Essential Insights on Legal Writing

Aug 29, 2024

Lecture Notes on Legal Writing and Key Legal Cases

Introduction

  • Recording Notice: Classmates who aren't present may feel left out of the laughter.
  • Feedback Clarification: Extensive feedback doesn't indicate poor performance but aims to guide improvement.
  • Improvement: Teaching emphasizes continuous improvement in writing skills.

Writing Tips

  1. Avoid Filler Words: Be cautious of using unnecessary language.
  2. First-person Prohibition: Avoid using 'I' in academic writing.
  3. Confident Writing: Avoid prefaces like 'it might be' or 'I could be wrong'.
    • Evoke confidence in your arguments.
    • Ensure writing is strong and concise.

Legal Writing Considerations

  • Legal Advice Phrasing: Avoid saying 'I think' and instead state legal positions firmly.
  • National and Regional Powers: Consider the possibility of both being applicable.
  • Conclusion Focus: The rationale behind conclusions is more important than the conclusions themselves.
  • Incorporating Readings: Use references such as federalist papers or case law to strengthen arguments.

Discussion Assignment Guidelines

  • Assignment Parts: Two parts, each limited to 100 words, for a total of 200 words.
  • Case Law Usage:
    • Use case law thoughtfully and appropriately.
    • Ensure it supports and strengthens your argument.

Key Legal Cases

Marbury v. Madison

  • Judicial Review: Established the Supreme Court’s power to say what the law is.
  • Historical Context: Conflict between Federalists and Anti-Federalists shaped the case.
  • Outcome: Asserted judicial review without directly confronting the executive branch.

McCulloch v. Maryland

  • Federalism Defined: Key case defining the balance of power between federal and state governments.
  • Elastic Clause: Expanded federal power under necessary and proper clause.

Gibbons v. Ogden

  • Interstate Commerce: Defined federal power over interstate commerce.
  • Outcome: Federal license held supremacy over state license.

Printz v. United States

  • Federal Mandates: Limited federal power to compel state officials to enforce federal laws.
  • 10th Amendment: Focused on dual sovereignty and protection of state powers.

Federalist Paper No. 78

  • Judiciary Power: Addressed concerns about judiciary’s independence and power.
  • Hamilton’s Defense: Argued for judicial review as necessary for balanced governance.

Conclusion

  • Writing and Discussion: Emphasize logical support for conclusions.
  • Future Considerations: Keep exploring the historical context of legal decisions.

Additional Notes

  • Class Participation: Encourage active questions and engagement.
  • Reference Style: Mentioning the case name is sufficient; no formal citation required.