🏗️

Analysis of the Hyatt Regency Collapse

Apr 7, 2025

Hyatt Regency Collapse Lecture Notes

Speaker Introduction

  • Professor: Paul Spenden
  • Institution: Liberty University School of Law

Overview of the Hyatt Regency Collapse

  • Date of Incident: July 17, 1981
  • Location: Kansas City, Hyatt Regency Hotel
  • Event: Tea dance in the hotel's atrium
  • Casualties: 114 deaths, hundreds injured

Background of the Investigation

  • Role of Professor Spenden: Assistant Attorney General advising the Board of Architects, Professional Engineers, and Land Surveyors on legal aspects of the investigation.
  • Focus: Gathering evidence and anticipating litigation.

Details of the Collapse

  • Cause: Failure of structural design and engineering calculations, specifically regarding steel connections of the bridges.
  • Professional Engineer's Misunderstanding:
    • Belief that he only needed to provide a basic design and had no further responsibility.
    • Lack of communication with other engineers and professionals involved.

Key Players Involved

  • Structural Engineers: Jack D. Gillum and Dan Duncan were responsible for the design and structural drawings.
  • Fabricator: Haven Steel (William Richie noticed issues during fabrication).
  • Architect: Herb Duncan also expressed concerns regarding aesthetics and safety.

Critical Design Flaws

  • Initial Design: Bridges intended to be connected by a single continuous rod.
  • Proposed Change: Split the rod at the fourth-floor bridge, which raised concerns about safety.
  • Lack of Calculations:
    • No calculations were performed to check the safety of the new design.
    • Dan Duncan assured safety without verifying calculations.

Miscommunication and Oversight

  • Failures in Communication:
    • Lack of clear communication about responsibilities among engineers and architects led to serious design flaws.
  • Reassurance to Owners: Engineers falsely reassured hotel owners that all steel connections were checked, which was not the case.

Legal and Professional Consequences

  • Findings After Investigation:
    • Administrative law judge rendered over 400 pages of findings.
    • Jack Gillum and Dan Duncan found to have violated Missouri’s Practice Act for Professional Engineers.
  • Licenses Revoked: Licenses of Gillum, Duncan, and their firm (GCE Consultants) were revoked.
  • Court Affirmation: Missouri circuit courts and Missouri Court of Appeals upheld the decision.

Lessons Learned

  • Importance of Communication: Structural engineers must communicate clearly regarding their roles and responsibilities.
  • Education Gaps: Potential failures in engineering education about legal obligations and responsibilities.
  • Public Safety Responsibility: Professional engineers must prioritize public safety in their designs and communications.

Aftermath and Rebuilding

  • Owner's Response: To restore public confidence, the hotel owner replaced the flawed bridges with new designs supported by columns extending to bedrock.
  • Structural Integrity Improvement: New design aims to be significantly more secure against potential disasters.