Lecture on Creating AI Automated YouTube Channels

Introduction

• Topic: Creation and testing of an AI automated YouTube channel
• Problems with claims: Many videos claim high earnings from AI automation without showing results
  • Clickbait titles and thumbnails
  • Incomplete automation (many manual steps involved)

Experiment Overview

• Goal: Upload videos daily for a month using as much automation as possible
• Comparison: Create a second channel with manually created videos
• Purpose: Test audience preference for AI vs. human content and feasibility of full automation

Automated Channel Setup

1. Idea Generation: Asked ChatGPT for video ideas
2. Styles Chosen: Quote of the Day and Random Fact Compilation
3. Process Breakdown:
   • Quote of the Day:
     • Quotes sourced from ChatGPT (one-time manual task)
     • Background videos from Pexels API
     • Voiceover from 11 Labs AI text-to-speech
     • Subtitles created using Vosk speech recognition
     • All components edited using ffmpeg
   • Outcome: Python script to fully automate video creation
   • Example Quote: "The mind is like a parachute, it only works when it’s open."

Manual Channel Setup

1. Content Creation: Similar content but manually created
2. Tasks Involved: Collecting quotes and facts, voiceover, and editing
3. Objective: Test if human-created content performs better

Initial Results

• Upload Schedule:
  • AI: Daily quote videos, fact videos every third day
  • Human: Same schedule for comparison
• Observations:
  • Human channel gained more views and subscribers initially
  • Fact videos performed better than quote videos across both channels
  • AI channel began uploading 3 videos/day for realistic automation test

Mid-Experiment Adjustments

• Second Style Quotes: Added intro and short quotes
• Increased AI Output: AI channel started catching up in views
• Subscribers Data: AI channel having more subscribers
  • Fact videos generated more views
  • Quote videos generated more subscribers

Experiment Conclusion

• Total Results: 76,000 views and 330 subscribers for AI channel
• Final Observations:
  • Human channel had higher average views per video
  • AI channel uploaded more but many videos had low view counts
• Content Quality: Automated videos generally lower quality
• Monetization: Challenging to achieve with automated content due to high view requirements
• Future Use: Useful tools to speed up workflow but content still better manually created

Summary

• Conclusion: Full AI automation is not recommended for high-quality content
• Potential: AI tools can assist but not replace human creativity
• Final thoughts: Focus on quality rather than quantity for better viewer engagement

Promotion

• Learning Coding: Sponsored by Brilliant.org
  • Resource for learning Python and other STEM subjects