that was over 150 years old at the end of World War two a BBC for you alright so the videos basic thesis is America committed itself to defending Liberty by using physical force and that's why the title is we will force you to be free and then somehow this is is awry from what's correct and moral it's off off the tracks it's not correct immoral and then America goes awry trying to practice this evil doctrine of using physical force to make people free now if even if it were true that our government we're doing this negative Liberty thing going around the world trying to establish negative Liberty by force that's not and then and then forcing people to be free that is not a violation of their rights or anything so physical force was used okay and now the people are free it's how can you say the rights have been violated for example the people of Germany in Japan and South Korea how have their rights been violated by us giving them a free society we went instead won't have any more on this here's your Constitution have a nice day how did we violate their rights so what if it we are forcing them to be free once you forced them to be free and they're free you can't force anymore it's down game over there free so the BBC really pisses me like I don't like them I like any of them although once in while I do a good video on like the evolution of monkeys or something you have to watch out there too and archaeology and history of mankind before riding and stuff watch out for the stuff they do on that too they'll always interview some french guy who says that in this time everybody was equal insist that's a German accent I don't know what I'm doing with that but they'll say everything everybody was equal and there was no discrimination between men and women in these villages and there was no show of wealth or anything it was like a little Marxist utopia and they'll just do this with a straight face and go on as if nothing strangers just happened immense stupid things men said so watch out for anything and everything the BBC produces particularly if it's about anything from the 1800 forward because if it's about that then it's probably just a tirade against America now assuming this project were on the rails assuming it's being carried forward by our government we