Continue inserting and checking balance factors, performing rotations as necessary.
Example Insertion Sequence:
40, 20, 10, 25, 30, 22, 50 → Maintain balance after each insertion.
8. Performance of AVL Trees
Height: AVL trees generally maintain height around 1.44 * log n, ensuring quicker search times compared to unbalanced BSTs.
Efficiency: Searching, inserting, and deleting operations remain efficient with time complexity of O(log n).*
9. Comparison with Red-Black Trees
Red-Black Trees: Another type of balanced binary search tree.
Differences: Less strict balancing rules than AVL trees, resulting in fewer rotations.
Both AVL and Red-Black trees are efficient but are used in different contexts depending on performance needs.
Conclusion
AVL trees provide a self-balancing mechanism for binary search trees, ensuring logarithmic height and efficient operations, making them a valuable data structure for various applications.