Lecture: South Carolina's Added Value Growth Model
Introduction
- Speaker: Matthew Lavry, Director of Research, South Carolina Education Oversight Committee (EOC)
- Focus: Transition of South Carolina's educational accountability to a new value-added model for student progress indicators
- Objective: Reward year-to-year growth towards standard proficiency
Background
- South Carolina historically values student growth in its accountability system.
- Previous Model: Used a value table to award points when students moved to a higher achievement level.
- Issue: Prioritized students close to cut scores, also known as "bubble kids."
- Norm-Referenced Value-Added Model: Compared year-to-year increase in achievement scores to typical increases statewide.
- Issue: Lacked direct connection to grade level proficiency.
Development of the Added Value Growth Model
- Goal: Combine the best of previous models, focusing on proficiency and growth for all students.
- Model Type: Criterion-referenced value-added model.
- Individualized Growth Targets: For grades four through eight to move towards proficiency.
Methodology
- Historical SC READY scores (2017-2019) used to determine typical growth.
- Average growth differs by grade level and prior year score.
- Finding: Growth percentiles are used to create individualized growth targets.
Growth Percentiles
- Conditional Growth Percentiles: Used to set growth targets based on prior scores.
- Examples:
- 50th growth percentile means typical growth.
- Higher percentiles (60th, 70th, etc.) indicate greater than typical growth.
Individualized Growth Targets
- Median Annual Target (MAT): Reflects typical gains (50th percentile).
- Schools earn points for meeting/exceeding MAT.
- Added Value Target (AVT): Progressive and based on prior achievement levels.
- Designed to move students towards proficiency.
Application of AVTs
- Case Study: The Added Value Family
- Six hypothetical children with different achievement levels.
- Illustrated how different growth percentiles shift achievement levels over five years.
- Outcome: Most children meet or exceed grade level standards within five years.
Potential Impact
- Visualization: Shows potential benefits of AVTs over five years using historical data.
- Shifts in achievement levels with added value growth.
Implementation
- AVTs can work with interim and benchmark assessments.
- Collaboration with assessment vendors to monitor student growth.
Scoring and Ratings
- 2023 Report Cards: Report proportions of students meeting/exceeding MAT and AVT.
- 2024 Report Cards: Will include scored Added Value Growth Model.
- Scoring Features:
- Growth metric not overly correlated with poverty levels.
- Points based on meeting/exceeding MAT and AVT.
- Indicator points vary by growth percentiles.
Conclusion
- Additional resources and videos to be provided for stakeholder understanding.
- EOC staff available for questions and support.
Note: This overview is a high-level summary of the Added Value Growth Model aimed at educators to help support students' progress towards proficiency.