🐢

Hawksbill Turtle Phylogeography Study

Feb 21, 2025

Global Phylogeography of the Critically Endangered Hawksbill Turtle (Eretmochelys imbricata)

Introduction

  • Global Study of Migratory Species: Rarely conducted comprehensively; leads to fragmented info on evolutionary history.
  • Sea Turtles: Cosmopolitan, migrate across ocean basins.
    • Structured nesting populations vs. diverse foraging stocks.
  • Phylogeographic Studies: Use genetic/distribution data for insights into origin, distribution, dynamics.
    • Important for structuring sea turtle populations, estimating gene flow, and understanding migrations.
  • Mitochondrial DNA Markers: Common in sea turtle studies; control region (D-loop) used for analysis.
    • Data often limited to local populations; need for global data integration.
  • Hawksbill Turtle: Critically endangered, threatened by human activities and coral reef degradation.

Material and Methods

Data Collection

  • Compilation of mtDNA haplotypes from GenBank and Atlantic Ocean database.
  • Focused on haplotypes with population frequency data.
  • Populations with small sample sizes grouped by proximity.
  • Standardized nomenclature: EiA (Atlantic) and EiIP (Indo-Pacific).

Phylogenetic Analysis

  • Used BEAST software for lineage divergence times.
  • Model: TrN+G+I with gamma shape and invariable proportion.
  • Assumed rate homogeneity (strict molecular clock).
  • Conducted runs for 200 million generations.

Genetic Diversity and Population Structure

  • Estimated haplotype diversity, nucleotide differences, and population structure using DnaSP and PopART.
  • Pairwise FST for population differentiation.
  • SAMOVA used for grouping populations based on genetic variance.

Results

  • Haplotype Distribution: 1983 individuals analyzed; 88 haplotypes in rookeries, 79 in foraging aggregations.
  • Haplotype Ambiguities: Found and standardized nomenclature discrepancies.
  • Lineage Divergence: Identified nine major mtDNA clades with divergence times from Pliocene and Pleistocene epochs.
  • Genetic Diversity: Higher in Indo-Pacific than Atlantic populations.
  • Population Structure: Significant differentiation in Indo-Pacific vs. Atlantic; complex regional groupings.

Discussion

Genetic Stocks

  • Phylogeographic Patterns: Higher diversity in Indo-Pacific, no shared haplotypes between major oceanic basins.
  • Complex Connectivity: Weak isolation by distance, influenced by ocean currents.
  • Regional Grouping Challenges: Different tests suggest varied groupings.

Migration Patterns

  • Foraging Aggregations: Mixed stocks; evidence of transoceanic movements.
  • Unknown Origins: Many haplotypes without known source rookeries.
  • Conservation Implications: Need for more sampling and tracking to understand migrations.

Phylogenetic History and Divergence Time

  • Major Lineage Divergence: Atlantic and Indo-Pacific split in early Pliocene.
  • Impact of Climate: Pleistocene climate cycles influenced genetic divergence.
  • Recent Expansions: Lineages expanded during warmer periods.

Conclusions

  • Divergent Lineages: Two major lineages split in early Pliocene, with population movements influenced by climate and currents.
  • Data Standardization: Importance of comprehensive global data and collaboration.
  • Conservation Needs: Highlighted need for international efforts and standardized data collection.

Acknowledgments

  • Thanks to contributors and supporting organizations like CAPES, CNPq, FAPEMIG, and specific individuals for data and assistance.